bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.10.10.681630

Enhancing CRISPR Education: A Plug-And-Play Framework for Teaching Gene Editing in Plant Biology

Abstract

Modern molecular biology tools and technologies such as CRISPR have sped up scientific discovery. From an educational perspective, these advancements are both exciting and overwhelming. Educators shaping these future scientists face the ongoing challenge of staying compliant with the latest developments in molecular biology while finding effective ways to teach these discoveries. As the use of CRISPR gene editing technology continues to expand globally, there is an increasing need for a workforce that is both knowledgeable about its theoretical foundations and trained in its practical use. While advanced, technology-driven STEM courses have the potential to improve student retention, they are often lecture-heavy and lack intentional engagement strategies that support deeper learning. Moreover, agriculture is the second most impacted sector by this technology, yet there is a significant lack of teaching materials focused on CRISPR in plant biology. To address these gaps, we developed a framework for teaching gene editing that incorporates multiple engagement strategies beyond traditional lecture-based instruction. This framework was implemented over two semesters in an Introduction to Gene Editing course at Tennessee State University, offered to both undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in a degree in Agricultural Sciences. This manuscript outlines the various strategies used in the course including active learning, multimodal instructional approaches and experiential learning strategies that can be adopted in other classrooms to effectively teach gene editing. Survey-based results from the course indicate a measurable increase in student comfort with designing and executing CRISPR-Cas based experiments. Societal Impact StatementPlant biology lacks accessible teaching materials for CRISPR, a powerful gene-editing technology widely used to improve agriculture. We developed an engaging framework to teach CRISPR concepts to advanced undergraduates and graduate students in plant sciences, which can be readily adopted by other instructors. The approach increased self-reported confidence in students and comfort in explaining CRISPR. Since instructors often have limited time to design interactive lessons, this framework offers a ready-to-use, effective strategy that makes CRISPR more widely available in classrooms, ultimately strengthening CRISPR literacy in the future agricultural workforce.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jain, D., Ali, F., Obunkukwu, G., Yammanuru, H., Zou, J., Obeng, J., Hughes, K. D., Joshi, L., Sudhakar, M., Adeyemi, O., Prestwich, P., Borzouei, S., Dharam, S. G., Singh Yadav, S. P., Khan, M. S., Parmar, R., Adhikari, U., Taheri, A., Taylor, R., Caruana, V., Williams, M., Roy, S.. 2025-10-13. Enhancing CRISPR Education: A Plug-And-Play Framework for Teaching Gene Editing in Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.10.681630

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Internal Grant Review: A Pre-Submission Program for Early-Career Clinical and Translational Researchers

The iTHRIV Scholars Mentored Career Development Program initiated an Internal Grant Review (IGR) program in 2020 for current and recently graduated Scholars seeking funding through K and R awards from the NIH. The IGR program is designed to replicate the NIH review process and provide Scholars the opportunity to receive valuable feedback on their applications prior to NIH submission. A key characteristic of the program is the integration of REDCap, enabling automation and year-round offering while improving tracking and reporting efforts and capabilities. Results of the program have been overall positive, both in proposal development and participant feedback. IGR is a sustainable, valuable resource for early-career faculty competing for limited resources in the pursuit to become independently funded clinical translational scientists.

scientific communication and education↗

Multi-Lab Testing of Early Preclinical Discoveries Identifies Promising Treatments

A fundamental challenge in drug development is the frequent failure of early laboratory research to translate into clinical benefit. One promising solution is to confirm findings from exploratory single-laboratory studies across multiple laboratories before clinical testing. We investigated this approach following the conduct of preclinical multi-laboratory studies across different fields of medicine. For this, we evaluated effect sizes, experimental rigor, and a set of criteria to identify determinants of confirmation success. When tested under increased rigor, only a fraction of multi-laboratory studies confirmed the initial results. The underlying effect size reduction was associated with outcome-relevant experimental differences between exploratory and confirmatory stages. In summary, multi-laboratory studies proved highly informative and served as an effective filter for promising treatments.

scientific communication and education↗

Technology-enhanced learning in undergraduate neuroscience education: tractography-based virtual dissection in psychology

Background: Neuroanatomy poses a significant challenge for Psychology students due to its spatial and conceptual complexity. Educational approaches that enhance the relevance and visualization of neuroanatomical content may improve students learning experiences. This study implemented a tractography-based activity focused on the virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus, a major white matter pathway, in undergraduate Psychology students and examined the relationships between perceived learning and students perceptions of utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Methods: First-year undergraduate Psychology students participated in a two-session tractography-based activity combining instruction on white matter anatomy and diffusion tractography with a hands-on virtual dissection of the arcuate fasciculus using research-grade software routinely employed in neuroscience research. Following the activity, students completed an anonymous questionnaire assessing perceived learning, utility, difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects of the activity. Pearson correlations, multiple regression analyses, and relative importance analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight students completed the questionnaire. Students reported generally positive perceptions of the activity across the evaluated dimensions, with perceived learning receiving the highest mean score (M = 3.44, SD = .85). Perceived utility showed the strongest association with perceived learning (r = .64, p < .001). The regression model explained 41% of the variance in perceived learning (R2 = .41, adjusted R2 = .38, p < .001). Perceived utility was the only significant predictor in the model ({beta} = .59, p = .001), accounting for 67.9% of the explained variance. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of integrating authentic neuroimaging tools into undergraduate neuroanatomy teaching. Students who perceived the activity as more useful also reported higher perceived learning outcomes, with perceived utility emerging as the strongest predictor of perceived learning. In contrast, perceived difficulty and handling, and organizational aspects did not make significant independent contributions. These results suggest that students perceptions of educational relevance may play an important role in technology-enhanced STEM learning experiences.

scientific communication and education↗