bioRxiv · 10.1101/598789
A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time
Abstract
Divisive normalization has long been used to account for computations in various neural processes and behaviours. The model proposes that inputs into a neural system are divisively normalized by the total activity of the system. More recently, dynamical versions of divisive normalization have been shown to account for how neural activity evolves over time in value-based decision making. Despite its ubiquity, divisive normalization has not been studied in decisions that require evidence to be integrated over time. Such decisions are important when we do not have all the information available at once. A key feature of such decisions is how evidence is weighted over time, known as the integration kernel. Here we provide a formal expression for the integration kernel in divisive normalization, and show that divisive normalization can quantitatively account for the perceptual decision making behaviour of 133 human participants, performing as well as the state-of-the-art Drift Diffusion Model, the predominant model for perceptual evidence accumulation.
Source connections
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Keung, W., Hagen, T. A., Wilson, R. C.. 2019-04-05. A divisive model of evidence accumulation explains uneven weighting of evidence over time. https://doi.org/10.1101/598789
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.