Chemical biofilm dislodgement with chelating and reducing agents in comparison to sonication: implications for the diagnosis of implant associated infection

Abstract

Sonication of removed devices improved the microbiological diagnosis of infection. Recently, chemical agents have been investigated for dislodgement of biofilms, including the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and the reducing agent dithiothreitol (DTT). We compared the efficacy of chemical methods (EDTA and DTT) to sonication for biofilm dislodgement. Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 53278) biofilms were grown on porous glass beads for 3 days. After biofilm formation, beads were exposed to 0.9% saline, sonication and/or chemical agents. Quantitative and qualitative biofilm analyses were performed by colony counting (CFU/ml), isothermal microcalorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. The colony counts after treatment with EDTA and DTT were similar to those after exposure to 0.9% saline (6.3, 6.1 and 6.0 log CFU/ml, respectively) for S. epidermidis biofilms, and (5.1, 5.2 and 5.0 log CFU/ml, respectively) for P. aeruginosa biofilm. Sonication detected higher CFU counts (7.5 log CFU/ml) for S. epidermidis; (p<0.05) and 6.5 log for P. aeruginosa biofilm (p <0.05). Concordant results were detected with isothermal microcalorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. In conclusion, the CFU count after treatment of S. epidermidis or P. aeruginosa biofilms with EDTA and DTT was similar to those observed after 0.9% saline used as control. In contrast, sonication was superior to chemical methods for biofilm dislodgment and detection of microorganisms in sonication fluid. In conclusion, our study showed that sonication is superior to chemical method to dislodge bacterial biofilm from artificial surface and should be considered as standard diagnostic method for biofilm detection in implant-associated infections.