bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/457150

Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma

Abstract

We provide a novel computational framework on how biological and artificial agents can learn to flexibly couple and decouple neural task modules for cognitive processing. In this way, they can address the stability-plasticity dilemma. For this purpose, we combine two prominent computational neuroscience principles, namely Binding by Synchrony and Reinforcement Learning. The model learns to synchronize task-relevant modules, while also learning to desynchronize currently task-irrelevant modules. As a result, old (but currently task-irrelevant) information is protected from overwriting (stability) while new information can be learned quickly in currently task-relevant modules (plasticity). We combine learning to synchronize with several classical learning algorithms (backpropagation, Boltzmann machines, Rescorla-Wagner). For each case, we demonstrate that our combined model has significant computational advantages over the original network in both stability and plasticity. Importantly, the resulting models processing dynamics are also consistent with empirical data and provide empirically testable hypotheses for future MEG/EEG studies.\n\nAuthor summaryArtificial and biological agents alike face a critical trade-off between being sufficiently adaptive to acquiring novel information (plasticity) and retaining older information (stability); this is known as the stability-plasticity dilemma. Previous work on this dilemma has focused either on computationally efficient solutions for artificial agents or on biologically plausible frameworks for biological agents. What is lacking is a solution that combines computational efficiency with biological plausibility. Therefore, the current work proposes a computational framework on the stability-plasticity dilemma that provides empirically testable hypotheses on both neural and behavioral levels. In this framework, neural task modules can be flexibly coupled and decoupled depending on the task at hand. Testing this framework will allow us to gain more insight in how biological agents deal with the stability-plasticity dilemma.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Verbeke, P., Verguts, T.. 2018-10-30. Learning to synchronize: How biological agents can couple neural task modules for dealing with the stability-plasticity dilemma. https://doi.org/10.1101/457150

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Rab10 and Arhgef7 interact to promote axon extension by linking vesicle supply and exocytosis

The formation of functional neural circuits begins with the extension of a single axon by immature neurons. Axon elongation requires an expansion of the plasma membrane that depends on the polarization of vesicle trafficking and exocytosis. It is not completely understood how the increased transport of vesicles into the growing axon is linked to their subsequent insertion into the plasma membrane. An analysis of early stages of neuronal differentiation indicates that an asymmetry in neurite length precedes axon specification and the accumulation of PPVs in the nascent axon. We show that increasing the transport of vesicles in unpolarized neurons is sufficient to promote the extension of additional axons. This effect indicates that an increased supply of vesicles stimulates their subsequent insertion into the membrane to allow neurite growth. The link between vesicle transport and exocytosis is mediated by the interaction of Rab10 with Arhgef7. Rab10 stimulates Arhgef7 activity on PPVs as a GEF for Cdc42b to promote axon extension through exocyst-dependent exocytosis, suggesting that their interaction links the increased supply of PPVs to their exocytosis.

neuroscience↗

Subcellular Spatial Profiling Unveils Links Between Neuritic Plaques with Selective Tau Vulnerability in Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) features widespread extracellular amyloid-{beta} plaques but selective intraneuronal tau accumulation in cortical layers II/III and V, while layer IV remains relatively resistant. Here, we combined subcellular spatial transcriptomics with co-registered A{beta} and pTau immunohistochemistry to determine why neurons exposed to comparable plaque-associated pathology differ in somatic pTau accumulation. Plaque-associated neuritic stress occurred similarly across layers, but layer IV neurons showed attenuated pTau accumulation and reduced somatic expression of a shared neurite-soma stress program involving DCTN1, CALM3, NORAD, and PIN1. Trajectory analysis within layers identified tau-vulnerable and resistant neuronal states implicating calcium signaling, retrograde transport, and lysosomal function. Notably, astrocytic APOE-neuronal LRP1 co-expression increased significantly along the pTau-vulnerable trajectory, and APOE {epsilon}4 was associated with stronger coupling of local plaque pathology to pTau-associated molecular programs. These findings reveal neuronal programs and neuron-glia interactions underlying selective tau vulnerability and resistance in AD, highlighting potential tau-targeting therapeutics.

neuroscience↗

Widespread oscillatory suppression in autism persists in the absence of psychotropic medication.

Purpose: Investigate the neural oscillatory activity associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings in children and adolescents. Compare the corresponding oscillatory power between ASD patients taking psychotropic medication with a drug-naive group. Methods: ASD diagnosis was done using DSM-IV and CARS (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). EEG recordings employed 22 scalp electrodes (10/20 system). ASD vs. neurotypical groups were matched for sex and age (5 females; average age: ~10 years old). We analyzed the resting state (eyes open) EEG power spectrum during ~2-minute recordings. The multitaper FFT method was used to estimate spectral power for the delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. We pooled together data from several electrodes to compute comprehensive power spectra and assess the oscillatory behavior of macro brain regions. Results: We observed widespread (~4Hz - 20Hz) oscillatory suppression comprising the theta, alpha and beta frequency bands. The most widespread and robust ASD-associated power suppression was in the high theta and alpha bands. Delta and gamma bands showed no significant power change for any of the brain regions studied. Results from a subgroup of patients (N = 9) who never used psychotropics confirmed these findings, indicating that they are not an artifact of medication. Conclusion: Suppression in theta, alpha and beta oscillations may offer insights into the neurophysiological underpinnings of autism and could be used as an accessible and comprehensive tool in ASD diagnosis, regardless of the patients being or not on medication.

neuroscience↗