bioRxiv ScienceSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/796177

Understanding the factors influencing citizens willingness-to-accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pig and fish in Brazil

Abstract

The increase in worlds population will cause a high demand of animal-sourced food, which will require a boost in the production of protein, because protein is an important component of animal feed. A higher production of protein, however, might contribute for the depletion of environmental resources. In this scenario, the use of insects as an alternative source of protein to feed animals could be a solution. However, citizens willingness-to-accept insect as a source of protein to feed animals is unknown, particularly in developing countries, such as Brazil. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing citizens willingness-to-accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pig and fish. To reach this aim, we conducted an online survey with Brazilian citizens. We analyzed the data using descriptive statistics and four logistic regression models. In each of logistic models, the dependent variable was citizens willingness-to-accept the use of insects to feed either poultry, or cattle, or pig or fish. A set of independent variables including socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes, perceived benefits, perceived risks, and perceived concerns were used to explain citizens' willingness-to-accept the use of insect to feed animals. Results showed that most citizens would accept that poultry, pig, and fish receive insect-based diets, and half of the citizens would accept and half would not accept that cattle receive such diet. Results of the logistic regression models showed that citizens who had a positive attitude about using insects to feed animals were more willing-to-accept the use of insect to feed poultry, cattle, pig, and fish compared to those who had a negative attitude. Citizens who perceived the benefits of using insect to feed animals were less willing-to-accept the use of insects to feed poultry compared to those who didnt perceive the benefits. Citizens who perceived the benefits of using insects to feed animals were more willing-to-accept the use of insect to feed fish compared to those who didnt perceive the benefits. Citizens who were more concerned about using insect to feed animals were more willing-to-accept the use of insects to feed poultry compared to those who were less concerned. Finally, citizens who were more concerned about using insects to feed animals were less willing-to-accept the use of insect to feed pigs compared to those who were less concerned. These results revealed important insights that can be used to design strategies to increase the acceptance of the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pig, and fish.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Domingues, C. H. d. F., Borges, J. A. R., Ruviaro, C. F., Gomes Freire Guidolin, D., Rosa Mauad Carrijo, J.. 2019-10-07. Understanding the factors influencing citizens willingness-to-accept the use of insects to feed poultry, cattle, pig and fish in Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1101/796177

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education

Plagiarism in Brazil: A perspective of 25,000 PhD holders across the sciences

When it comes to ownership of ideas in science, Robert K. Merton (1957) observed in Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science that "what is true of physics, chemistry, astronomy, medicine and mathematics is true also of all the other scientific disciplines, not excluding the social and psychological sciences". However, consensus over related issues, such as what constitutes plagiarism in these fields cannot be taken for granted. We conducted a comprehensive study on plagiarism views among PhD holders registered in the database of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). We collected 25,157 valid responses encompassing views and attitudes toward plagiarism from a probability sample of PhD holders across the fields, including biologists, physicists, mathematicians, and engineers as well as linguists, philosophers and anthropologists. The results suggest that core principles about plagiarism are shared among this multidisciplinary community and that they corroborate Mertons observations. Before this study, we could only speculate that this is the case. With these data from a probability sample of Brazilian academia (PhD holders), this study offers insight into the way plagiarism is perceived across the sciences, including the literature and arts, and sheds light on the problem in the context of international collaborative research networks. The data focus on a young research system in Latin America, but, given the cultural similarities that bind most Latin-American nations, these results may be relevant to other PhD populations in the region and should provide a comparison with studies from other emerging, non-Anglophone regions.

scientific communication and education

Turn of Events: Academic events as a platform for preregistration

Prereg posters are conference posters that present planned scientific projects. We provide preliminary evidence for their value in receiving constructive feedback, promoting open science, and supporting early career researchers.View Full Text

scientific communication and education