bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.01.04.697572

Leveraging TNFR2 for antitumour immunity: T reg depletion and myeloid reprogramming versus T cell costimulation

Abstract

Although checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment, responses are largely restricted to targeting CTLA-4 and PD-(L)1. TNFR2 has been identified as a target of interest, but a lack of understanding of whether agonists or blockers should be used, and whether Fc{gamma}R interactions promote effcacy, has hampered therapeutic antibody development. Here, we engineered two distinct -TNFR2 types: ligand-blocking Fc{gamma}R-engaging versus non-ligand-blocking agonist antibodies. Both showed potent anti-tumor effcacy across multiple syngeneic mouse tumor models and combined effectively with -PD-1. The ligand-blocking antibody depleted intratumoral T regs and reprogrammed the myeloid compartment, directing monocytes towards a pro-inflammatory macrophage and dendritic cell trajectory. Surprisingly, this effect depended on both inhibitory and activating Fc{gamma}Rs. In contrast, the agonist directly co-stimulated T and NK cells, through partially Fc{gamma}R-independent mechanisms. Both antibodies converged on activating tumor-specific CD8+ T cells mediating tumor rejection. Clinical assessment of both ligand-blocking (BI-1808) and agonist (BI-1910) -TNFR2 antibodies is currently ongoing. Graphical abstractO_LILigand-blocking anti-TNFR2 mAbs (BI-1808 and 3F10) deplete CCR8+ T regs and activate myeloid cells, remodeling the TME and leading to CD8+ T cell killing of cancer cells. T reg depletion and myeloid activation are mediated through interaction with activating Fc{gamma}Rs and the inhibitory Fc{gamma}RIIB, respectively. C_LIO_LIAgonist anti-TNFR2 mAbs (BI-1910 and 5A05) intrinsically agonize TNFR2 on T cells and NK cells, which is enhanced by Fc{gamma}RIIB crosslinking. The resulting broad lymphocyte activation mediates cancer cell killing. C_LI O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/697572v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3ecc17org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c936a7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@23189aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@243a05_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Holmkvist, P., Cleary, K., Svensson, C., Semmrich, M., Yoosuf, N., Ferreira, G. A., Boden, M., Blidberg, T., Dadas, O., Mattsson, J., Ermert, D., Birgersson, E., Pitic, V., Taylor, M., Yazdani, M., Tornberg, U.-C., Karlsson, I., Lim, S., Beers, S. A., Cragg, M., Frendeus, B. L., Teige, I.. 2026-01-04. Leveraging TNFR2 for antitumour immunity: T reg depletion and myeloid reprogramming versus T cell costimulation. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.04.697572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Common viral infections seed regionally distinct resident memory T cells in the human CNS

T cells persist in the central nervous system (CNS) and can drive both protection and neurological disease. How these cells are organized in humans and what they recognize is largely unknown. Here, we profiled CD8 T cells across anatomically distinct CNS regions, obtained through on-site autopsies and temporal lobe resection surgeries, using single-cell RNA sequencing, paired T cell receptor sequencing, and DNA-barcoded tetramers. Resident memory T cells (TRM) specific for Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2 were identified across CNS compartments. Anatomical location was the strongest correlate of TRM cell state, with leptomeningeal cells adopting a cytokine-poised TRM program, whereas brain TRM cells were transcriptionally restrained. Cells of the same clonotype spanned tissues yet adopted local transcriptional states. Viral specificity added another layer of TRM heterogeneity with GZMK/GZMA-expressing EBV-specific populations and interferon-stimulated gene signatures in SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A-specific cells. The human CNS thus harbors regionally distinct CD8+ TRM shaped by common viral exposures.

immunology↗

A regulatory T cell signature provides a shared molecular basis for the therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatic disease

Rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and osteoarthritis (OA), show distinct phenotypes yet respond to overlapping therapies, implicating shared immune mechanisms. In the Transimmunom cohort, we profiled peripheral blood from 240 individuals (47 healthy, 44 OA, 91 RA, 58 SpA) across deep immunophenotyping, immunoproteomics and Treg-Teff transcriptomics. Single-layer analyses revealed broader Treg than Teff remodeling, along with a shared pattern of reduced activated Tregs and expanded Helios+ Tregs across all diseases, alongside a decrease in functional Treg subpopulations, including CTLA4+ and CD45RA- Tregs. In RA specifically, LAG3+ Tregs were also expanded. Combining omics layers outperformed single-layer approaches for disease classification. Among individual layers, Treg transcriptomes were most discriminative, and integration uncovered disease-specific programs. Unsupervised clustering identified a cross-disease cluster independent of activity, treatment and age, mapping to early disease (<= years) and dominated by a Treg dysfunction-associated program. These results provide a biological rationale for the therapeutic "window of opportunity" concept and duration-stratified Treg-directed trials.

immunology↗

Inhibitory Fc Receptor sets a time limit on macrophage response to IgG

Antibodies engage both activating Fc Receptors and the inhibitory receptor Fc{gamma}RIIB. Why macrophages need a dedicated inhibitory receptor rather than simply tuning activating receptor signaling is unclear. Using DNA-based chimeric receptors and in silico modeling, we independently controlled activating and inhibitory Fc Receptors. We found that Fc{gamma}RIIB imposed a time limit on macrophage phagocytosis and ERK signaling. The time limit is due to activating Fc Receptors converting PI(4,5)P2 to PI(3,4,5)P3, which is subsequently converted to PI(3,4)P2 by Fc{gamma}RIIB. This leads to a pulse of active signaling, which is sufficient for phagocytosis of small bacteria-sized targets but not phagocytosis of large targets and TNF secretion. Unlike engaging Fc{gamma}RIIB, reducing activating Fc Receptor signaling decreased initiation of phagocytosis, the speed of PI(3,4,5)P3 generation, and the amplitude of ERK signaling. Our results demonstrate that Fc{gamma}RIIB controls the duration of IgG signaling, while the activating Fc Receptors control sensitivity.

immunology↗