bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/270702

First data-driven approach to using individual cattle weights to estimate mean adult dairy cattle weight in the UK

Schubert, H. E.·Wood, S.·Reyher, K.·Mills, H.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

IntroductionKnowledge of accurate weights of cattle is crucial for effective dosing of individual animals with medicine and for reporting antimicrobial usage metrics, amongst other uses. The most common weight for dairy cattle presented in current literature is 600 kg, but this is not evidenced by data. For the first time, we provide an evidence-based estimate of the average weight of UK dairy cattle to better inform decisions by farmers, veterinarians and the scientific community.\n\nMethodsWe collected data for 2,747 dairy cattle from 20 farms in the UK, 19 using Lely Automatic Milking Systems with weigh floors and 1 using a crush with weigh scales. These data covered farms with different breed types, including Holstein, Friesian, Holstein-Friesian and Jersey, as well as farms with dual purpose breeds and cross-breeds. Data were used to calculate a mean weight for dairy cattle by breed, and a UK-specific mean weight was generated by scaling to UK-specific breed proportions. Trends in weight by lactation number, DIM and production level were also explored using individual cattle-level data.\n\nResultsMean weight for adult dairy cattle included in this study was 617 kg (standard deviation (sd) 85.6 kg). Mean weight varied across breeds, with a range of 466 kg (sd=56.0 kg, Jersey) to 636 kg (sd=84.1, Holsteins). When scaled to UK breed proportions, the estimated mean UK dairy cattle weight was 620 kg. Overall, first-lactation heifers weighed 9% less than cows. Mean weight declined for the first 30 days post-calving, before steadily increasing. For cattle at peak production, mean weight increased with production level.\n\nConclusionsThis study is the first to calculate a mean weight of adult dairy cattle in the UK based on on-farm data. Overall mean weight was higher than that most often proposed in the literature (600 kg). Evidence-informed weights are crucial as the UK works to better monitor and report metrics to monitor antimicrobial use and are useful to farmers and veterinarians to inform dosing decisions.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognitionPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Schubert, H. E., Wood, S., Reyher, K., Mills, H.. 2018-02-23. First data-driven approach to using individual cattle weights to estimate mean adult dairy cattle weight in the UK. https://doi.org/10.1101/270702

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

The Effects of Environmental Enrichment on the Behavior of Laboratory Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Enclosures for laboratory animals are often simple for economic and practical reasons. Enrichment items, such as plants, toys, and refuges, have been shown to improve measures of welfare in commonly used species such as mice and dogs. The numbers of laboratory zebrafish have been increasing in recent years, and most are housed in systems devoid of enrichment. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of environmental enrichment on adult laboratory zebrafish behavior. Experimental fish were raised in the presence of three different enrichment regimes: plastic plants, toys, and photos of gravel. These were compared to a control group raised under standard housing conditions. Once the fish reached sexual maturity, we measured aggression, reproduction, and growth. We found that each enrichment treatment led to significant reductions in aggression in a mirror test compared to control. Reproduction was largely unaffected by the three enrichment treatments. However, we found egg production was decreased following the gravel treatment, and egg survival was increased following the plant treatment. There were no significant impacts of enrichment on measures of growth. In a parallel experiment, breeding fish were exposed to plastic plant enrichment during overnight breeding. Surprisingly, there was no significant impact on egg production or egg survival.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Development of the Highly Sensitive Horse questionnaire to assess horses' sensory processing sensitivity

It is well established that individuals vary in how they respond to situations, but might they also perceive their environment differently? Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) is a multidimensional trait describing individual variation in the perception and response to sensory, emotional, and social stimuli. While extensively studied in humans, its presence in animals remains underexplored. We investigated whether horses might exhibit a comparable trait and developed the Highly Sensitive Horse questionnaire to assess equine SPS. A 104-item questionnaire was developed and refined using data from an online survey of 121 horses. The remaining 45 items were evaluated in an independent survey of 561 horses. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identified a robust two-factor, 12-item structure reflecting dimensions similar to the human SPS dimensions of: Overstimulation, describing a tendency to become overwhelmed by intense or prolonged stimuli, and Sensitivity to subtleties, describing heightened perception of subtle environmental changes. The scale showed high internal consistency, excellent intra-rater and moderate inter-rater reliability. Although eSPS was associated with established behavioural traits, including fearfulness, it also explained unique behavioural variation beyond these traits. These findings suggest that horses differ in how they perceive their environment, providing a foundation to better understand equine behaviour, and opening new avenues for comparative sensory-processing research.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Social foragers rely more on dynamic cues than prior beliefs in unpredictable natural environments

Foraging is a prime example of adaptive decision-making in uncertain and changing environments. Foragers need to continuously integrate their direct experiences and observations of what others are doing with what they already know about the distribution of prey. Yet little is known about the importance of prior knowledge relative to dynamically sampled information in social foraging settings. Here, we investigated the role of prior beliefs in five large-scale ice-fishing competitions involving 49--53 highly experienced ice-fishers in 251 foraging trips. To quantify their prior spatial beliefs, participants marked areas they believed to have high resource abundance on topographic maps containing isoclines (i.e., depth curves) before each competition. GPS devices and headcams tracked behavioural states and foraging success. We found that prior beliefs about the fish distribution are to a large extent driven by lake topography and therefore converge across individuals. However, these prior beliefs were not systematically linked to foraging success. While prior beliefs predicted spot choices, especially in the beginning of competitions, they were heavily outweighed by dynamic personal and social information sources. Exploring how the use of prior beliefs differed between foraging trips, we found that high reliance on prior beliefs was associated with reduced avoidance of unsuccessful locations which resulted in limited spatial exploration. We conclude that dynamic information sampling and accumulation are key processes in social foraging decisions, with prior spatial beliefs playing only a minor role in natural environments where resources are hard to predict in advance.

animal behavior and cognition↗