bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/604645

Genomic Analysis of Emerging Florfenicol-Resistant Campylobacter coli Isolated from the Intestinal Cecal Contents of Cattle in the United States

Abstract

ObjectiveGenomic analyses were performed on florfenicol resistant (FFNR) Campylobacter coli (C. coli) isolated from cattle and the cfr(C) gene-associated multi-drug resistance (MDR) plasmid was characterized.\n\nMethodsSixteen FFNR C. coli isolates recovered between 2013-2018 from beef cattle were sequenced using MiSeq. Genomes and plasmids were closed for three of the isolates using the PacBio(R) system. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome and the structures of MDR plasmids were investigated. Conjugation experiments were performed to determine the transferability of cfr(C) associated MDR plasmids. The spectrum of resistance encoded by the cfr(C) gene was further investigated by agar dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing.\n\nResultsAll 16 FFNR isolates were MDR and exhibited co-resistance to ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid, clindamycin and tetracycline. All isolates shared the same resistance genotype, carrying aph(3)-III, hph, {triangleup}aadE (truncated), blaOXA-61, cfr(C), and tet(O) genes plus a mutation of GyrA T86I. The cfr(C), aph(3)-III, hph {triangleup}aadE, and tet(O) genes were co-located on transferable MDR plasmids with size 48-50 kb. These plasmids showed high sequence homology with the pTet plasmid, and carried several Campylobacter virulence genes, including virB2, virB4, virB5, VirB6, virB7, virB8, virb9, virB10, virB11 and virD4. The cfr(C) gene conferred resistance to florfenicol (8-32 {micro}g/ml), clindamycin (512-1,024 {micro}g/ml), linezolid (128-512 {micro}g/ml), and tiamulin (1,024 {micro}g/ml). Phylogenetic analysis showed SNP differences ranging from 11-2,248 among the 16 isolates.\n\nConclusionsThe results showed that the cfr(C) gene located in the conjugative pTet MDR/virulence plasmid is present in diverse strains, where it confers high levels of resistance to several antimicrobials, including linezolid, a critical drug for treating Gram positive bacterial infections in humans. This study highlights the power of genomic antimicrobial resistance surveillance to uncover the intricacies of transmissible co-resistance and provides information that is needed for accurate risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhao, S., Mukherjee, S., Hsu, C.-H., Young, S., Li, C., Tate, H., Morales, C., Haro, J., Thitaram, S., Tillman, G., Dessai, U., McDermott, P. F.. 2019-04-10. Genomic Analysis of Emerging Florfenicol-Resistant Campylobacter coli Isolated from the Intestinal Cecal Contents of Cattle in the United States. https://doi.org/10.1101/604645

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Genomic analysis of the Streptococcus anginosus group; taxonomic implications, evolutionary insights and clinical considerations

Background: The Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) (S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus) causes serious, potentially life-threatening, invasive infections, often in otherwise healthy individuals. However, the group's diversity is still poorly understood, and with it, the ability to identify prognostic markers of severe disease. Methods: Long-read sequencing produced closed genomes for 29 isolates from 25 patients hospitalised primarily for invasive SAG infections, and 21 isolates from 20 non-hospitalised controls. Genomes were classified with GTDB-Tk and combined with 211 reference genomes. After dereplication, 207 SAG genomes (38 isolate, 169 reference) representing 206 strains were analysed using: GTDB classification, average nucleotide identity, multi-marker and core-genome SNP phylogenies, recombination-aware analyses, mobilome, CAZyme and gapseq metabolic profiling, and lineage-aware genome-wide association testing for invasive phenotype. Results: Agreement between GTDB-Tk and MALDI-TOF taxonomic classifications was low (42.8%), including two S. massiliensis cases mis-identified by MALDI-TOF as SAG. S. anginosus resolved into four taxa (S. anginosus, S. hominis, S. whileyi and S. vaginalis). Phylogenies based on core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms resolved these species into distinct clades, whereas 16S rRNA gene and multilocus sequence analysis phylogenies did not. The four ex-S. anginosus taxa showed a gradient of genomic cohesion, with S. vaginalis being near-clonal, in contrast to S. anginosus, which shared high levels of sequence ancestry with other neighbouring taxa. Carbohydrate utilisation was strongly lineage-associated, as was propensity for invasive disease. A ~15Kbp glycosaminoglycan utilisation locus was found in the three taxa of highest disease severity propensity (S. intermedius, S. constellatus, S. whileyi) which predicts a direct host glycosaminoglycan feeding mechanism that may contribute to invasive disease. No single functional feature, gene or core-genome SNP was associated with invasiveness however after lineage-adjustment. Combined feature analysis suggests S. vaginalis has undergone a niche restriction and has evolved for a primary existence in the female urogenital tract. Conclusions: Under-reported species may be mis-diagnosed as SAG invasive infections. SAG is more diverse than its current three-species definition, with the conventional S. anginosus species proposed to be classed into a complex of four distinct taxa. Invasive capacity appears to be an emergent system-level property rather than from individual features.

microbiology↗

Cell-scale confinement reorders bacterial speed rankings

Which bacterium swims fastest depends on where the race is run. Speeds are usually measured in open liquid, yet many bacteria live in pores, mucus and host passages no wider than a cell. Using a microfluidic device with eight channel widths (0.80-3.00 m) in one field of view, we tracked unlabeled cells of eight species spanning five motility systems. Chamber height, a polymer additive and channel width each reordered the ranking. Vibrio alginolyticus, the fastest in open liquid, slowed to ~4 m/s in 1.25-m channels, whereas Campylobacter jejuni and Bacillus subtilis kept 33-46 m/s. Open liquid speed did not predict robustness to confinement. In two unrelated lineages, host symbionts that pass through narrow passages during colonization, Caballeronia insecticola and Vibrio fischeri, outran their non-symbiotic relatives in the channels, and crossed them with flagella wrapped around the cell body at nearly the speed of unwrapped cells. Where space is tight, the ability to keep moving, not top speed, sets the ranking.

microbiology↗

The biochemical composition of coronavirus Nucleocapsid proteins drives the bicistronic properties of their sub-genomic mRNAs

The nucleocapsid (N) gene of coronaviruses (CoVs) encodes a structural RNA-binding protein required for viral assembly. In SARS- and MERS-CoV viruses, reading frame 2 of N contains an overlapping open reading frame (ORF) encoding an innate immune antagonist accessory protein. However, the extent of this dual coding capacity across the CoV family, and the genetic features driving overlapping ORF formation, remain unexamined. Here, we developed an in-silico tool (ORFan) to screen structural gene sub-genomic mRNA sequences from 152 species of coronavirus for the presence of overlapping accessory gene candidates. We found that frame 2 of the N gene in Alpha-, Beta- and Delta-CoVs frequently contains a potential accessory ORF (AcORF), conserved at the subgenus level, unlike the spike, envelope and membrane genes. We also show that CoV nucleotide biases in conjunction with codon biases integral to N protein function drive the relatively high abundances of start codons in frame two and stop codons in frame three, explaining the tendency towards frame 2 AcORFs. We further suggest that viral nucleotide biases and the codon composition required for RNA-binding function facilitate overlapping ORF formation in other virus families

microbiology↗