bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/391730

DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint

Abstract

Bacteria coordinate DNA replication and cell division, ensuring that a complete set of genetic material is passed onto the next generation. When bacteria encounter DNA damage or impediments to DNA replication, a cell cycle checkpoint is activated to delay cell division by expressing a cell division inhibitor. The prevailing model for bacterial DNA damage checkpoints is that activation of the DNA damage response and protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor is sufficient to regulate the checkpoint process. Our recent genome-wide screens identified the gene ddcA as critical for surviving exposure to a broad spectrum of DNA damage. The ddcA deletion phenotypes are dependent on the checkpoint enforcement protein YneA. We found that expression of the checkpoint recovery proteases could not compensate for ddcA deletion. Similarly, expression if ddcA could not compensate for the absence of the checkpoint recovery proteases, indicating that DdcA function is distinct from the checkpoint recovery step. Deletion of ddcA resulted in sensitivity to yneA overexpression independent of YneA protein levels or stability, further supporting the conclusion that DdcA regulates YneA through a proteolysis independent mechanism. Using a functional GFP-YneA we found that DdcA inhibits YneA activity independent of YneA localization, suggesting that DdcA may regulate YneA access to its target. These results uncover a regulatory step that is important for controlling the DNA damage checkpoint in bacteria, and suggests that the typical mechanism of degrading the checkpoint enforcement protein is insufficient to control the rate of cell division in response to DNA damage.\n\nAuthor SummaryAll cells coordinate DNA replication and cell division. When cells encounter DNA damage, the process of DNA replication is slowed and the cell must also delay cell division. In bacteria, the process has long been thought to occur using two principle modes of regulation. The first, is RecA coated ssDNA transmits the signal of DNA damage through inactivation of the repressor of the DNA damage (SOS) response regulon, which results in expression of a cell division inhibitor establishing the checkpoint. The second principle step is protease mediated degradation of the cell division inhibitor relieving the checkpoint. Recent work by our lab and others has suggested that this process may be more complex than originally thought. Here, we investigated a gene of unknown function that we previously identified as important for survival when the bacterium Bacillus subtilis is exposed to DNA damage. We found that this gene negatively regulates the cell division inhibitor, but is functionally distinct from the checkpoint recovery process. We provide evidence that this gene functions as an antagonist to establishing the DNA damage checkpoint. Our study uncovers a novel layer of regulation in the bacterial DNA damage checkpoint process challenging the longstanding models established in the bacterial DNA damage response field.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Burby, P. E., Simmons, Z. W., Simmons, L. A.. 2018-08-14. DdcA antagonizes a bacterial DNA damage checkpoint. https://doi.org/10.1101/391730

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Genomic analysis of the Streptococcus anginosus group; taxonomic implications, evolutionary insights and clinical considerations

Background: The Streptococcus anginosus group (SAG) (S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus) causes serious, potentially life-threatening, invasive infections, often in otherwise healthy individuals. However, the group's diversity is still poorly understood, and with it, the ability to identify prognostic markers of severe disease. Methods: Long-read sequencing produced closed genomes for 29 isolates from 25 patients hospitalised primarily for invasive SAG infections, and 21 isolates from 20 non-hospitalised controls. Genomes were classified with GTDB-Tk and combined with 211 reference genomes. After dereplication, 207 SAG genomes (38 isolate, 169 reference) representing 206 strains were analysed using: GTDB classification, average nucleotide identity, multi-marker and core-genome SNP phylogenies, recombination-aware analyses, mobilome, CAZyme and gapseq metabolic profiling, and lineage-aware genome-wide association testing for invasive phenotype. Results: Agreement between GTDB-Tk and MALDI-TOF taxonomic classifications was low (42.8%), including two S. massiliensis cases mis-identified by MALDI-TOF as SAG. S. anginosus resolved into four taxa (S. anginosus, S. hominis, S. whileyi and S. vaginalis). Phylogenies based on core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms resolved these species into distinct clades, whereas 16S rRNA gene and multilocus sequence analysis phylogenies did not. The four ex-S. anginosus taxa showed a gradient of genomic cohesion, with S. vaginalis being near-clonal, in contrast to S. anginosus, which shared high levels of sequence ancestry with other neighbouring taxa. Carbohydrate utilisation was strongly lineage-associated, as was propensity for invasive disease. A ~15Kbp glycosaminoglycan utilisation locus was found in the three taxa of highest disease severity propensity (S. intermedius, S. constellatus, S. whileyi) which predicts a direct host glycosaminoglycan feeding mechanism that may contribute to invasive disease. No single functional feature, gene or core-genome SNP was associated with invasiveness however after lineage-adjustment. Combined feature analysis suggests S. vaginalis has undergone a niche restriction and has evolved for a primary existence in the female urogenital tract. Conclusions: Under-reported species may be mis-diagnosed as SAG invasive infections. SAG is more diverse than its current three-species definition, with the conventional S. anginosus species proposed to be classed into a complex of four distinct taxa. Invasive capacity appears to be an emergent system-level property rather than from individual features.

microbiology↗

Cell-scale confinement reorders bacterial speed rankings

Which bacterium swims fastest depends on where the race is run. Speeds are usually measured in open liquid, yet many bacteria live in pores, mucus and host passages no wider than a cell. Using a microfluidic device with eight channel widths (0.80-3.00 m) in one field of view, we tracked unlabeled cells of eight species spanning five motility systems. Chamber height, a polymer additive and channel width each reordered the ranking. Vibrio alginolyticus, the fastest in open liquid, slowed to ~4 m/s in 1.25-m channels, whereas Campylobacter jejuni and Bacillus subtilis kept 33-46 m/s. Open liquid speed did not predict robustness to confinement. In two unrelated lineages, host symbionts that pass through narrow passages during colonization, Caballeronia insecticola and Vibrio fischeri, outran their non-symbiotic relatives in the channels, and crossed them with flagella wrapped around the cell body at nearly the speed of unwrapped cells. Where space is tight, the ability to keep moving, not top speed, sets the ranking.

microbiology↗

The biochemical composition of coronavirus Nucleocapsid proteins drives the bicistronic properties of their sub-genomic mRNAs

The nucleocapsid (N) gene of coronaviruses (CoVs) encodes a structural RNA-binding protein required for viral assembly. In SARS- and MERS-CoV viruses, reading frame 2 of N contains an overlapping open reading frame (ORF) encoding an innate immune antagonist accessory protein. However, the extent of this dual coding capacity across the CoV family, and the genetic features driving overlapping ORF formation, remain unexamined. Here, we developed an in-silico tool (ORFan) to screen structural gene sub-genomic mRNA sequences from 152 species of coronavirus for the presence of overlapping accessory gene candidates. We found that frame 2 of the N gene in Alpha-, Beta- and Delta-CoVs frequently contains a potential accessory ORF (AcORF), conserved at the subgenus level, unlike the spike, envelope and membrane genes. We also show that CoV nucleotide biases in conjunction with codon biases integral to N protein function drive the relatively high abundances of start codons in frame two and stop codons in frame three, explaining the tendency towards frame 2 AcORFs. We further suggest that viral nucleotide biases and the codon composition required for RNA-binding function facilitate overlapping ORF formation in other virus families

microbiology↗