bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/589051

Knowledge of Chagas disease in Latin American migrant population living in Japan and factors associated with knowledge level

Abstract

BackgroundChagas disease (CD), typically confined to the Latin America (LA) region, is emerging as a global health problem. In Japan, as in the rest of world, the under-diagnose rate of CD is alarmingly high. Various studies have highlighted the importance of informed knowledge in the seeking behavior. Educational integrative activities, with consideration for socio-cultural factors, can help increase the knowledge of the participants. There has been no studies that analyze the difference in knowledge, before and after these educational activities. This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the knowledge, behavior and attitude toward CD among LA migrants in Japan and to evaluate the effectiveness of the community educational activity in increasing knowledge of CD.\n\nMethodologyThis cross-sectional study involved two questionnaires to analyze the knowledge of the LA migrant participants before and after the community activity (CA) in four cities in Japan (Oizumi, Suzuka, Hadano, and Nagoya).\n\nPrincipal FindingsA total of 75 participants were enrolled, predominantly Bolivians from hyperendemic areas. The baseline knowledge of CD was low. However, most of them were familiar with the disease although less than 10% of them had been tested for CD before. Living in Japan for more than 10 years and previously being tested for CD were the factors associated with better knowledge. The conducted CA significantly improved the knowledge of the participants. They associated the term \"Chagas\" mostly with fear and concern. In contrast to other studies, the level of stigmatization was low. The barriers in care seeking behavior were language, migration process and difficulties to access to the healthcare system.\n\nConclusionEducational activities with integrative approach are useful to increase knowledge of CD. The activity brings the possibility to explore not only the level of knowledge, but also to reveal the experience and to understand the needs of the people at risk.\n\nAuthor SummaryThough the incident rate of Chagas disease (CD) has fallen, more than 7 million people are affected worldwide. The CD prevalence is under-estimated because just 1% of these affected people can access to the diagnosis and treatment. This situation is maintaining mainly for the lack of implication of socio-cultural factors in the interventions to decrease the burden of the disease. Educational activities with integral approach are useful to increase the knowledge of the people at risk. People that have being tested for CD before or living in Japan for more than 10 years have better knowledge about the disease, suggesting the importance of knowledge in the seeking behavior. The authors recommend the implementation of educational activities with integral approach as a strategy to improves the knowledge of Chagas disease among Latin America migrants in Japan.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Iglesias-Rodriguez, I. M., Mizukami, S., Manh, D. H., Thuan, T. M., Justiniano, H. A., Miura, S., Ito, G., Huy, N. T., Hirayama, K.. 2019-03-27. Knowledge of Chagas disease in Latin American migrant population living in Japan and factors associated with knowledge level. https://doi.org/10.1101/589051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Auditing Biomedical Literature with Blinded AI Peer Review: Where Peer Review Works, Where It Fails, and How to Strengthen It

Biomedical publishing has grown more than elevenfold since 1991, outstripping human peer review. Unblinded language models cannot audit this literature objectively because they recognize famous authors and journals from training memory. We built BARS (Blinded AI Review System), an automated referee that strips titles, author names, institutions, journal headers, and dates before grading full-text manuscripts on a 10-point scale covering methods, evidence, biology, and reproducibility. We used BARS to generate 1,874 blind reviews across 1,714 unique papers. BARS passed 100% of verified sound controls, caught 77% to 91% of internally flawed papers, eliminated a +0.35-point prestige boost, and more than doubled human referee consistency. Across 320 recent open-access articles (2020-2025) from eight fields, 54% failed on core scientific rigor (<5.0/10; 41% excluding megajournals). Revision at selective journals improved preprints more than twice as much as revision at commercial megajournals (+0.62 vs. +0.30 points; baseline-adjusted p = 0.033), and BARS recalled 98% of unresolved human referee critiques across 100 open-review papers. Across 915 date-blinded papers from 1991 to 2025, average scores fell from 7.6/10 to 5.8/10 as megajournals and template database studies expanded. Blinded self-audits of 238 papers by two senior authors -- and of this manuscript itself -- caught real statistical, control, and table errors in our own work. At four cents per paper, BARS offers a practical quality check for authors, journals, and readers (https://veg.github.io/BARS/).

scientific communication and education↗

From Problems to Solutions: How Self-Questions Drive Strong Scientific Reasoning

Metacognition, or awareness and control of thinking, is essential for problem solving because it helps solvers select strategies for learning and decide when to enact them (planning), check their understanding in the moment (monitoring), and assess effectiveness of solutions and learning strategies (evaluating). Most studies that examine metacognition do so retrospectively, leaving a critical gap in how metacognition is used in-the-moment for problem solving. In this study, we utilized a think-aloud interview approach to capture and characterize the metacognitive skills that senior undergraduate life science students at three institution types in the United States used spontaneously while solving challenging biology problems. We found that the students (n = 39) displayed a wide variety and quantity of monitoring, some evaluating, and nearly no planning skills while creating a solution backed with high-quality reasoning. Students frequently used self-questions to monitor and evaluate their thinking. We found that self-questioning is a critical skill for generating solutions, but it only moves problem solving forward if the student asks and correctly answers the self-question out loud. This study illustrates how self-questioning and other metacognitive regulation skills provide links to bridge the gap between a student's prior knowledge and specific features of a challenging problem. Based on our student data, we conceptualized a model of metacognitive phases during problem solving with high-quality reasoning. Finally, we present a self-question scaffold to facilitate the proposed phases (planning, monitoring, reasoning, and evaluating) so educators can equip students with metacognitive and scientific reasoning tools for effective problem solving.

scientific communication and education↗

Preprint solicitation as a natural experiment in scholarly publishing

Preprinting is a growing and increasingly recognized mechanism for scientific communication and productivity and a way to facilitate global access to science. The interplay of preprinting practices with formal peer-reviewed publication is an open question that is now tractable to targeted analysis. Here, we take advantage of nearly a decade of preprint solicitation at Proceedings B to address this question, which offers a quasi-experimental setting for comparing outcomes for solicited preprints and traditionally submitted manuscripts. We used submission records from 15,368 manuscripts from 2018-2024 to assess whether preprint solicitation affects acceptance rates, journal scope, author geographic diversity, and post-publication uptake. Solicited manuscripts were accepted at nearly twice the rate of traditional submissions and received more downloads and citations after publication. Submission topics were broadly similar between the two routes, though solicited manuscripts showed marginally greater subject diversity. Geographic disparities favoring the Global North persisted, but acceptance rates for solicited manuscripts converged across regions, narrowing the gap seen in traditional submissions. These findings extend earlier work on this initiative and indicate that editor-driven solicitation can identify high-quality preprints, broaden geographic representation, and increase research visibility, offering a replicable model for journals seeking to diversify authorship while maintaining editorial standards.

scientific communication and education↗