bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.24.707688

Pharmacological targeting of EED is an effective therapeutic strategy in cellular models of incurable neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Abstract

BackgroundNeuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (NEPC) is an incurable malignancy, originating from the trans-differentiation of prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD). Compared to PRAD, NEPC shows over-activation of Polycomb Repressive complex-1(PRC1) and-2 (PRC2), which are multiprotein epigenetic writers that drive cancer progression via tumour suppressor gene silencing. Tazemetostat is a PRC2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of sarcomas and lymphomas. ORIC-944 is a novel EED (Embryonic Ectoderm Development) inhibitor, which is being tested in clinical trials. EED is an attractive target as it functions as a key component of both PRC1 and PRC2. Objective and MethodsWe compared the anticancer effects of tazemetostat and ORIC-944 in NEPC and PRAD cells. Cells were exposed to various concentrations of the two compounds to measure effects on cell viability (IC50) and apoptosis (flow cytometry). PRC2 inhibition was confirmed by measuring histone H3 Lys 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) via ELISA and Western Blot. RNA Sequencing and pathway analysis was conducted to study modes of actions of tazemetostat vs ORIC-944. ResultsUnlike tazemetostat, ORIC-944 causes dose-dependent growth inhibition in both NEPC and PRAD cells. In this context, EED targeting achieves IC50 values that are comparable to those of compounds used for the clinical treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Moreover, ORIC-944 (but not tazemetostat) causes significant apoptosis in NEPC cells. Both tazemetostat and ORIC-944 reduce H3K27me3. Mechanistically, both compounds reactivate the expression of known PRC2 targets, such as genes that control neural differentiation. However, the EED inhibitor also reactivates PRC1 targets, including pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferating genes (e.g. metallothionines). This evidence suggests that EED inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for NEPC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Orchard, K. J., Bryant, G., Latarani, M., Misir, I. R., Yerra, S. M., Velanis, C., Banchi, M., Fischetti, I., Turnball, S. L., Eccleston, M., Kelly, T. K., Burke, E., Maylin, Z. R., Bocci, G., Shamash, J., Berney, D., Brentnall, A., Akamatsu, S., Lin, D., Lu, Y.-J., Jachetti, E., Wang, Y., Crea, F. M.. 2026-02-25. Pharmacological targeting of EED is an effective therapeutic strategy in cellular models of incurable neuroendocrine prostate cancer. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.24.707688

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

m6A-Driven Intratumoral Cholesterol Biosynthesis Fuels Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progression

Both nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) machinery are indispensable for proper cellular function. Although their collaborative roles in the nuclear export of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) have been reported, it remains ambiguous whether and how this collaboration may contribute to cancer progression. Here we identify a functional cooperation between NPCs and m6A signaling that promotes the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We showed that nuclear export of m6A-modified mRNAs, mediated by the interaction between RNA methyltransferase METTL3 and the nucleoporin NUP93, is functionally coupled to cholesterol biosynthesis. Given that cholesterol-fueled intratumoral androgen production is one of the mechanisms driving CRPC, we demonstrated that overexpression of the wild-type METTL3 or NUP93, but neither the enzymatically dead METTL3 nor the mutant NUP93 that loses METTL3-interacting capability, elevates intracellular levels of androgens, activates AR signaling under castrate condition, and promotes androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 or targeted demethylation on mRNAs encoding key cholesterol biosynthesis enzymes effectively suppressed CRPC malignancy. Together, these findings uncover a therapeutically targetable m6A-METTL3-NUP93 axis that links nuclear mRNA export and metabolic reprogramming to fuel CRPC progression, providing a conceptually new strategy for the treatment of this lethal disease.

cancer biology↗

ST6Gal2 promotes α2,6-sialylation and aggressive phenotypes in neuroblastoma cells

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. Its clinical behavior ranges from spontaneous regression to lethal, treatment-refractory disease. Aberrant 2,6-sialylation contributes to aggressive phenotypes in many cancers, but the role of ST6Gal2, a neural-enriched 2,6-sialyltransferase, in neuroblastoma is largely unexplored. Here, we examine the clinical and functional significance of ST6Gal2 in neuroblastoma. In two independent public cohorts (SEQC, n=498; Kocak, n=649), high ST6GAL2 expression was associated with significantly worse overall and event-free survival. In the SEQC cohort, ST6GAL2 expression was higher in high-risk and MYCN-amplified tumors, varied across International Neuroblastoma Staging System stages, and correlated positively with a mesenchymal transcriptional signature (Spearman {rho}=0.181). The mesenchymal correlation was reproduced in the Kocak cohort ({rho}=0.204). Stable shRNA-mediated knockdown of ST6GAL2 in SK-N-AS and SK-N-BE(2) cells reduced proliferation and viability, impaired wound closure, and decreased migration and invasion. In preliminary experiments in SK-N-AS cells, ST6GAL2 knockdown reduced binding of Sambucus nigra agglutinin, consistent with a role for ST6Gal2 in 2,6-sialylation. Together, these findings link ST6Gal2 expression to aggressive clinical and transcriptional features and pro-tumorigenic phenotypes in neuroblastoma and nominate ST6Gal2-mediated sialylation as a candidate pathway for mechanistic study.

cancer biology↗

Unsupervised transcriptomic analysis of paired pre- and post-treatment specimens reveals divergent chemoimmunomodulatory induction trajectories in breast cancer

The immunomodulatory effects of chemotherapy (chemoimmunomodulation; CIM) are clinically consequential and heterogeneous, yet no systematic framework exists for classifying the immunomodulatory trajectory a tumor follows in response to treatment (CIM trajectory). Here, we present the CIM Induction Classifier (CIMIC), an unsupervised clustering pipeline leveraging delta gene expression across 3,189 CIM-related genes to classify specimens chemoimmunomodulatory trajectory. Applied to two pre- and post-chemotherapy breast cancer (BC) datasets (NKI/SMC, N = 36; NEO, N = 19) and nine epirubicin-perturbed triple-negative BC (TNBC) cell lines, CIMIC identified two divergent CIM trajectories: a functional CIM (Fun-CIM) trajectory, broadly conserved across tumors and cell lines and characterized by induction of inflammatory cell death, antigen presentation, viral mimicry, and adaptive immune activation programs, and a dysfunctional CIM (Dys-CIM) trajectory, characterized by induction of proteostatic and metabolic stress-adaptation programs, reduced immune cell abundances and cytotoxic activity, and enrichment of aggressive BC subtypes. Using survival and longitudinal transcriptomic data in NKI/SMC (N = 20), treatment-induced increases in Fun-CIM-associated genes and ssGSEA scores were associated with reduced recurrence, whereas Dys-CIM-associated genes and scores were associated with increased recurrence. In multivariable analyses within independent chemotherapy-treated BC cohorts (METABRIC, N = 412; SCAN-B, N = 2,462), higher baseline Fun-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with better outcomes, whereas higher baseline Dys-CIM ssGSEA scores were associated with worse outcomes. These findings establish CIM as a dynamic, trajectory-level process and position CIMIC as a framework for defining CIM trajectories and supporting future efforts to identify predictors, mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies that maximize beneficial CIM.

cancer biology↗