bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/393272

The SUMO conjugation complex self-assembles into nuclear bodies independent of SIZ1 and COP1

Abstract

One sentence SummarySUMO conjugation activity causes formation of SUMO nuclear bodies, which strongly overlap with COP1 bodies thanks to a substrate-binding (VP) motif in the E3 ligase SIZ1 that acts as bridge protein.\n\nAbstractAttachment of the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO to substrate proteins modulates their turnover, activity or interaction partners. An unresolved question is how this SUMO conjugation activity concentrates the enzymes involved and the substrates into uncharacterized nuclear bodies (NBs). We here define the requirements for the formation of SUMO NBs and for their subsequent co-localisation with the master regulator of growth, the E3 ubiquitin ligase COP1. COP1 activity results in degradation of transcription factors, which primes the transcriptional response that underlies elongation growth induced by night-time and high ambient temperatures (skoto- and thermomorphogenesis, respectively). SUMO conjugation activity itself is sufficient to target the SUMO machinery into NBs. Co-localization of these bodies with COP1 requires besides SUMO conjugation activity, a SUMO acceptor site in COP1 and the SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1. We find that SIZ1 docks in the substrate-binding pocket of COP1 via two VP motifs - a known peptide motif of COP1 substrates. The data reveal that SIZ1 physically connects COP1 and SUMO conjugation activity in the same NBs that can also contain the blue-light receptors CRY1 and CRY2. Our findings thus suggest that sumoylation apparently coordinates COP1 activity inside these NBs; a mechanism that potentially explains how SIZ1 and SUMO both control the timing and amplitude of the high-temperature growth response. The strong co-localization of COP1 and SUMO in these NBs might also explain why many COP1 substrates are sumoylated.\n\nFunding informationThe Netherlands Scientific Organisation (ALW-VIDI grant 864.10.004 to HvdB) and the Topsector T&U program Better Plants for Demands (grant 1409-036 to HvdB), including the partnering breeding companies, supported this work; FM is financially supported by Keygene N.V. (The Netherlands).

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mazur, M. J., Kwaaitaal, M., Arroyo Mateos, M., Maio, F., Ramachandra, K. K., Prins, M., van den Burg, H. A.. 2018-08-22. The SUMO conjugation complex self-assembles into nuclear bodies independent of SIZ1 and COP1. https://doi.org/10.1101/393272

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The genetic basis of extra-lobed leaves in ivyleaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederacea)

Intraspecific leaf shape variation is common among angiosperms. Ivyleaf morning glory (Ipomoea hederacea) has become a useful system for studying the genetics and ecology of leaf shape variation as this species exhibits two leaf shapes: leaves with entire margins, and 3-lobed leaves. It is known that these phenotypes are controlled by a single locus, and differ in their ecophysiology, geographic distribution, ecology, and fitness. However, individuals producing leaves with 1-2 extra lobes have also been observed, but the genetic basis of these phenotypes have not been described. To investigate the genetic basis of extra-lobing, we compared phenotypic distributions of leaf shapes of an F2 generation to Mendelian ratios for a single locus trait, and conducted a bulked segregant analysis to uncover quantitative trait loci. Our results suggest that producing extra-lobed leaves has a complex genetic basis and that there are multiple QTLs underlying this phenotype containing potential candidate genes involved with auxin distribution and leaf development. Whether these extra-lobed phenotypes also differ in terms of their physiology and ecology remains unexplored.

plant biology↗

The GSNOR1-VDAC3 complex acts as a cargo co-receptor for mitophagy in response to mitochondrial stress in plants

Mitochondria are central for cellular energy metabolism, and their quality is warranted by multiple mechanisms, including mitophagy, a process of selectively removing damaged, aged, or excess mitochondria. However, the regulatory mechanism of mitophagy remains elusive in plants. Here, we report that Arabidopsis S-nitrosoglutathione reductase 1 (GSNOR1), an enzyme that has long been known to degrade S-nitrosoglutathione, interacts with the outer mitochondrial membrane protein Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel 3 (VDAC3) to mediate mitophagy. GSNOR1 translocates to depolarized mitochondria, binds to VDAC3, and interacts with Autophagy-related 8 (ATG8) via its ATG8-interacting motifs, thereby engulfing damaged mitochondria in autophagosomes for mitophagic degradation. Mutations in GSNOR1 or VDAC3 cause the accumulation of misshapen mitochondria and hypersensitivity to mitochondrial stress. We propose that GSNOR1 acts as a cargo receptor interacting with VDAC3 and ATG8 to target depolarized mitochondria to mitophagy, thereby regulating cellular homeostasis.

plant biology↗

Ontogenetic and time-course transcriptomic analyses of maize leaf primordia reveal regulators of transverse vein development

Leaf vein patterning varies greatly among land plants and is linked to leaf structure and function. C4 plants, such as maize, have a denser arrangement of veins than C3 plants, which is hypothesized to be a pre-adaptive trait for C4 photosynthesis. Therefore, understanding how leaf veins are patterned has implications for maximizing photosynthetic efficiency. Major maize leaf veins, called longitudinal veins, are arranged in parallel and are interconnected by transverse veins. Recent work has established molecular factors controlling longitudinal vein development; however, it is unknown how transverse veins are patterned. Here, we investigated how transverse veins establish connections within the maize vascular network. We performed anatomical analyses of transverse veins and found that despite asynchronous development, transverse veins fully integrate into the longitudinal vein network. Tracing the ontogeny of transverse vein development using the marker PIN1a-YFP, we found that two sets of two initial cells on opposing sides of adjacent longitudinal veins recruit intervening ground cells to form the provascular strand. Treatment with auxin inhibitors did not abolish transverse vein initiation, suggesting an auxin-independent pre-pattern for transverse vein initiation. Through time-course RNAseq of leaf primordia, we identified a transcriptional signature that precedes transverse vein development. Two genes that belong to this gene cluster, EREB41 and EREB114, are necessary for transverse vein formation. Together, our studies establish the ontogeny of maize transverse vein development and reveal how new vascular connections are specified, assembled, and integrated into an existing vascular network.

plant biology↗