bioRxiv ScienceSearch

bioRxiv · 10.1101/589051

Knowledge of Chagas disease in Latin American migrant population living in Japan and factors associated with knowledge level

Abstract

BackgroundChagas disease (CD), typically confined to the Latin America (LA) region, is emerging as a global health problem. In Japan, as in the rest of world, the under-diagnose rate of CD is alarmingly high. Various studies have highlighted the importance of informed knowledge in the seeking behavior. Educational integrative activities, with consideration for socio-cultural factors, can help increase the knowledge of the participants. There has been no studies that analyze the difference in knowledge, before and after these educational activities. This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the knowledge, behavior and attitude toward CD among LA migrants in Japan and to evaluate the effectiveness of the community educational activity in increasing knowledge of CD.\n\nMethodologyThis cross-sectional study involved two questionnaires to analyze the knowledge of the LA migrant participants before and after the community activity (CA) in four cities in Japan (Oizumi, Suzuka, Hadano, and Nagoya).\n\nPrincipal FindingsA total of 75 participants were enrolled, predominantly Bolivians from hyperendemic areas. The baseline knowledge of CD was low. However, most of them were familiar with the disease although less than 10% of them had been tested for CD before. Living in Japan for more than 10 years and previously being tested for CD were the factors associated with better knowledge. The conducted CA significantly improved the knowledge of the participants. They associated the term \"Chagas\" mostly with fear and concern. In contrast to other studies, the level of stigmatization was low. The barriers in care seeking behavior were language, migration process and difficulties to access to the healthcare system.\n\nConclusionEducational activities with integrative approach are useful to increase knowledge of CD. The activity brings the possibility to explore not only the level of knowledge, but also to reveal the experience and to understand the needs of the people at risk.\n\nAuthor SummaryThough the incident rate of Chagas disease (CD) has fallen, more than 7 million people are affected worldwide. The CD prevalence is under-estimated because just 1% of these affected people can access to the diagnosis and treatment. This situation is maintaining mainly for the lack of implication of socio-cultural factors in the interventions to decrease the burden of the disease. Educational activities with integral approach are useful to increase the knowledge of the people at risk. People that have being tested for CD before or living in Japan for more than 10 years have better knowledge about the disease, suggesting the importance of knowledge in the seeking behavior. The authors recommend the implementation of educational activities with integral approach as a strategy to improves the knowledge of Chagas disease among Latin America migrants in Japan.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Iglesias-Rodriguez, I. M., Mizukami, S., Manh, D. H., Thuan, T. M., Justiniano, H. A., Miura, S., Ito, G., Huy, N. T., Hirayama, K.. 2019-03-27. Knowledge of Chagas disease in Latin American migrant population living in Japan and factors associated with knowledge level. https://doi.org/10.1101/589051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education

Lower limb chronic edema management program: Perspectives of disengaged patients on challenges, enablers and barriers to program attendance and adherence

BackgroundChronic edema (CO) is a progressive, physically disfiguring and currently incurable condition. A multifaceted program has been recommended to manage the swelling. However, there is little evidence investigating patients perspectives following the program, particularly for those who have poor adherence or are disengaged.\n\nAimTo investigate the perceived challenges faced by disengaged participants with lower limb CO by identifying their enablers and barriers to participating in a Physiotherapy CO program.\n\nMethodAn exploratory qualitative approach was used. A purposive sampling strategy was adopted to recruit participants. Those with more than three months swelling and who had low adherence or attendance (disengaged) to the CO program were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews with six participants from a CO clinic in a tertiary hospital were conducted. Data was thematically analyzed and findings in terms of enablers and barriers were subsequently reflected in the light of a theoretical framework.\n\nResultsAll six participants were morbidly obese (BMI 47 {+/-} 4 kg/m2) with multiple chronic comorbidities. Enablers and barriers detected included physical, psychological and social factors that interplay to present multidimensional challenges that influence the participants adjustment to managing their CO. For the disengaged participants in this study, their under-managed lower limb CO was a progression towards being housebound and having a gradually increasing level of disability.\n\nConclusionChronic edema, if left unmanaged, can have a profound debilitating impact on the individual permanently. Understanding the challenges faced by patients with lower limb CO has implications for developing a more patient-centered multidisciplinary approach to clinical practice and suggests the need for further research.

scientific communication and education

Genetic research at the intersection of gender identity, sexual orientation, and mental health: community attitudes and recommendations for researchers

Biological sex is an important factor in mental health, and a non-binary view of how variation in sex and gender influence mental health represents a new research frontier that may yield new insights. The recent acceleration of research into sexual orientation, gender identity, and mental health has generally been conducted without sufficient understanding of the opinions of sexual and gender minorities (SGM) toward this research. We surveyed 768 individuals, with an enrichment of LGBTQ+ stakeholders, for their opinions regarding genetic research of SGM and mental health. We found that the key predictors of attitudes toward genetic research specifically on SGM are 1) general attitudes toward genetic and mental health research 2) tolerance of SGM and associated behaviors 3) non-cisgender stakeholder status and 4) age of the respondent. Non-heterosexual stakeholder status was significantly associated with increased willingness to participate in genetic research if a biological basis for gender identity were discovered. We also found that non-stakeholders with a low tolerance for SGM indicated their SGM views would be positively updated if science showed a biological basis for their behaviors and identities. These findings represent an important first step in understanding and engaging the LGBTQ+ stakeholder community in the context of genetic research.

scientific communication and education