The California Environmental DNA \"CALeDNA\" Program

Meyer, R.; Curd, E. E.; Schweizer, T.; Gold, Z.; Ruiz Ramos, D.; Shirazi, S.; Kandlikar, G.; Kwan, W.-Y.; Lin, M.; Friese, A.; Moberg-Parker, J.; Munguia Ramos, M.; Shapiro, B.; Sexton, J.; Pipes, L.; Garcia Vedrenne, A.; Palacios Mejia, M.; Aronson, E.; Moore, T.; Nielsen, R.; Lewin, H.; Barber, P.; Wall, J.; Kraft, N.; Wayne, R.

doi:10.1101/503383

Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/503383

The California Environmental DNA \"CALeDNA\" Program

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Global change is leading to habitat shifts that threaten species persistence throughout Californias unique ecosystems. Baseline biodiversity data provide opportunities for ecosystems to be managed for community complexity and connectivity. In 2017, the University of California Conservation Genomics Consortium launched the California Environmental DNA (CALeDNA) program, a community science initiative monitoring Californias biodiversity through environmental DNA (eDNA)--DNA shed from organisms through fur, mucus, spores, pollen, etc. Community scientists collect soil and sediment samples, then researchers analyze the eDNA in the samples and share results with the public. The results are catalogues of thousands of organisms per sample, ranging from microbes to mammals. The CALeDNA website presents biodiversity inventories in a platform designed for the public and researchers alike, as well as user-friendly analysis tools and educational modules. Here, we present CALeDNA as a scalable community science framework that can harmonize with future biodiversity research and education initiatives.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and education Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Meyer, R., Curd, E. E., Schweizer, T., Gold, Z., Ruiz Ramos, D., Shirazi, S., Kandlikar, G., Kwan, W.-Y., Lin, M., Friese, A., Moberg-Parker, J., Munguia Ramos, M., Shapiro, B., Sexton, J., Pipes, L., Garcia Vedrenne, A., Palacios Mejia, M., Aronson, E., Moore, T., Nielsen, R., Lewin, H., Barber, P., Wall, J., Kraft, N., Wayne, R.. 2019-01-04. The California Environmental DNA \"CALeDNA\" Program. https://doi.org/10.1101/503383

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2019

Antibiotics and food in the American press

The emergence of antimicrobial resistant infections from food is well documented in the scientific literature but, in this kind of matter, the public opinion is an important policy driver and is vastly forged by traditional media. Here, we propose a text mining study through about 500 articles from two reference daily U.S. newspapers to assess the media coverage of this issue. Our results indicate that, since the middle of the 80s, the two journals considered here adopted a very different narrative around the issue, echoing civil society concerns in one case and the official discourse in the other.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2019

Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses

Email is the primary means of communication for scientists. However, scientific authors change email address over time. Using a new method, we have calculated that approximately 18% of all authors contact email addresses in MEDLINE are invalid. While an unfortunate number, it is, however, lower than previously estimated. To mitigate this problem, institutions should provide email forwarding and scientific authors should use more stable email addresses. In fact, a steadily growing share already use free private email addresses: 32% of all new addresses in MEDLINE in 2018 were of this kind.

scientific communication and education↗