No trace of phase: Corticomotor excitability is not tuned by phase of pericentral mu-rhythm

Abstract

BackgroundThe motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor hand area (M1-HAND) show substantial inter-trial variability. Pericentral mu-rhythm oscillations, might contribute to inter-trial variability. Recent studies targeting mu-activity based on real-time electroencephalography (EEG) reported an influence of mu-power and mu-phase on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in a preselected group with strong pericentral mu-activity. Other studies that determined mu-power or mu-phase based on post-hoc trial sorting according in non-preselected individuals were largely negative.\n\nObjectivesTo reassess if cortico-spinal activity is modulated by the mu-rhythm, we applied single-pulse TMS to the M1-HAND conditional on the phase of the intrinsically expressed pericentral mu-rhythm in 14 non-preselected healthy young participants.\n\nMethodsTMS was given at 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees of the mu-phase. Based on the absence of effects of mu-phase or mu-power when analyzing the mean MEP amplitudes, we also computed a linear mixed effects model, which included mu-phase, mu-power, inter-stimulus interval (ISIs) as fixed effects, treating the subject factor as a random effect.\n\nResultsMixed model analysis revealed a significant effect of mu-power and ISI, but no effect of mu-phase and no interactions. MEP amplitude scaled linearly with lower mu-power or longer ISIs, but these modulatory effects were very small relative to inter-trial MEP variability.\n\nConclusionOur largely negative results are in agreement with previous offline TMS-EEG studies and point to a possible influence of ISI. Future research needs to clarify under which circumstances the responsiveness of human the M1-HAND to TMS depends on the synchronicity with mu-power and mu-phase.\n\nHighlightsO_LIPhase-triggered TMS at four distinct phases of the ongoing mu-oscillations is technically feasible in non-preselected young volunteers\nC_LIO_LITargeting the ongoing mu-activity did not reveal consistent modulatory effect of mu-phase on corticospinal excitability in a non-preselected group\nC_LIO_LIMixed-effects analysis revealed a weak but significant effect of pre-stimulus mu-power and ISI on corticospinal excitability\nC_LI