bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/336909

Selecting precise reference normal tissue samples for cancer research using a deep learning approach

Abstract

BackgroundNormal tissue samples are often employed as a control for understanding disease mechanisms, however, collecting matched normal tissues from patients is difficult in many instances. In cancer research, for example, the open cancer resources such as TCGA and TARGET do not provide matched tissue samples for every cancer or cancer subtype. The recent GTEx project has profiled samples from healthy individuals, providing an excellent resource for this field, yet the feasibility of using GTEx samples as the reference remains unanswered.\n\nMethodsWe analyze RNA-Seq data processed from the same computational pipeline and systematically evaluate GTEx as a potential reference resource. We use those cancers that have adjacent normal tissues in TCGA as a benchmark for the evaluation. To correlate tumor samples and normal samples, we explore top varying genes, reduced features from principal component analysis, and encoded features from an autoencoder neural network. We first evaluate whether these methods can identify the correct tissue of origin from GTEx for a given cancer and then seek to answer whether disease expression signatures are consistent between those derived from TCGA and from GTEx.\n\nResultsAmong 32 TCGA cancers, 18 cancers have less than 10 matched adjacent normal tissue samples. Among three methods, autoencoder performed the best in predicting tissue of origin, with 12 of 14 cancers correctly predicted. The reason for misclassification of two cancers is that none of normal samples from GTEx correlate well with any tumor samples in these cancers. This suggests that GTEx has matched tissues for the majority cancers, but not all. While using autoencoder to select proper normal samples for disease signature creation, we found that disease signatures derived from normal samples selected via an autoencoder from GTEx are consistent with those derived from adjacent samples from TCGA in many cases. Interestingly, choosing top 50 mostly correlated samples regardless of tissue type performed reasonably well or even better in some cancers.\n\nConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that samples from GTEx can serve as reference normal samples for cancers, especially those do not have available adjacent tissue samples. A deep-learning based approach holds promise to select proper normal samples.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zeng, W., Glicksberg, B., Li, Y., Chen, B.. 2018-06-02. Selecting precise reference normal tissue samples for cancer research using a deep learning approach. https://doi.org/10.1101/336909

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

scRM: A single-cell foundation model trained on scRNA-seq reads

To our knowledge, scRM is the first single-cell foundation model trained on sequencing reads, demonstrating that raw data pretraining is not only feasible but competitive at a fraction of the computational cost. We anticipate that scaling this framework and exploring alternative architectures will unlock biological information inaccessible to count models and extend the dataset-specific pretraining it already makes possible. The source code is available at https://github.com/altos-labs/scRM.

bioinformatics↗

Local fractal dimension as an indicator of functional reorganization in molecular interaction networks

Changes in protein abundance incompletely describe how molecular perturbations reshape cellular organization. Here we introduce DIFFRACT, a framework that integrates quantitative proteomics with protein-protein interaction networks to identify reorganization through changes in local fractal dimension. Molecular associations define effective distances between connected proteins, allowing the geometry of their surrounding network neighborhoods to be compared across conditions. Analyses across four organisms (E. coli, A. thaliana, C. elegans, and H. sapiens) and three interaction resources (STRING, BioGRID, and IntAct) establish heterogeneous local scaling, while controlled perturbations demonstrate sensitivity to regional changes and invariance to uniform distance rescaling. Applied to RAVER1-deficient A549 cells, DIFFRACT identifies components associated with established RNA-regulatory functions and candidate roles in tRNA biology, mitochondrial organization and ciliogenesis. Selected RNA-regulatory and ciliary themes are not significantly enriched by abundance-ranked gene set analysis, supporting complementary information from network geometry. Selected functional annotations also recur in HEK293T cells. Guided by the ciliary predictions, we show that RAVER1 depletion increases the proportion of ciliated A549 cells 2.57-fold and increases cilium length. DIFFRACT thus connects changes in molecular network geometry to experimentally testable biological responses, extending the interpretation of proteomic perturbations beyond differential abundance.

bioinformatics↗

Peripheral Exercise Transcriptomes Do Not Converge on Glutamatergic or Neuroinflammatory Signatures: A Cross-Platform Meta-Analysis

Executive dysfunction following physical overtraining has been linked to glutamatergic dysregulation in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), but whether this central mechanism is reflected in peripheral gene expression is unknown. This study tested whether peripheral transcriptomic responses to exercise converge on the glutamatergic or neuroinflammatory pathways implicated in LPFC dysfunction. Three publicly available GEO datasets spanning skeletal muscle, whole blood, and circulating neutrophils were analyzed across four exercise groups using limma, with a discovery threshold of nominal p < 0.05 and absolute log2 fold change above 0.5. Differential expression analysis identified 7,311 unique differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the four contrasts, but overlap between datasets was limited: 7 genes were shared between skeletal muscle and blood, 38 between skeletal muscle and the GSE43856 contrasts, and 90 between blood and the GSE43856 contrasts, with none significant across all three studies. Gene Ontology and KEGG enrichment of the DEG union identified ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, ribosome biogenesis, protein folding, and T cell activation as the dominant biological processes; no glutamatergic or neuroinflammatory terms reached significance. Cross-tissue concordance between skeletal muscle and blood was absent (r = 0). Effect sizes among the genes driving the top enriched pathways were dominated by ribosomal proteins, heat shock proteins, and translation initiation factors rather than glutamate receptors or transporters. These findings indicate that peripheral transcriptomic responses to exercise are tissue-specific and dominated by proteostasis, translational, and immune programs rather than glutamatergic signaling. Direct assessment of central nervous system tissue or fluid-based glutamatergic biomarkers may be required to link overtraining-induced fatigue to LPFC dysfunction.

bioinformatics↗