bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/750810

Mix & Match: Phenotypic coexistence as a key facilitator of solid tumour invasion

Abstract

Invasion of healthy tissue is a defining feature of malignant tumours. Traditionally, invasion is thought to be driven by cells that have acquired all the necessary traits to overcome the range of biological and physical defences employed by the body. However, in light of the ever-increasing evidence for geno- and phenotypic intra-tumour heterogeneity an alternative hypothesis presents itself: Could invasion be driven by a collection of cells with distinct traits that together facilitate the invasion process? In this paper, we use a mathematical model to assess the feasibility of this hypothesis in the context of acid-mediated invasion. We assume tumour expansion is obstructed by stroma which inhibits growth, and extra-cellular matrix (ECM) which blocks cancer cell movement. Further, we assume that there are two types of cancer cells: i) a glycolytic phenotype which produces acid that kills stromal cells, and ii) a matrix-degrading phenotype that locally remodels the ECM. We extend the Gatenby-Gawlinski reaction-diffusion model to derive a system of five coupled reaction-diffusion equations to describe the resulting invasion process. We characterise the spatially homogeneous steady states and carry out a simulation study in one spatial dimension to determine how the tumour develops as we vary the strength of competition between the two phenotypes. We find that overall tumour growth is most extensive when both cell types can stably coexist, since this allows the cells to locally mix and benefit most from the combination of traits. In contrast, when inter-species competition exceeds intra-species competition the populations spatially separate and invasion arrests either: i) rapidly (matrix-degraders dominate), or ii) slowly (acid-producers dominate). Overall, our work demonstrates that the spatial and ecological relationship between a heterogeneous population of tumour cells is a key factor in determining their ability to cooperate. Specifically, we predict that tumours in which different phenotypes coexist stably are more invasive than tumours in which phenotypes are spatially separated.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Strobl, M. A. R., Krause, A. L., Damaghi, M., gillies, r. j., Anderson, A., Maini, P. K.. 2019-08-30. Mix & Match: Phenotypic coexistence as a key facilitator of solid tumour invasion. https://doi.org/10.1101/750810

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The methionine cycle sustains the mesenchymal phenotype of tumor cells and drives PDA progression

Mesenchymal traits are associated with poor prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA), but direct targeting of mesenchymal tumor cells remains a challenge. Metabolic profiling of tumor cells isolated from murine PDA and liver metastases (LM) revealed that LM rely more on the methionine cycle than does primary PDA. This metabolic shift was specifically associated with increased activation of the methionine cycle in mesenchymal tumor cells compared to differentiated tumor cells. We show that the targeting of the key enzyme of the methionine cycle S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAHH) in mesenchymal cells lowers the levels of homocysteine (Hcy) and glutathione, resulting in reduced antioxidant capacity, deregulated intracellular calcium homeostasis, and ultimately loss of mesenchymal markers. Together, these events decrease cell proliferation and invasion, blunting the tumorigenic and metastatic potential of SAHH-deficient cells, eventually impeding tumor growth and progression of the metastatic disease. Clinically, the high expression of SAHH in patients with mesenchymal PDA is correlated with poor survival, positioning SAHH as a potential therapeutic target to impede the pro-metastatic, mesenchymal phenotype of PDA.

cancer biology↗

Arrest-associated transcriptional programmes outweigh apoptosis-associated programmes in treatment-naive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is driven by mutant KRAS, and RAS inhibitors now extend survival in previously treated metastatic disease. Whether treatment shrinks a tumour or only halts its growth depends partly on whether cancer cells die or stop dividing, yet how untreated PDAC cells are balanced between these programmes is unknown. Aims: We aimed to characterise the balance between apoptosis-associated and arrest-associated transcriptional programmes in treatment-naive PDAC and to examine their relationships with tumour subtype, TGM2 expression, tissue organisation, survival and drug sensitivity. Methods and results: We scored 52,999 malignant cells from 18 untreated patients in the Hwang atlas using a transcriptional contrast between genes associated with apoptosis and genes associated with resistance to apoptosis or cell-cycle arrest. In every patient the contrast was shifted toward the arrest-associated side: using equality between the two sides as the dividing threshold, 86.3% of cells with an informative score fell on that side, although the proportion depends on the threshold chosen. The shift recurred in the independent Steele atlas (median 71.6% per sample, range 37.1% to 90.8%). In the discovery cohort, tumours with higher basal-like scores had fewer arrest-side cells, and TGM2 expression was modestly higher on the arrest-associated side in both cohorts. The contrast did not track cell-line drug sensitivity or survival in bulk tumours. Conclusion: Untreated PDAC cells show a reproducible transcriptional bias toward anti-apoptotic and cell-cycle-arrest programmes. Whether this bias predicts cellular responses to treatment remains to be tested.

cancer biology↗

Quantitative live imaging reveals region-dependent medulloblastoma disseminationin the zebrafish brain

Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant pediatric brain tumor, and relapse is frequently driven by dissemination within the central nervous system. Yet the early dynamics of tumor spread remain difficult to resolve in vivo. Here, we orthotopically transplanted human medulloblastoma cells into larval zebrafish and followed individual xenografts by longitudinal high-resolution confocal imaging. ONS-76 showed particularly robust dissemination, with hindbrain tumors spreading into the developing cerebellum in 81.5% of larvae, more than fourfold the frequency observed for forebrain or midbrain tumors. Disseminating cells extended along brain-surface and leptomeningeal-like regions and frequently associated with cerebral vasculature. Quantitative analysis of tumor area, perimeter, compactness, convex hull area, and fractal dimension captured changes in growth and spatial complexity over time. Dasatinib reduced tumor expansion and dissemination-related features in a concentration-dependent manner, while higher doses revealed host toxicity. These findings establish a powerful in vivo model for resolving medulloblastoma dissemination and therapeutic response.

cancer biology↗