bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.10.14.682345

Investigating the potential for mirror self-recognition in honeybees (Apis mellifera): a preliminary study using the mark test

Abstract

Mirror self-recognition (MSR) is a key indicator of self-awareness, primarily studied in vertebrates. Investigating MSR in invertebrates such as the western honeybee (Apis mellifera), an insect with advanced cognition, is essential to understanding the evolutionary origins and potential convergent evolution of self-recognition. We conducted two experiments using a classic mark test, applying a paint mark to the clypeus, a body part invisible to the bee without a mirror, and compared head-directed grooming between bees with and without mirror access. In Experiment 1 (n=12), without prior mirror exposure, bees did not increase their total grooming activity, although they did groom for a significantly higher proportion of time while facing the mirror. In Experiment 2 (n=9), bees with prior mirror exposure showed significantly higher total grooming activity than controls, an effect driven by an increase in grooming while facing the mirror. However, the critical test for MSR, a direct comparison of grooming while facing the mirror versus facing away from it, was not significant in either experiments mirror group. Our findings suggest the observed behaviors are not indicative of MSR. Instead, they are better explained by simpler mechanisms, such as an orienting response to a novel stimulus (Exp 1), generalized agitation from a perceived social stimulus (Exp 2), or tactile irritation from the mark itself, an interpretation consistent with findings in other invertebrates. This exploratory research, limited by small sample sizes, provides preliminary yet inconclusive evidence. We discuss our results in the context of key methodological prerequisites for the mark test, such as mark salience, and the broader possibility that MSR-like behaviors reflect a learned perceptual-motor skill rather than an abstract self-concept. Thus, this study contributes not by providing a definitive answer, but by highlighting these critical challenges and establishing a rigorous framework for future investigations designed to disentangle these alternative hypotheses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shishimi, G., Akaishi, R., Matsukami, M.. 2025-10-15. Investigating the potential for mirror self-recognition in honeybees (Apis mellifera): a preliminary study using the mark test. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.14.682345

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

roostR: An R package to examine diel activity patterns from Motus radio telemetry data

1. Monitoring the diel activity patterns of free-living animals is a methodological challenge. Signal strength fluctuations from Very High Frequency (VHF) radio transmitters deployed within the Motus Wildlife Tracking System can be used as a proxy for activity. However, analytical tools to extract behavioral metrics that quantify activity patterns from these data are needed. 2. We developed roostR, an open-source R package that converts Motus detection data into quantitative behavioral metrics, including roost initiation and departure, roost duration, observation time, and restlessness. The package uses a sequential pipeline built around signal volatility and rolling medians to detect transitions between active and inactive states. Default parameter values were tuned using data from 55 dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) overwintering in southeastern Ohio. 3. We provide an example from a dark-eyed junco over a 58-day period. roostR estimated roost onset on 48 nights and departure on 56 mornings, with higher rolling median signal differences during the day than at night, consistent with a diurnal animal, and variable restlessness periods each night. We also used the package to estimate roost behavior of an American tree sparrow (Spizelloides arborea) over 43-nights. 4. roostR enables researchers to extract individual activity data from Motus datasets. Because all thresholds are user-adjustable, the pipeline is adaptable across species, tag specifications, and ecological contexts, enabling researchers to test hypotheses about how environmental factors influence diel activity patterns.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Characterizing rhythmic wheel-turning behavioral patterns in cockroaches Rhyparobia maderae using machine learning

Organisms must adapt to environmental changes occurring across multiple time scales, with endogenous multiscale clocks coordinating physiology and behavior with recurring environmental rhythms, including the dominant 24-hour cycle and faster ultradian rhythms. The Madeira cockroach (Rhyparobia maderae) provides a suitable model for investigating such multiscale temporal organization. Here, locomotor activity was recorded in running-wheel experiments under constant darkness. While the endogenous circadian clock produces a clearly visible 24-hour rhythm, it remains unknown whether locomotor behavior also exhibits temporal patterns at additional time scales. These temporal patterns cannot be found by classical frequency analysis, as they are veiled by higher harmonics of the circadian rhythm which are in the same frequency range. Unsupervised machine learning methods such as K-Means clustering, self-organizing maps and Gaussian mixture are used in search for fast ultradian rhythms possibly linked to circadian cycles in locomotor activity. Prior to applying these methods, data metrics are defined which characterize bouts of activity (called activity impulses) compared to periods of reduced activity. A stochastic pattern was found in these activity metrics which characterizes the time distance between activity impulses. Across all approaches, a consistent ultradian rhythm of approximately one hour was identified in the timing of the activity maxima. This rhythm was mainly detected during the subjective night, suggesting circadian control, and appears to consist of two components with periods of approximately 40 minutes and 1.5 hours. The method proposed in this paper is applied to two cockroach groups with different levels of activity, and is generalizable to diverse datasets occurring in the form of a time series with a dominant rhythm.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Social inequity aversion and fairness preference in polar bears

Decision-making is key to survival, with choices and behaviour typically shaped by evolutionary pressures to enhance fitness and minimize loss. Inequity aversion, the tendency to respond negatively to unequal reward distributions, is therefore unexpected, as acts of fairness may be costly to the individual in the short term. In social, cooperative species, however, fairness may enhance long-term benefits through stable social interactions. Inequity aversion is believed to promote cooperative social structures and has only been demonstrated in certain social species. Yet, solitary species have not been tested, and whether this behaviour depends on social cooperative structures is unknown. Examining solitary species could clarify whether inequity aversion reflects an adaptation to cooperation or a general cognitive capacity linked to social comparison and reward evaluation. We studied inequity aversion in polar bears (Ursus maritimus), a largely solitary species, using three complementary, non-invasive cognition tests on seven bears from two zoos in the Netherlands. (1) An impunity experiment assessing effort-based inequity, in which bears performed a standardized action to obtain food rewards. (2) A choice-based experiment testing active selection between equal and unequal reward distributions. (3) A no-task control experiment assessing responses to unequal reward distribution without effort. Under effort-based inequity, bears reduced task performance and increased task latency when a partner received a superior reward. Unequal reward distributions did not affect reward acceptance independent of effort. In the choice-based paradigm, bears preferentially selected equal reward distributions with a partner present. Although generalizability to wild populations is limited, these findings demonstrate behavioural aversion of social inequity in a non-cooperative species. Inequality aversion may therefore not be restricted to social, cooperative animals but instead reflect a broadly distributed cognitive mechanism that emerges under relevant social conditions. These findings challenge current theories and advance our understanding of the cognitive foundations of fairness-related behaviour in animals.

animal behavior and cognition↗