mTORC1 signaling is not essential for the maintenance of muscle mass and function in adult sedentary mice

Abstract

BackgroundThe balance between protein synthesis and degradation (proteostasis) is a determining factor for muscle size and function. Signaling via the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) regulates proteostasis in skeletal muscle by affecting protein synthesis and autophagosomal protein degradation. Indeed, genetic inactivation of mTORC1 in developing and growing muscle causes atrophy resulting in a lethal myopathy. However, systemic dampening of mTORC1 signaling by its allosteric inhibitor rapamycin is beneficial at the organismal level and increases lifespan. Whether the beneficial effect of rapamycin comes at the expense of muscle mass and function is yet to be established.\n\nMethodsWe conditionally ablated the gene coding for the mTORC1-essential component raptor in muscle fibers of adult mice (iRAmKO). We performed detailed phenotypic and biochemical analyses of iRAmKO mice and compared them with RAmKO mice, which lack raptor in developing muscle fibers. We also used polysome profiling and proteomics to assess protein translation and associated signaling in skeletal muscle of iRAmKO mice.\n\nResultsAnalysis at different time points reveal that, as in RAmKO mice, the proportion of oxidative fibers decreases, but slow-type fibers increase in iRAmKO mice. Nevertheless, no significant decrease in body and muscle mass, or muscle fiber area was detected up to 5 months post-raptor depletion. Similarly, ex vivo muscle force was not significantly reduced in iRAmKO mice. Despite stable muscle size and function, inducible raptor depletion significantly reduced the expression of key components of the translation machinery and overall translation rates.\n\nConclusionsRaptor depletion and hence complete inhibition of mTORC1 signaling in fully-grown muscle leads to metabolic and morphological changes without inducing muscle atrophy even after 5 months. Together, our data indicate that maintenance of muscle size does not require mTORC1 signaling, suggesting that rapamycin treatment is unlikely to negatively affect muscle mass and function.