bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/577148

Swallowing and chewing difficulties are associated with presynaptic dopaminergic dysfunction and greater non-motor symptom burden in early drug-naïve Parkinson’s patients

Polychronis, S.·Dervenoulas, G.·Yousaf, T.·Niccolini, F.·Pagano, G.·Politis, M.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BackgroundThe underlying pathophysiology of swallowing and chewing difficulties is multifactorial and evidence clarifying the precise mechanisms are scarce. Dysfunction in dopamine-related and non-dopamine-related pathways, changes in cortical networks related with swallowing and peripheral mechanisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of swallowing difficulties. We aimed at investigating whether swallowing and chewing difficulties are associated with presynaptic dopaminergic deficits, faster motor symptom progression and cognitive decline in a population of early drug-naive patients with Parkinsons disease.\n\nMethodsBy exploring the database of Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative we identified forty-nine early drug-naive Parkinsons disease patients with swallowing difficulties. Swallowing and chewing impairment was identified with SCOPA-AUT question 1 (answer regularly) and was assessed with MDS-UPDRS Part-II, Item 2.3 (Chewing and Swallowing). We compared Parkinsons disease patients with swallowing and chewing difficulties to Parkinsons disease patients without difficulties, and investigated differences in striatal [123I]FP-CIT single photon emission computed tomography levels. Using Cox proportional hazards analyses, we also evaluated whether swallowing impairment can predict motor deterioration and cognitive dysfunction.\n\nResultsPatients with Parkinsons disease, harbored a greater deterioration regarding motor and non-motor symptoms and decreased [123I]FP-CIT binding when compared with patients without swallowing and chewing impairment. Higher burden of swallowing and chewing dysfunction (MDS-UPDRS-II, item 2.3) was correlated with lower [123I]FP-CIT uptakes within the striatum (rs=-0.157; P=0.002) and the caudate (rs=-0.156; P=0.002). The presence of swallowing and chewing difficulties was not a predictor of motor progression (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.143, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.848-1.541; P=0.379) or cognitive decline (HR: 1.294, 95% CI: 0.616-2.719; P=0.496).\n\nConclusionsSwallowing and chewing impairment is associated with decreased presynaptic dopaminergic integrity within caudate and greater motor and non-motor symptoms burden in early drug-naive PD.\n\nAuthor contributionsS.P. and M.P. conceived the study, conceptualized the experimental design. M.P., S.P., G.D. and G.P. gave input to experimental design. S.P. wrote the first draft and prepared the manuscript. G.P. and S.P. performed the statistical analysis. G.P., G.D., T.Y. and S.P. generated the figures. F.N., M.P., S.P., G.P., G.D. interpreted the data. All authors revised and gave input to the manuscript.\n\nFinancial Disclosure StatementData used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/data). For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org. PPMI - a public-private partnership - is sponsored by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinsons Research (MJFF) and is co-funded by MJFF, Abbvie, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Covance, Eli Lilly & Co., F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd., GE Healthcare, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Lundbeck, Merck, MesoScale, Piramal, Pfizer and UCB.PPMI. Industry partners are contributing to PPMI through financial and in-kind donations and are playing a lead role in providing feedback on study parameters through the Industry Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB). Through close interaction with the study, the ISAB is positioned to inform the selection and review of potential progression markers that could be used in clinical testing.\n\nMr. Polychronis, Dr. Dervenoulas, Ms Yousaf, Dr. Niccolini, Dr. Pagano and Prof. Politis report no disclosures.\n\nPotential Conflicts of InterestNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

neurosciencePreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Polychronis, S., Dervenoulas, G., Yousaf, T., Niccolini, F., Pagano, G., Politis, M.. 2019-03-14. Swallowing and chewing difficulties are associated with presynaptic dopaminergic dysfunction and greater non-motor symptom burden in early drug-naïve Parkinson’s patients. https://doi.org/10.1101/577148

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Distinguishing evidence accumulation from choice confidence in neural signatures of perceptual decision making

Human electrophysiology research has identified the centro-parietal positivity (CPP) as an apparent neural correlate of sensory evidence accumulation during perceptual decision-making. The CPP has also been shown to closely scale with subjective confidence. Coupled with the fact of its domain-generality and lack of choice selectivity, this observation raises the possibility that the CPP might in fact trace subjective confidence rather than cumulative evidence, two quantities that are closely correlated in most experiments. To disentangle confidence from cumulative evidence, we used predictive cues with 80% validity to manipulate prior expectations of participants during a contrast discrimination task while recording electroencephalography (EEG). At the time of decision termination, confidence is expected to reach a higher level for validly cued versus invalidly cued choices, whereas the opposite would be expected of a cumulative evidence signal due to biased decision starting points. As expected, valid cues led to faster, more accurate and more confident responses compared to invalid and neutral cues. At the neural level, cues produced systematic increases in preparation of the expected action prior to evidence onset as indexed by premotor mu/beta activity, consistent with cue-biased criterion adjustments. The pre-response CPP amplitude was significantly reduced for validly cued choices and the effect remained even when matching for confidence. Together these findings suggest that the CPP is not a direct read-out of subjective confidence, but an evidence accumulation signal that contributes to both decision formation and confidence estimation.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

A Neurocompliant Ionic Conductive Hydrogel Orchestrates Glial and Vascular Remodeling to Mitigate Traumatic Brain Injury

Developing conductive scaffolds for neural regeneration is often hindered by the cytotoxicity and mechanical mismatch inherent to conventional electronic fillers. Here, we report an ultrasoft ionically conductive hydrogel engineered by grafting choline-based bioionic liquids (BIL) onto fish gelatin (FiBGel). Systematic optimization yields brain-mimetic conductivity (0.25-0.68 S/m), elastic moduli (0.6-0.9 kPa), and physiological water content (72-81%). In 3D culture, the matrix drives spontaneous neurogenesis, achieving ~90% MAP2+ neurons with robust calcium signaling, while concurrently supporting endothelial network formation. We report the first intracerebral administration of a BIL hydrogel, demonstrating remarkable biocompatibility and immunomodulation. In a traumatic brain injury model, a single FiBGel dose halves reactive astrogliosis, enhances cortical revascularization, and limits lesion cavity expansion. Leveraging an FDA-recognized micronutrient, FiBGel offers a translatable strategy that integrates neuromechanics, conductivity, immune modulation, and vascular support within one injectable scaffold for minimally invasive treatment of brain injuries.

neuroscience↗
bioRxiv2026

Changes in anterior cingulate connectivity associated with response to antidepressant treatment for major depressive disorder

Background: Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) involving the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the hippocampal formation has been implicated in major depressive disorder (MDD) and antidepressant response. However, it remains unclear whether connectivity changes in distinct ACC subdivisions and hippocampal formation reflect general antidepressant effects or are specifically associated with clinical improvement. Methods: Forty-one, unmedicated adults with MDD underwent functional MRI before and after 8 weeks of sertraline or bupropion treatment. Seed-based rsFC analyses examined subgenual ACC (sgACC), pregenual ACC (pgACC), dorsal ACC (dACC), and hippocampal formation connectivity. Linear mixed-effects models tested whether connectivity change was associated with treatment response, remission, and dimensional improvement in depressive symptoms. Results: Thirty individuals (73.2%) responded to treatment and 26 (63.4%) achieved remission. Overall, rsFC decreased pre- to post-treatment between (1) dACC and pgACC (but not sgACC and hippocampal formation) and (2) cortical regions primarily involving default mode and frontoparietal networks. When considering treatment response, differences in sgACC and pgACC connectivity with temporal and inferior frontal regions emerged (increased in responders vs. decreased in non-responders). Remission was similarly associated with increased sgACC connectivity with temporal and prefrontal regions, and increased sgACC connectivity with temporal cortical regions related to greater reductions in depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Antidepressant treatment was associated with distinct patterns of ACC connectivity change, with general reductions in dorsal and pregenual connectivity but increases in subgenual and pregenual connectivity associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Findings suggest that changes in sgACC/pgACC connectivity are particularly relevant to antidepressant treatment response. Keywords: Major depressive disorder; Resting-state functional connectivity; Anterior cingulate cortex; Antidepressant treatment; Treatment response; Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex.

neuroscience↗