bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/503524

A biophysical computational model for memory trace transfer from hippocampus to neocortex

Abstract

The hippocampus plays important roles in memory formation and retrieval through sharp-wave-ripples. Recent studies have shown that certain neuron populations in the prefrontal cortex exhibit coordinated reactivations during awake ripple events. Also, the reactivation seems stronger during initial awake learning. These experimental findings suggest that the awake ripple is an important biomarker, through which the hippocampus interacts with the neocortex to assist the memory formation and retrieval. However, the computational mechanisms of this ripple based hippocampal-cortical coordination are still not clear. In this work, we build a biophysical model that includes both CA1 and layer V networks of the prefrontal cortex to investigate the possible mechanisms, by which the memory traces in the hippocampus can be transferred to prefrontal cortex. We first show that the local field potentials generated in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex exhibit ripple range activities that are consistent with the recent experimental studies. Then, we find that the sequence information stored in the hippocampus can be successfully transferred to the prefrontal cortex recurrent networks through spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) and sequence replays. Further, we investigate the mechanisms of memory retrieval in the PFC network. Our findings suggest that the stored memory traces in the prefrontal cortex network can be retrieved through two different mechanisms, namely the cell-specific input and non-specific spontaneous background noise. Finally, we show that more SWRs and an optimal background noise level will both contribute to better sequence reactivations in the PFC network during memory retrieval. Our study presents a possible explanation for the memory trace transfer from the hippocampus to the neocortex through ripple coupling in awake states and reports two different mechanisms by which the stored memory traces can be successfully retrieved.\n\nAuthor SummaryThe hippocampal-cortical interactions have been found to be important for learning and memory. Recent experimental work reports interesting coordinations between the hippocampus and neocortex during ripple events in quiet awake states. Investigating this phenomena is critical for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms by which hippocampus contributes to the long-term memory formation in the neocortex. To this end, we build a biophysical computational model for both the hippocampal CA1 and prefrontal cortex networks. We demonstrate that under STDP rule and sequential inputs, the memory traces initially stored in the hippocampus can be transferred to the neocortex through the ripple events. The stored memory traces in the PFC network can be reactivated by two different mechanisms, namely the cell-specific inputs and non-specific background noises. Our study suggests that both the ripple event numbers and the level of background noises jointly determine the quality of memory retrieval during reactivation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Liu, X., Kuzum, D.. 2018-12-21. A biophysical computational model for memory trace transfer from hippocampus to neocortex. https://doi.org/10.1101/503524

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗