bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.19.706729

HLA Alleles Imprint Distinct Biases in the Usage Preferences of TCR Vβ segments

Abstract

T cells must co-recognize peptide and HLA, yet the extent to which this specificity is shaped by germline-encoded TCR-HLA contacts versus selection during thymic development has remained difficult to quantify. Leveraging population-scale TCR{beta} repertoires linked to donor HLA genotypes, we construct allele-specific V{beta} usage profiles and normalize them to repertoire-wide baselines to derive interpretable HLA-TCR V{beta} preference vectors. We demonstrate that different HLA alleles imprint distinct biases in the usage frequency of TCR V{beta} gene segments among the public TCRs that engage those alleles; consistent with germline-encoded TCR-HLA contact preferences, certain V{beta} genes are over-represented for particular HLA alleles. Similarities in HLA amino-acid sequence predict similarities in both their V{beta} preferences and peptide-binding motifs; a residue-level analysis disentangles HLA positions primarily associated with TCR engagement from those associated with peptide motifs. The TCR-associated HLA positions localize to canonical TCR-facing helices, whereas peptide-associated HLA positions track binding pockets, revealing distinct molecular routes by which HLA polymorphism shapes the TCR and peptide sides of recognition. CMV exposure stratifications confirmed these patterns are not explained by a few dominant infections. Together, these data support that germline-encoded constraints set the landscape of TCR-HLA compatibility, while thymic and peptide-driven forces tune the realized repertoire. These HLA-specific V{beta} biases are a biological prior that should provide a baseline for better understanding of TCR-pHLA specificity as a whole and should be accounted for in future evaluation of any TCR-pHLA specificity prediction methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Castorina, L. V., Noakes, M. T., Pisani, L., Greissl, J., Robins, H., Chen-Harris, H., Zahid, H. J.. 2026-02-20. HLA Alleles Imprint Distinct Biases in the Usage Preferences of TCR Vβ segments. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.19.706729

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗