bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/774612

Expert Curation of the Human and Mouse Olfactory Receptor Gene Repertoires Identifies Conserved Coding Regions Split Across Two Exons

Abstract

Olfactory receptor (OR) genes are the largest multi-gene family in the mammalian genome, with over 850 in human and nearly 1500 genes in mouse. The expansion of the OR gene repertoire has occurred through numerous duplication events followed by diversification, resulting in a large number of highly similar paralogous genes. These characteristics have made the annotation of the complete OR gene repertoire a complex task. Most OR genes have been predicted in silico and are typically annotated as intronless coding sequences. Here we have developed an expert curation pipeline to analyse and annotate every OR gene in the human and mouse reference genomes. By combining evidence from structural features, evolutionary conservation and experimental data, we have unified the annotation of these gene families, and have systematically determined the protein-coding potential of each locus. We have defined the non-coding regions of many OR genes, enabling us to generate full-length transcript models. We found that 13 human and 41 mouse OR loci have coding sequences that are split across two exons. These split OR genes are conserved across mammals, and are expressed at the same level as protein-coding OR genes with an intronless coding region. Our findings challenge the long-standing and widespread notion that the coding region of a vertebrate OR gene is contained within a single exon.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Barnes, I. H., Ibarra-Soria, X., Fitzgerald, S., Gonzalez, J. M., Davidson, C., Hardy, M. P., Manthravadi, D., Van Gerven, L., Jorissen, M., Zeng, Z., Khan, M., Mombaerts, P., Harrow, J., Logan, D. W., Frankish, A.. 2019-09-19. Expert Curation of the Human and Mouse Olfactory Receptor Gene Repertoires Identifies Conserved Coding Regions Split Across Two Exons. https://doi.org/10.1101/774612

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

An invariant network architecture with broadly expressed regulators distinguishes cell-type from cell-state identity in situ

Core regulatory networks (CRNs) of tissue-specific master transcription factors (TFs) are essential for defining cell identity and are widely used to reprogram cells and to decipher pathogenic mechanisms. However, to date, CRNs have only been described at the cell-type level: their characteristics in the distinct states that a single cell type can adopt have not been examined. This leaves open what the cell-type CRNs actually represent. Here, using the zonated hepatocyte states of the mouse liver as a model system, we construct the first state-level CRNs in a native tissue. For this purpose, we developed a robust LCM-Spatial-ATAC-seq method that achieves bulk-level data quality from microdissected cell populations. By identifying what is shared among the state-level CRNs, we determined what is cell-type defining: an invariant sub-network of core-regulatory TFs (crTFs) that maintains identical positions and conserved interactions in the CRNs. Unexpectedly, the top positions of this invariant sub-network are occupied by broadly expressed TFs rather than the well-established master TFs, which reside downstream. Yet the state-level CRNs are clearly different, both in terms of composition and interactions. The former are dominated by zone-specific regulators, whereas the latter are spread throughout the network, encompassing about one third of all interactions between the states. Thus, our results reveal a novel dual character of a cell's CRN: an invariant sub-network that defines the cell-type identity, together with a variable peripheral network that underlies its state specialization.

genomics↗

Towards a complete diploid chicken genome

The repetitive and heterochromatic parts of microchromosomes and dot chromosomes have impeded the creation of a complete, haplotype-resolved chicken genome. To overcome these challenges, we employed a trio-sequencing approach, utilizing long reads from a female chick, supplemented by parental long-read data for accurate haplotype phasing. This strategy produced nearly complete, haplotype-resolved paternal and maternal assemblies, with 14 residual gaps. Telomeric sequences remain missing in two paternal and four maternal chromosomes, suggesting a still incomplete assembly. GGswu2 resolved more than 50 Mb of previously unresolved regions, predominantly within dot chromosomes. The dot chromosomes exhibit low nucleotide diversity but a high density of structural variants between haplotypes. We found that the centromere sizes and relative positions of centromere cores sometimes differ between the two haplotype genomes. These findings suggest that comparative genomics must incorporate the high-resolution of these dynamic complex regions to fully understand avian genome evolution and genetic complexity.

genomics↗

Somatic variant detection using an individual-specific pangenome reference: a case study of a pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patient

Background: Reference bias can cause false or missed somatic variant calls, also in clinically relevant genes. Pangenomes aim to reduce this bias, but evidence of their diagnostic benefit is lacking. We tested how an individual-specific pangenome affects somatic variant calling in bulk samples and single cells. Results: We built an individual-specific pangenome from Nanopore assemblies of normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells of a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We aligned short-read whole-genome sequencing data of bulk and single-cell samples to hg38 and to the pangenome, and called somatic variants with standard downstream tools after anchoring pangenome alignments to hg38. Single nucleotide variants were mostly shared, while indel calls unique to the pangenome were fewer than those unique to hg38, mostly in repeats. Both approaches detected NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) drivers. The pangenome-based phylogeny showed more parallel branching in comparison to hg38-based tree. The pangenome removed three false-positive PRSS1 variants and, in single cells, frameshift insertion calls next to polyG and polyC repeats. However, surjection to hg38 coordinates split a WT1 driver indel call in a low-complexity region into two separate calls. Validation showed that all somatic structural variant calls, except NUP98-NSD1 and FLT3-ITD, were germline variants or artifacts. Conclusions: The use of individual-specific pangenome led to fewer false-positive indel and driver calls, mainly in repeats and single cells, and changed the branching of the inferred phylogeny. However, surjection artifacts and false-positive somatic structural variants show that pangenome-based results need read-level inspection and validation before clinical use.

genomics↗