Variations of gut microbiome profile under different storage conditions and preservation periods: A multi-dimensional evaluation

Abstract

Gut dysbiosis contributes to the development of various human diseases. There are thousands of publications per year for investigating the role of gut microbiota in development of various diseases. However, emerging evidence has indicated data inconsistency between different studies frequently, but gained very little attention by scientists. There are many factors that can cause data variation and inconsistency during the process of microbiota study, in particular, sample storage conditions and subsequent sequencing process. Here, we systemically evaluated the impacts of six fecal sample storage conditions (including -80 {degrees}C, -80 {degrees}C with 70% ethanol (ET_-80 {degrees}C), 4{degrees}C with 70% ethanol (ET_4{degrees}C), and three commercial storage reagents including OMNIgene*GUT OMR-200 (GT), MGIEasy (MGIE), and Longsee (LS)), storage periods (1, 2 weeks or 6 months), and sequencing platform on gut microbiome profile using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Our results suggested that -80{degrees}C is acceptable for fecal sample storage, and the addition of 70% ethanol offers some benefits. Meanwhile, we found that samples in ET_4 {degrees}Cand GT reagents are comparable, both introduced multi-dimensional variations. The use of MGIE resulted in the least alteration, while the greatest changes were observed in samples stored in LS reagents during the whole experiment. Finally, we also confirmed that variations caused by storage condition were larger than that of storage time and sequencing platform.\n\nIMPORTANCEIn the current study, we performed a multi-dimensional evaluation on the variations introduced by types of storage conditions, preservation period and sequencing platform on the basis of data acquired from 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The efficacy of preservation methods was comprehensively evaluated by DNA yield and quality, and {beta} diversity, relative abundance of the dominant bacteria and functional bacteria associated with SCFAs producing and BAs metabolism. Our results confirmed that variations introduced by storage condition were larger than that of storage periods and sequencing platform. Collectively, our study provided a comprehensive view to the impacts of storage conditions, storage times, and sequencing platform on gut microbial profile.