bioRxiv · 10.1101/383547
A scoping review of health-based survey instruments validated in Brunei Darussalam
Abstract
This study sought to map and review validated health-based survey instruments in Brunei Darussalam. A scoping search of relevant articles was carried out. Six health-based survey tools have been psychometrically evaluated in Brunei Darussalam, 4 in Brunei-Malay (SF-36v2, EQ-5D/VAS, CPQ{pi}_14, and m-SEQ-12) and 2 in English (OFER and WPBA) languages. Two studies (m-SEQ-12, CPQ11-14) translated tools in English into Brunei-Malay. Two studies (SF-36v2, EQ-5D) cross-culturally adapted the Malaysian and Singaporean versions of the tools into Brunei-Malay. Four studies were adult- and hospital-based, among healthcare workers (OFER,WPBA) and patients with chronic diseases (SF-36v2, EQ-5D); and 2 studies (m-SEQ-12, CPQ11-14) were non-adult-and secondary school-based. Pretesting was carried out in 4 studies (SF-36v2, EQ-5D, CPQ11-14, and m-SEQ-12) on a sample of 5 to 20 volunteers. The sample size for validation ranged from 40 to 457. Reliability tests, Cronbachs alpha and intra-class coefficient (n=3), Cohens Kappa (n=1), and 5-point scale qualitative assessment (n=1) were measured. Validity tests included face validity (n=2), discriminant validity (n=2), convergent validity (n=2), construct validity (n=2), factorial validity (n=2), and 5-point scale qualitative assessment (n=1). There is a need for more psychometric evaluation of questionnaires in Brunei Darussalam. Importantly, large heterogeneous participants, more languages, and varied psychometric tests should be considered.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Alhaji, M. M., Tan, J., Naing, L., Tuah, N. A.. 2018-08-02. A scoping review of health-based survey instruments validated in Brunei Darussalam. https://doi.org/10.1101/383547
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.