bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2025.12.04.692430

Quantifying the susceptibility of polygenic scores to ancestry stratification

Abstract

Polygenic scores aim to predict phenotypes from genetic data, yet they remain vulnerable to spurious correlations arising from environmental variation that covaries with population structure. While standard methods like Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) mitigate this, quantifying the residual risk for specific applications remains challenging. Here, we develop a theoretical framework that quantifies the proportion of genetic variance in a GWAS panel explained by an external ancestry gradient (H), providing a direct measure of stratification susceptibility. We show that this baseline risk is amplified by the ascertainment process itself, which creates a directional bias ({Phi}) that is particularly strong for variants with intermediate probabilities of ascertainment. Applying this framework to the UK Biobank, we find that while uncorrected susceptibility is drastically higher in diverse cohorts, PCA correction effectively flattens this disparity. We observe that the residual susceptibility (H') in corrected diverse panels is often comparable to, or marginally lower than, that found in restricted homogeneous subsets, suggesting that sample diversity need not compromise stratification control. However, for both study designs, residual structure often remains just above or indistinguishable from the theoretical limit of detection. Because even undetectable levels of structure can accumulate to produce significant bias in highly polygenic scores, we introduce a diagnostic to calculate the critical magnitude of environmental confounding required to explain an observed signal. Using this diagnostic, we find that both the well-known divergence in height scores between Sardinia and mainland Europe and novel signals of divergence in systolic blood pressure scores within the British Isles appear relatively robust to residual stratification, albeit for different reasons. While the Sardinia signal would require moderate-to-strong environmental confounding to align with a vanishingly small residual ancestry axis, the systolic blood pressure signals would require implausibly large environmental effects to be explained as artifacts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Blanc, J., Mawass, W., Berg, J. J.. 2025-12-04. Quantifying the susceptibility of polygenic scores to ancestry stratification. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.04.692430

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Generation of a transgenic cephalopod

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are marine mollusks with elaborate nervous systems that support a diverse repertoire of complex behaviors. These include the neural control of the color, pattern, and texture of the skin, facilitating both adaptive camouflage and innate patterning that may reflect internal state. The development of transgenic cephalopods expressing fluorescent proteins, optogenetic actuators, and reporters of neural activity would contribute a new and important technology to cephalopod biology. The generation of transgenic cephalopods, however, has remained a major challenge. Here, we report the development of stable transgenic dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) expressing ubiquitous nuclear-localized mScarlet, a red fluorescent protein. We evaluated multiple strategies for transgenesis, and established cuttlefish lines using both CRISPR and the transposons Sleeping Beauty and Minos. The stable expression of transgenes enabled live imaging of cell dynamics during embryonic development. The Minos transposon emerged as the most efficient transgenesis strategy and is adaptable to promoters and transgenes of choice. These strategies now enable the generation of diverse genetic tools for mechanistic studies of cephalopod biology.

genetics↗

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗