bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.03.685948

StrainOptimizer empowers rational cell factory design through multi-scale metabolic models with expression and proteome constraints

Abstract

The rational design of microbial cell factories for high bioproduction remains a key challenge in metabolic engineering. While advanced modelling frameworks incorporating protein resource allocation, such as enzyme-constrained models (ecGEMs) and Expression and Thermodynamic Flux (ETFL), provide superior predictive power, their application is limited by a lack of user-friendly computational tools. Here, we present strainOptimizer, a comprehensive computational platform for rational strain design that systematically evaluates key resource allocation principles: the coupling of gene expression with metabolism, subcellular compartmentalization, and enzyme capacity limitations. Our benchmark analyses demonstrate that each principle offers distinct advantages: models coupling metabolism and expression (like ETFL) enable the identification of non-metabolic targets, organelle-level proteomic constraints improve precision for high-protein-cost products, and protein-usage-based objectives consistently outperformed traditional flux-based approaches. To demonstrate its practical utility, we applied strainOptimizer to an engineered sclareol-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. The platform identified novel targets, and experimental validation confirmed a 67% success rate, increasing the final sclareol titer by 14-26% and productivity by up to 45%. StrainOptimizer bridges the gap between resource allocation theory and applied engineering, providing a powerful, validated tool to accelerate the development of high-performance cell factories.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wang, H., Zhang, M., Zhang, C., He, S., Liao, W., Zhu, R., Zhou, Y., Lu, H.. 2025-11-04. StrainOptimizer empowers rational cell factory design through multi-scale metabolic models with expression and proteome constraints. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.03.685948

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

SpiraMed: A Stereotactic Helix-based Therapy Delivery system for the Human Brain

Stereotactic needle-based delivery remains the standard for local administration of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) to the human brain. ATMP administration typically involves multiple trajectories, presenting cumulative risks and prolonging surgery. Reflux-prone, patchy therapy coverage compromises clinical results. We demonstrate a novel approach, deploying a helical delivery catheter via a single access trajectory per target, referred to as SpiraMed. Helix retraction is synchronised with therapy delivery, enabling comprehensive target coverage in seconds. Helix pitch and diameter can be precisely tailored to patient-specific target volume and vascular anatomy, as part of the preoperative stereotactic surgical planning process. Testing in agarose phantoms, live sheep and cadaveric human brain confirms enhanced therapy delivery volume, delivery speed and target coverage, with reductions in reflux and predicted risk of bleeding complication. SpiraMed represents a new paradigm, promising to help deliver on the transformative potential of cell and gene therapies across the spectrum of human CNS disease.

bioengineering↗

AtomWeaver: Multi-Component Flow Matching with a Structured Geometric Prior Facilitates Non-Canonical Peptide Design

Fixed-backbone sequence discovery, or inverse folding, is a critical recurring task in the development of new polypeptide therapeutics. Once promising backbones are established for a target pocket, computational inverse folding methods greatly help accelerate generation of candidate sequences. Such methods are mature for the traditional case of limiting to the fixed twenty-letter canonical vocabulary; however, they cannot access the broader space of non-canonical amino acids (NCAAs). This design constraint is exacerbated for peptide binders, a fast-growing modality that readily incorporates NCAAs, though in practice non-canonical design frequently depends on laborious medicinal-chemistry campaigns. An extension of inverse folding to NCAAs is thus critical to accelerating design of novel therapeutic peptides. AtomWeaver uses a joint all-site, atom-level generative scheme that does not restrict side-chain categorical assignment by either predetermined or co-resolving residue identity. Conditioned only on a fixed peptide backbone and its target protein, its multi-component flow guides side-chain atoms as unlabeled points in R3 from a nested shell prior to a variable-count final atom cloud. Identity is then read by matching each predicted cloud against a reference library of canonical and non-canonical templates. Since identity is decided only at decode time, the addressable vocabulary is a property of the library rather than of the trained weights: a new NCAA costs one reference structure and no retraining, and the model can select residues it was never prompted for and never saw in training. On a deep mutational scan of two peptide-target systems, AtomWeaver's canonical readout shows high observed mean agreement with experimental values among the compared inverse-folding methods. In the mixed canonical-noncanonical setting that canonical-only baselines cannot support at all, it likewise retains ranking signal across both systems. AtomWeaver also displayed self-consistent designs on de novo binder backbones, with the highest interface confidence among compared methods. Notably, it reached these metrics while achieving broad empirical coverage of our 300-residue vocabulary, including four non-canonical types never visible in training. AtomWeaver thus serves canonical and non-canonical peptide design alike, while transforming residue vocabulary to an expandable inference-time choice.

bioengineering↗

The Influence of Obesity and Body Shape on Sagittal Plane Knee Kinematics and Kinetics during Obstacle Crossing

Altered walking mechanics in individuals with obesity can contribute to knee osteoarthritis. The gait deviations may become more pronounced during obstacle crossing. In women, body fat distribution may further influence knee load, especially when excess fat accumulates in the thighs and hips. However, relatively little is known about how regional fat distribution affects gait in women with obesity. This study investigated how obesity and, among women, different fat distributions (Apple: more abdominal fat; Pear: more lower-limb fat) influence knee biomechanics during walking with and without obstacle crossing. Participants were 15 controls without obesity (NB) and 27 with obesity (OB). Within female participants, 10 without obesity (fNB) were compared with 20 with obesity, stratified by waist-hip ratio (Apple:10, Pear:10). Speed-adjusted statistical parametric mapping applied a general linear model (NB vs. OB) and an analysis of covariance (fNB vs. Apple vs. Pear). OB exhibited a significantly greater late-stance knee extension moment than NB across all tasks, and this difference persisted among fNB, Apple, and Pear in obstacle tasks (p<0.05). OB walked with reduced knee flexion during the early-stance leading limb after crossing a medium-height obstacle (p=0.048) and a high-height obstacle (p=0.008) compared to NB. There were significant body-shape effects (p<0.05), and post-hoc comparisons confirmed that Pear had lower knee angles than fNB in both leading-limb conditions after crossing medium- and high-height obstacles (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). These findings suggest that obstacle crossing helps illuminate how excess weight influences knee biomechanics, and how regional fat distribution modulates the degree of this alteration.

bioengineering↗