bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.03.10.710761

Comparative Analysis of Structural and Dynamical Properties of Lipid Membranes Simulated with the AMBER Lipid21 ForceField Using SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP3P-FB, TIP4P-FB, TIP4P-Ew, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P-D, and OPC Water Models

Chakraborty, D. S.·Singh, P. P.·Dey, C.·Kaur, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have conducted all atom molecular dynamics simulations of POPC and DPPC lipid bilayers using AMBER Lipid21 force field with eight different water models, including SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP3P-FB, TIP4P-FB, TIP4P-Ew, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P-D, and OPC, to identify the most compatible one without any modification. A number of parameters have been computed in order to understand the structure of the lipid bilayer: Area per lipid, Isothermal compressibility modulus, average Volume per lipid, electron density profile, bilayer thickness, X-ray and neutron scattering form factors, deuterium order parameter, and radial distribution function. The estimated Area per lipid, Isothermal compressibility factor, volume per lipid and bilayer thickness are highly consistent with experimental results for the SPC/E water model, indicating its suitability with the AMBER Lipid21 force field, insted of any modification. The bilayer electron density profiles of both the lipid bilayers demonstrate a little augmentation of water penetration with respect to the membrane surface for TIP4P-D water model. However, the experimental X-ray and neutron scattering form factors are aligning well with the simulated results for all studied water models, and TIP4P-D shows better for X-ray data. The deuterium order parameter for lipid acyl chains value less than 0.25 for all observed water models, depicting their disorderness for both the lipid bilayers. The lateral diffusion and reorientation autocorrelation function of the lipid molecules in both the bilayers are computed to reveal their dynamics across all water models. In comparison to other water models, the simulated trajectories predict better structure and reasonably fair dynamic properties for the SPC/E water model. The TIP4P-Ew water model reproduces the lateral diffusion co-efficient in close agreement with experiment. Reorientational dynamics for both the lipids in the bilayers for eight different water models are observed; the presence of slow and slowest time components corresponds to the lipid axial motion (wobble motion) and Twist/Splay motions. So, in view of the overall performance of the different water models with the AMBER Lipid21 all atom force field in reproducing membrane physical properties, the SPC/E water model appears to be an optimal choice.

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chakraborty, D. S., Singh, P. P., Dey, C., Kaur, J.. 2026-03-12. Comparative Analysis of Structural and Dynamical Properties of Lipid Membranes Simulated with the AMBER Lipid21 ForceField Using SPC/E, TIP3P, TIP3P-FB, TIP4P-FB, TIP4P-Ew, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P-D, and OPC Water Models. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.03.10.710761

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗