Transplanted cells are essential for the induction but not the expression of cortical plasticity

Abstract

Transplantation of even a small number of embryonic inhibitory neurons from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) into postnatal visual cortex makes it lose responsiveness to an eye deprived of vision when the transplanted neurons reach the age of the normal critical period of activity-dependent ocular dominance (OD) plasticity. The transplant might induce OD plasticity in the host circuitry or might instead construct a parallel circuit of its own to suppress cortical responses to the deprived-eye. We transplanted MGE neurons expressing archaerhodopsin, closed one eyelid for 4-5 days, and, as expected, observed transplant-induced OD plasticity. This plasticity was evident even when the activity of the transplanted cells was suppressed optogenetically, demonstrating that the plasticity was produced by changes in the host visual cortex.\n\nSignificance StatementInterneuron transplantation into mouse V1 creates a window of heightened plasticity which is quantitatively and qualitatively similar to the normal critical period, i.e. short-term occlusion of either eye markedly changes ocular dominance. The underlying mechanism of this process is not known. Transplanted interneurons might either form a separate circuit to maintain the ocular dominance shift or might instead trigger changes in the host circuity. We designed experiments to distinguish the two hypotheses. Our findings suggest that while inhibition produced by the transplanted cells triggers this form of plasticity, the host circuity is entirely responsible for maintaining the ocular dominance shift.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryNeuronal transplants do not just grow and connect--they induce plasticity in the adult brain.