Direct Pathway Neurons in Mouse Dorsolateral Striatum In Vivo Receive Stronger Synaptic Input than Indirect Pathway Neurons

Abstract

Striatal projection neurons, the medium spiny neurons (MSNs), play a crucial role in various motor and cognitive functions. MSNs express either D1 or D2 type dopamine receptors and initiate the direct-pathway (dMSNs) or indirect pathways (iMSNs) of the basal ganglia, respectively. dMSNs have been shown to receive more inhibition than iMSNs from intrastriatal sources. Based on these findings, computational modelling of the striatal network has predicted that under healthy conditions dMSNs should receive more excitatory input than iMSNs. To test this prediction, we analyzed in vivo whole-cell recordings from dMSNs and iMSNs in healthy and dopamine-depleted (6OHDA) anaesthetized mice. By comparing their membrane potential fluctuations, we found that dMSNs exhibited considerably larger membrane potential fluctuations over a wide frequency range. Furthermore, by comparing the spike-triggered average membrane potentials, we found that dMSNs depolarized towards the spike threshold significantly faster than iMSNs did. Together, these finding corroborate the theoretical prediction that direct-pathway MSNs receive stronger input than indirect-pathway neurons. Finally, we found that dopamine-depleted mice exhibited no difference between the membrane potential fluctuations of dMSNs and iMSNs. These data provide new insights into the question how a lack of dopamine may lead to behavior deficits associated with Parkinsons disease.\n\nSignificance statementThe direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia originate from the D1 and D2 type dopamine receptor expressing medium spiny neurons (dMSNs and iMSNs), respectively. To understand the role of the striatum in brain function and dysfunction it is important to characterize the differences in synaptic inputs to the two MSN types. Theoretical results predicted that dMSNs should receive stronger excitatory input than iMSNs. Here, we studied membrane potential fluctuation statistics of MSNs recorded in vivo in anaesthetized mice and found that dMSNs, indeed, received stronger synaptic input than iMSNs. We corroborated this finding by spike-triggered membrane potential analysis, showing that dMSNs spiking required more synaptic input than iMSNs spiking did, as had been predicted by computational models.