bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/466029

Homeostatic Controllers Compensating for Growth and Perturbations

Ruoff, P.·Agafonov, O.·Tveit, D. M.·Thorsen, K.·Drengstig, T.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Cells and organisms have developed homeostatic mechanisms to maintain internal stabilities which protect them against a changing environment. How cellular growth and homeostasis interact is still not well understood, but of increasing interest to the synthetic and molecular biology community where molecular control circuits are sought and tried to maintain homeostasis that opposes the diluting effects of cell growth. In this paper we describe the performance of four negative feedback (inflow) controllers, which, for different observed growth laws (time-dependent increase in the cellular volume V) are able to compensate for various time-dependent removals of the controlled variable A. The four implementations of integral control are based on zero-order, first-order autocatalytic, second-order (antithetic), and derepressing inhibition kinetics. All controllers behave ideal in the sense that they for step-wise perturbations in V and A are able to drive the controlled variable precisely back to the controllers theoretical set-point [Formula] The applied increase in cellular volume includes linear, exponential and saturating growth and reflect experimentally observed growth laws of single cell organisms and other cell types. During the increase in V, additional linear or exponential time-dependent perturbations which remove A are applied, and controllers are tested with respect to their ability to compensate for both the increase in volume V and the applied perturbations removing A. Our results show that the way how integral control is kinetically implemented and the structure of the negative feedback loop are essential determinants of a controllers performance. The results provide a ranking between the four tested controller types. Considering exponential volume increases together with an exponentially increasing removal rate of A controllers based on derepression kinetics perform best, but break down when the control-inhibitors concentration gets too low. The first-order autocatalytic controller is able to defend time-dependent exponential growth and removals in A, but generally with a certain offset below its theoretical set-point [Formula] The controllers based on zero-order and second-order (antithetic) integral feedback can only manage linear increases in V and removals in A, in dependence of the controllers aggressiveness. Our results provide a theoretical basis what controller kinetics are needed in order to compensate for different growth laws.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

biophysicsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ruoff, P., Agafonov, O., Tveit, D. M., Thorsen, K., Drengstig, T.. 2018-11-08. Homeostatic Controllers Compensating for Growth and Perturbations. https://doi.org/10.1101/466029

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Autonomous Homeostatic Synthetic Cells via Self-Gating DNA Nanopores

Homeostasis is a fundamental hallmark of living organisms, arising from the complex interplay between biochemical reactions and regulatory feedback systems. Reconstituting such self-regulating behaviour in minimal synthetic cells enables continuous, persistent operation of biochemical reactions for extended amount of time. In this work, we demonstrate a minimal homeostatic synthetic cell capable of autonomous flux regulation using DNA nanotechnology and bottom-up synthetic biology. Our homeostatic architecture consists of Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) equipped with gated DNA nanopores, encapsulated in vitro transcription (IVT) machinery, and an RNA degradation system. We achieve homeostasis under varying external chemical stimuli specifically varying concentrations of rNTPs by implementing a negative feedback loop between rNTP influx and RNA production. In our system, DNA nanopores facilitate the influx of rNTPs from the external environment, driving internal transcription. Crucially, the transcription process generates RNA "blockers" designed to bind and gate the DNA nanopores, thereby attenuating further rNTP influx. Our system is dynamic as encapsulated RNases slowly degrade the RNA blockers, allowing the pores to reopen as blocker concentration goes down. We first characterise the functionality and gating efficiency of the DNA nanopores using both pre-synthesised and in situ produced DNA and RNA blockers. We then demonstrate that rNTP flux through these pores is sufficient to drive IVT within the GUVs. Finally, by integrating these modules, we demonstrate robust homeostasis: the system maintains a steady-state level of RNA production for up to 16 hours. By harnessing the controllability of negative feedback loop, we demonstrate thresholding of the homeostasis level using single-stranded regulator DNA. This work establishes a versatile framework for engineering adaptive and self-sustaining responsive nanomaterials and synthetic cell chassis.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

A Generic Numbering Scheme for TMEM16 Scramblases

The TMEM16 family of calcium-activated phospholipid scramblases (CaPLSs) and chloride channels (CaCCs) performs diverse physiological functions that include regulation of blood coagulation and apoptotic signaling, through a shared ten-transmembrane-helix (TM) architecture organized around a hydrophilic lipid-translocating groove. Mechanistic studies of TMEM16 family members have been hampered by the absence of a unified positional reference framework that would permit direct comparison of structurally equivalent residues across paralogs with different sequence numbering systems. Here we introduce a generic numbering scheme for TMEM16 scramblases (GNS-TMEM16), modeled on the Ballesteros & Weinstein system established for class A G protein-coupled receptors. A reference alignment (TMEM16-RA) was constructed from twelve human and mouse TMEM16 scramblases (TMEM16C/D/E/F/G/J) using structure-based ClustalW alignment of the ten TM helices. From this alignment, a TM-specific reference residue (TsRR) was identified for each helix by hierarchical application of three criteria: (1) 100% conservation in the core TMEM16-RA; (2) conservation in an augmented reference alignment (TMEM16-ARA) incorporating a group of phylogenetically more distant homologs composed of nhTMEM16, afTMEM16, TMEM16K, TMEM16A, and TMEM16B; and (3) structural and functional considerations, including helix-perturbing character, groove localization, conserved motif membership, and central TM position. The resulting ten TsRRs are Y1.50, W2.50, R3.50, E4.50, F5.50, P6.50, E7.50, D8.50, W9.50, and E10.50, and are illustrated in mTMEM16F. Each residue is assigned the identifier N.m(k), where N is the TM number, m is the position relative to the TsRR (for which m = 50), and k is the absolute sequence number. Loop residues receive dual identifiers referenced to the TsRRs of both flanking helices. Application of the GNS-TMEM16 is illustrated with the comparisons of the groove-opening measurements using pairwise distances between residues identified by their N.m indices to be corresponding across mTMEM16F, afTMEM16, and nhTMEM16. The results bring to light the advantages of corresponding residues identification in different TMEM16 proteins and show that the mammalian scramblase undergoes substantially larger separation at the extracellular groove entrance than either fungal homolog. Comparison of mutagenesis data guided by N.m correspondence shows at the conserved (E3.55,R6.26) salt-bridge locus, Ala substitution reduces activity more than 100-fold in nhTMEM16 but less than 2-fold in afTMEM16, illustrating that the GNS identifies structural equivalence of position without implying functional equivalence of the residue, which is a distinct advantage of GNS in providing mechanistic interpretation across paralogs. Also described is a protocol for extending the GNS-TMEM16 to uncharacterized protein sequences, including AlphaFold-predicted models, using structural superposition to mTMEM16F. Thus, the presented GNS-TMEM16 provides a stable positional reference for the integration and comparative analysis of structural, computational, and functional data across the TMEM16 family, utilizing a construction strategy applicable to yet other polytopic membrane protein families sharing a common transmembrane fold.

biophysics↗
bioRxiv2026

An agent-based 3D model of non-genetic adaptation in cancer tissues under electrical, mechanical, and hypoxic stress

Non-genetic adaptation enables cancer cells to alter their phenotype under stress without requiring new mutations. However, the mechanisms by which electrical, mechanical, and hypoxic cues combine to shape this process in 3D tissues remain poorly understood. This work presents an agent-based tumor model that integrates vascular oxygen supply, a globally imposed electric field, mechanically mediated crowding and compression cues, phenotype transitions, cell growth, mitosis, death, and inheritance of adaptive memory across division. The simulated tumors exhibit a three-stage trajectory consisting of necrosis onset, transient collapse of live mass, and partial regrowth accompanied by progressive accumulation of adapted cells. Continuous electrical stimulation produces a dose-dependent reduction in live mass while markedly increasing the adapted fraction, with comparatively limited changes in final necrotic burden. This response is strongly conditioned by mechanics and reshapes (and is reshaped by) adaptive capacity. Pulsed stimulation further shows that, in the model, electric field amplitude and temporal schedule jointly determine memory phenomena, phenotypic diversification, and growth recovery. These results show that coupling local oxygen availability, mechanical constraints, electrical forcing, and history-dependent phenotype transitions can generate distinct tissue-level patterns of phenotypic heterogeneity. Both stimulus magnitude and temporal protocol influenced the resulting population structure, suggesting that the history of physical stress may be an important determinant of adaptive dynamics in spatially organized tumor models.

biophysics↗