bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/757062

DeepCLIP: Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-RNA binding with Deep Learning

Abstract

Nucleotide variants can cause functional changes by altering protein-RNA binding in various ways that are not easy to predict. This can affect processes such as splicing, nuclear shuttling, and stability of the transcript. Therefore, correct modelling of protein-RNA binding is critical when predicting the effects of sequence variations. Many RNA-binding proteins recognize a diverse set of motifs and binding is typically also dependent on the genomic context, making this task particularly challenging. Here, we present DeepCLIP, the first method for context-aware modeling and predicting protein binding to nucleic acids using exclusively sequence data as input. We show that DeepCLIP outperforms existing methods for modelling RNA-protein binding. Importantly, we demonstrate that DeepCLIP is able to reliably predict the functional effects of contextually dependent nucleotide variants in independent wet lab experiments. Furthermore, we show how DeepCLIP binding profiles can be used in the design of therapeutically relevant antisense oligonucleotides, and to uncover possible position-dependent regulation in a tissue-specific manner. DeepCLIP can be freely used at http://deepclip.compbio.sdu.dk.\n\nHighlightsO_LIWe have designed DeepCLIP as a simple neural network that requires only CLIP binding sites as input. The architecture and parameter settings of DeepCLIP makes it an efficient classifier and robust to train, making high performing models easy to train and recreate.\nC_LIO_LIUsing an extensive benchmark dataset, we demonstrate that DeepCLIP outperforms existing tools in classification. Furthermore, DeepCLIP provides direct information about the neural networks decision process through visualization of binding motifs and a binding profile that directly indicates sequence elements contributing to the classification.\nC_LIO_LITo show that DeepCLIP models generalize to different datasets we have demonstrated that predictions correlate with in vivo and in vitro experiments using quantitative binding assays and minigenes.\nC_LIO_LIIdentifying the binding sites for regulatory RNA-binding proteins is fundamental for efficient design of (therapeutic) antisense oligonucleotides. Employing a reported disease associated mutation, we demonstrate that DeepCLIP can be used for design of therapeutic antisense oligonucleotides that block regions important for binding of regulatory proteins and correct aberrant splicing.\nC_LIO_LIUsing DeepCLIP binding profiles, we uncovered a possible position-dependent mechanism behind the reported tissue-specificity of a group of TDP-43 repressed pseudoexons.\nC_LIO_LIWe have made DeepCLIP available as an online tool for training and application of proteinRNA binding deep learning models and prediction of the potential effects of clinically detected sequence variations (http://deepclip.compbio.sdu.dk/). We also provide DeepCLIP as a configurable stand-alone program (http://www.github.com/deepclip).\nC_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Groenning, A. G. B., Doktor, T. K., Larsen, S. J., Petersen, U. S. S., Holm, L. L., Bruun, G. H., Hansen, M. B., Hartung, A.-M., Baumbach, J., Andresen, B. S.. 2019-09-05. DeepCLIP: Predicting the effect of mutations on protein-RNA binding with Deep Learning. https://doi.org/10.1101/757062

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Accelerating discovery and integration from RNA to Protein with R2T2P

Integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data remains an unmet challenge in the post-genomics era, discouraging researchers from pursuing integrative approaches to molecular biology research. Leveraging the power of translation profiling, we present RNA to Translation to Protein (R2T2P), a computational platform integrating genome-guided transcriptome assembly with identification of translation and proteins, including a tailored differential analysis framework and support for multiple reference transcriptomes. We applied R2T2P to investigate a cellular model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), where ectopic expression of the DUX4 retrogene in skeletal muscle triggers significant alterations in transcription and RNA metabolism. We uncovered hundreds of uncharacterized, highly overexpressed RNAs, including antisense and alternative transcripts, and quantified their contribution to translatome and proteome. Re-analysis of expression datasets from patient-derived myotubes and muscle biopsies validated this alternative transcriptome in FSHD patients, adding a reservoir of bona-fide novel molecular actors in a rare disease. Available at https://github.com/nfdata-omics/R2T2P/, R2T2P is a flexible and powerful workflow in modern integrative biology.

bioinformatics↗

MorphoANOVA: Dissecting Histology-Gene Expression Relationships in Spatial Transcriptomics

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) measures the expression of hundreds to thousands of genes within tissue architecture, often accompanied by histology images. However, it remains challenging to systematically characterize which genes exhibit associations with tissue morphology, whether these associations vary spatially, and which genes show additional spatial expression patterns beyond those captured by morphology. Here we introduce MorphoANOVA, a gene-wise statistical framework for characterizing morphology--expression relationships across genes measured by ST. Using nested spatially varying coefficient models and sequential ANOVA, MorphoANOVA assesses slide-wide associations with an H\&E-derived morphology feature, location-specific changes in these associations, and additional spatial variation after accounting for the selected feature. The resulting statistics enable gene prioritization and pathway enrichment analysis, while spatial component maps support the interpretation of individual genes. Simulations demonstrate MorphoANOVA's ability to distinguish the modeled components and recover their spatial patterns. Applications to human cortex and breast cancer identify biological programs associated with different morphology--expression patterns and reveal distinct relationships with cell composition. Across three HER2-positive breast cancer patients, invasive-cancer marker genes consistently exhibit stronger evidence of location-specific morphology associations. MorphoANOVA thus provides a framework for systematically interpreting spatial gene-expression patterns in relation to tissue morphology.

bioinformatics↗

Evaluation effects can rival reported concordance gains in cross-cancer survival prediction

Studies of cross-cancer learning for survival prediction from tumour omics have reported concordance gains of 0.020 and 0.045, but how such gains compare with evaluation effects remains unclear. We examined these effects across 13 TCGA cancers (5,761 patients, 1,526 disease-specific deaths), using five repeats of five-fold cross-validation and paired bootstrap intervals. When model selection did not use test data, our borrowing model gained 0.009 (95% interval 0.001 to 0.016) over its target-fitted reference when cancers received equal weight (post hoc). Random-effects pooling gave a gain of 0.002 (-0.002 to 0.006), with most weight assigned to cancers where the model made little use of the pretrained score. Choosing the fusion weight on test splits raised the apparent equal-weight gain to 0.017. We reimplemented a published method, VAECox, which showed no pretraining gain over random initialisation at the last or validation-selected training step. Choosing each network's best test step, as the published code does, raised concordance by 0.03 to 0.05 across the 13-cancer and ten-cancer overall-survival settings, but barely changed the difference between networks. In a constructed post hoc experiment, choosing the best test step only for the pretrained network changed the equal-weight mean difference from -0.004 to +0.045 (+0.035 to +0.054). Across seven multi-omics comparisons, estimates from single five-fold runs differed from their cancer's five-run mean by at least 0.02 in 11% to 42% of runs. Concordance was about 0.02 lower at held-out tissue source sites. Interpreting a reported gain therefore requires each model's selection rule, variation across repeated partitions, the weighting of cancers and the evaluation population.

bioinformatics↗