The role of strigolactones in regulation of stomatal conductance and plant-pathogen interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract

Strigolactones are a group of phytohormones that control shoot branching in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, in recent years they have been shown to affect many other plant processes. We previously showed that the strigolactone perception mutant more axillary branches 2 (max2) has increased susceptibility to plant pathogenic bacteria as a result of more open stomata as well as alterations in hormonal signalling. Here we show that both, strigolactone biosynthesis- (max3 and max4), and perception mutants (max2 and dwarf14) are significantly more sensitive to Pseudomonas syringae DC3000. Moreover, in response to P. syringae infection, high levels of SA accumulated in max2 and this mutant was ozone sensitive. To search for the mechanisms that could explain pathogen- and ozone sensitivity we performed gene expression analysis and several different assays that explore the function of guard cells and regulation of guard cell signalling.\n\nTreatments with GR24 (a strigolactone analogue) resulted in very modest changes in defence-related gene expression. In contrast, guard cell function was clearly impaired in max2 and depending on the assay used, also in max3, max4 and d14 mutants. Moreover, stomatal responses to stimuli that cause stomatal closure in wild-type plants (darkness, high CO2 and ABA) were analysed in the strigolactone mutants. In darkness both strigolactone biosynthesis and perception mutants showed reduced stomatal closure, whereas the response to high CO2 was impaired only in max2 and d14. The response to ABA was not impaired in any of the mutants. To position the role of MAX2 in the guard cell signalling network, max2 was crossed with mutants defective in ABA biosynthesis (aba2), in guard cell ABA signalling (ost1) and a scaffold protein required for proper ion channel activity (ghr1). The stomatal conductance of double mutants was consistently higher than the corresponding single mutants, suggesting that MAX2 acts in a signalling pathway that functions in parallel to the well characterized guard cell ABA signalling pathway. We propose that the impaired defence responses of max2 is related to more open stomata that allows increased entry of bacteria or air pollutants like ozone. Furthermore, as MAX2 appears to act in a specific branch of guard cell signalling (related to CO2 signalling), this protein could be one of the elusive components that allow guard cells to distinguish between different environmental conditions.