bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.10.13.682067

MIC*: A Framework for Interpretable Analysis of Ordinal Viability Data

Abstract

Microbial survival assays frequently use ordered categorical (ordinal) scores, such as semi-quantitative viability scores across drug concentrations. While these ordinal data provide rich information about dose-response dynamics, they require appropriate statistical approaches for proper analysis. Proportional-odds (PO) ordinal regression is specifically designed for such data, modeling the ordered nature of scores while accommodating continuous variables such as concentration. However, despite its advantages, PO regression remains underutilized in microbiology because its cumulative log-odds outputs are abstract and biologically unintuitive. Consequently, researchers often resort to flawed alternatives: collapsing scores into binary outcomes (growth/no growth), treating scores as continuous values for t-tests or ANOVA, or applying nonparametric tests that ignore dose-response structure. Each approach sacrifices power or validity, risking unreliable conclusions. To allow researchers to better leverage the power of ordinal datasets, we introduce MIC*, a summary measure that translates PO regression results into biologically interpretable units. MIC* is defined as the treatment concentration where the predicted probability of "no viability" equals 0.5, and is thus conceptually related to the minimum inhibitory dose (MIC) widely used in antimicrobial research. MIC* retains the rigor of ordinal regression while providing more biologically intuitive effect size measures. The MIC* framework enables formal comparisons as absolute differences ({Delta}MIC*) or relative fold-changes ({Delta}log2MIC*), allowing for robust statistical comparisons between samples. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that MIC* yields robust estimates with superior power compared to conventional statistical methods, while case studies demonstrate practical utility. To ensure wide adoption, we provide a suite of open-source tools: a BLInded Scoring System (BLISS) for generating ordinal viability scores, and web-based (MICalculator) and R package (ordinalMIC) alternatives for performing complete MIC* analyses, thus reducing barriers to appropriate analysis of ordinal phenotypes in microbiology. ImportanceMicrobiologists routinely use visual scoring systems to assess cell viability for antimicrobial and stress resistance studies. However, current analysis approaches tend to be problematic, with researchers seeking simple approaches that either discard valuable information or violate important statistical assumptions. While rigorous and appropriate statistical approaches exist, they are rarely used in microbiology because they produce outputs that are non-intuitive and require specialized expertise to implement. Our MIC* framework overcomes these longstanding barriers by translating abstract outputs into an intuitive, concentration-based metric akin to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) well Known to microbiologists. MIC* allows for biologically interpretable comparisons on both absolute ({Delta}MIC*) and relative ({Delta}log2MIC*) scales, allowing for facile between-sample comparisons. MIC* outperforms conventional statistical approaches, and we offer user-friendly software tools to enable broad adoption by the community.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stacy, C. L., Lenaduwe, S., Stuecker, T. N., Lewis, J. A.. 2025-10-13. MIC*: A Framework for Interpretable Analysis of Ordinal Viability Data. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.13.682067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Combined with Lateral Flow Assay (RT-LAMP-LFA) for Rapid Detection of the 2026 Bundibugyo Virus (BDBV) Outbreak Strain

Making accurate diagnosis is a critical first step in patient management and control for emerging and re-emerging disease outbreaks. Bundibugyo virus (BDBV) is a filovirus that causes Ebola disease, and the 2026 outbreak highlights the need for rapid diagnostic approaches that can be deployed in settings with limited laboratory infrastructure. Here, we developed a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification-lateral flow assay (RT-LAMP-LFA) for rapid detection of the 2026 BDBV outbreak strain. LAMP primers were designed based on the genome sequence of the 2026 outbreak strain, and the conservation of the primer binding sites among all available 2026 outbreak genomes was confirmed in silico. LAMP primers were evaluated for analytical specificity and sensitivity using in vitro-transcribed RNA (ivtRNA) from BDBV and other filoviruses, as well as RNA derived from arboviruses and mammalian cells. Amplification products were detected using a Chromatography-Printed Array Strip (C-PAS) lateral flow platform. The newly designed primers specifically detected the presence of BDBV RNA without nonspecific amplification of the other viral or cellular RNA samples tested. Consistent amplification was observed down to 103 copies per reaction. In addition, BDBV viral RNA was successfully amplified, and the amplification products were detected using C-PAS, with the total workflow being completed within 25 min. These findings demonstrate the analytical specificity and sensitivity of the developed RT-LAMP-LFA assay and its compatibility with rapid visual lateral flow detection, supporting its potential application as a point-of-care approach for BDBV detection.

microbiology↗

Divergent methane production and microbial community responses to carbon enrichment in freshwater wetland sediments

Methane (CH4) accumulation in wetland sediments reflects interactions among organic matter, sediment chemistry, and microbial communities. We combined depth-resolved field characterization across four wetland habitats in northern Israel with complementary incubations to examine methane accumulation and responses to labile-carbon enrichment. Sediment cores were characterized using Rock-Eval analysis, porewater chemistry, oxygen profiling at three sites, and mcrA amplicon sequencing. High CH4 concentrations occurred under contrasting conditions: Ein Nimfit (EN) contained approximately 12% total organic carbon and reached 2.1 mM CH4, whereas Ein Afek site EA2 contained approximately 5% carbon and accumulated 0.7-1.7 mM CH4. Both showed sulfate depletion, but EN exhibited pronounced sulfide accumulation, whereas EA2 showed greater dissolved iron and nutrient enrichment. Their classified methanogenic assemblages also differed. EA1 remained methane poor despite increasing carbon content with depth, while EA3 combined low carbon content and CH4 accumulation with detectable methanogens and lower methanogenic diversity. In a 36-day bottle experiments using sediments from two of the four wetland habitats, sucrose-amended EA3 exhibited a transient maximum of 18.8 mmol collected CH4 kg-1 wet sediment during Days 22-29, whereas EN reached its highest collected amount during Days 29-36. Methane proportions increased before the large output increase in EA3 but remained comparatively stable and high in EN. Soluble chemical oxygen demand trajectories and microbial community changes also differed. These findings identify distinct biogeochemical settings supporting methane accumulation and demonstrate methanogenic potential in low-CH4 sediment, emphasizing the complementary information provided by field profiles, microbial characterization, and exploratory enrichment experiments.

microbiology↗

The absence of microbiome in germ-free mice exacerbates the pathogenicity of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 MA10

Germ-free mice, which are devoid of microbiota, provide a powerful system to define the contribution of the microbiome to host responses during infection. Severe COVID-19 outcomes are associated with multiple comorbidities that are themselves characterized by microbiome dysbiosis; however, the causal role of the microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we use germ-free mouse models to evaluate the impact of the microbiome on disease severity following infection with mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 MA10. Comparison with conventionally housed mice revealed that the absence of the microbiome markedly exacerbates SARS-CoV-2-induced disease in both C57BL/6 and Swiss Webster backgrounds. Germ-free mice exhibited greater weight loss, impaired lung function, worsened pulmonary pathology, and pronounced alterations in circulating cytokine and chemokine profiles compared with conventional controls. These findings show that resident microbiota limit SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity and establish germ-free COVID-19 models as a powerful platform to identify protective microbial taxa and microbiota-based interventions to reduce severe disease.

microbiology↗