Modeling the Action-Perception Loop and its role in Phantom Limb Pain using Active Inference

Abstract

Phantom limb pain is among the most prevalent and distressing consequences of limb amputation. Theories regarding its underlying mechanisms remain disputed, contributing to challenges in effectively treating the pain. In recent years, mathematical models grounded in the Bayesian inference framework have been used to describe various aspects of pain perception. However, pain is not only passively inferred but actively shaped through interactions with the environment--a dimension that classical Bayesian approaches typically do not capture. Because amputation disrupts both sensory input related to the limb and the ability to perform actions, a model incorporating both sensory and active components of pain may provide new insight into the mechanisms underlying phantom limb pain. To this end, we developed a model within the active inference framework, which extends Bayesian inference to include action selection. The model provides a conceptual account of how loss of limb control, ambiguity in sensory input pertaining to limb position, residual noxious input, and pre-amputation pain may contribute to the emergence and persistence of phantom limb pain. Furthermore, it offers insight into the possible mechanisms underlying common interventions and may help account for their variable efficacy across individuals. Author summaryPhantom limb pain is a condition where pain is perceived as arising from a limb that is no longer present. Despite being one of the most prevalent and distressing consequences of limb amputation, theories regarding the underlying mechanism of phantom limb pain remain disputed. Here, we present a mathematical model that investigates possible mechanisms underlying this complex pain condition. Using the active inference framework, which combines sensory perception and action selection processes, the model provides a conceptual account of how four distinct factors - loss of control of the limb, ambiguity in sensory input pertaining to limb position, residual activity in afferent nociceptive neurons, and pre-amputation pain - may contribute to the emergence and persistence of phantom limb pain following amputation. Furthermore, our model offers insight into the possible mechanisms underlying common interventions and may help explain why their efficacy varies across individuals.