bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.02.10.705054

To Be or Not to Be an Oocyte: Msps/XMAP215 Controls Oocyte Cell Fate in the Drosophila Ovary

Abstract

Cell fate determination, the process by which cells commit to specific identities, is fundamental to development. Oocyte specification in Drosophila provides an excellent model to dissect these molecular mechanisms. In the Drosophila ovary, 16 interconnected germline cells arise through four mitotic divisions with incomplete cytokinesis. Among them, the two oldest cells become pro-oocytes, and one is selected to develop into the oocyte while maintaining diploidy; the remaining 15 differentiate into nurse cells and enter endoreplication. Previously, we showed that Mini spindles (Msps), a microtubule polymerase and homolog of XMAP215, is essential for oocyte maintenance. Here, we report that Msps/XMAP215 is expressed early in development, with both mRNA and protein enriched in the pro-oocytes prior to oocyte specification. Knockdown of Msps prevents oocyte specification, leading to egg chambers with 16 nurse cells. Loss of Msps also disrupts the accumulation of the oocyte marker Orb and the microtubule minus-end binding protein Patronin/CAMSAP, both critical for oocyte specification. Remarkably, optogenetic recruitment of Msps is sufficient to increase microtubule polymerization and promote Orb accumulation in nurse cells, suggesting that Msps activity is sufficient to drive oocyte fate determination. Furthermore, we show that Msps associates with the germline-specific organelles, spectrosome and fusome, and becomes asymmetrically distributed among sister cells, allowing the two pro-oocytes to inherit higher levels of Msps than their siblings. Together, we propose a model in which Msps-mediated microtubule polymerization provides the pro-oocyte with a competitive advantage, initiating a positive feedback loop that involves dynein-dependent transport of msps mRNA to reinforce oocyte specification. TeaserA self-reinforcing cytoskeletal feedback loop selects a single egg cell from a cluster of interconnected germ cells.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lu, W., Lakonishok, M., Neiswender, H., Gonsalvez, G. B., Gelfand, V. I.. 2026-02-11. To Be or Not to Be an Oocyte: Msps/XMAP215 Controls Oocyte Cell Fate in the Drosophila Ovary. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.10.705054

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗