bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.10.07.680870

Evaluating peer-to-peer bioinformatics education: a case study of student learning outcomes and community impact in an undergraduate multi-omic data analysis course

Boohar, W. R.·Xu, K. Y.·Black, N.·Mogalipuvvu, M.·Manley, K.·Calabrese, P.·Lee, J. S. H.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Computational methodology has become ubiquitous in biomedical research with the rise of big data analysis and popularity of artificial intelligence and machine learning. However, undergraduate bioinformatics education has largely struggled to keep pace with the demand for bioinformatics skills, due to a combination of social and resource-based barriers. In this case study, we discuss the application and outcomes of Multi-Omic Data Analysis, a peer-to-peer learning-based undergraduate bioinformatics course offered by the Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology at the University of Southern California. Over eight semesters, a cohort of student instructors taught 2-3 weekly lectures to 107 undergraduate students in the Quantitative Biology Bachelor of Science degree program. Lectures covered a range of topics, including R and Python data analysis, scientific communication, and general research readiness as undergraduate students. We find that bioinformatics education courses structured around peer-to-peer learning have great potential to overcome many of the obstacles to comprehensive undergraduate bioinformatics education, and provide additional benefits related to student cohesion and community. We further discuss the longevity and feasibility of such courses, both specific to our program and in undergraduate universities at large. Author SummaryThere is a growing need for accessible and beginner-friendly bioinformatics education at the undergraduate level. Traditional coursework often fails to meet this demand due to disciplinary separation between biology and computer science, as well as limited institutional resources. We evaluate a unique approach involving a student-led undergraduate bioinformatics course at the University of Southern California to understand how peer-to-peer learning influences student development in computational biology. We examined over 100 students across eight academic semesters. Students varied in prior coding experience and research exposure. Through survey responses, we found that students left the course feeling more confident and prepared for research in faculty labs. Students reported improved competence in bioinformatics skills compared to before they took the course. We found that a major reason for this success was the peer-to-peer learning format. Students mentioned that learning from fellow students made the material more approachable and created a supportive community where they felt comfortable asking questions. Our work demonstrates that student-led initiatives can be a highly effective solution for filling critical gaps in university curricula, making bioinformatics education more accessible.

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and educationPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Boohar, W. R., Xu, K. Y., Black, N., Mogalipuvvu, M., Manley, K., Calabrese, P., Lee, J. S. H.. 2025-10-09. Evaluating peer-to-peer bioinformatics education: a case study of student learning outcomes and community impact in an undergraduate multi-omic data analysis course. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.07.680870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2026

PREP-aring is worth it: Success of the Case Western Reserve University Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program and its Scholars

The Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program (PREP), established by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) at the National Institutes of Health in 2000, was a research-intense, one-year training program for recent college graduates from backgrounds uncommon in science who intended to matriculate with a PhD or MD/PhD program in preparation for an eventual career in biomedical research. Case Western Reserve University had an NIGMS-supported PREP (CasePREP) from 2007 to 2025, the year NIGMS terminated the PREP funding mechanism. A major goal of CasePREP was to prepare post-baccalaureate trainees (termed Scholars) for graduate school, and major metrics of success were measured as Scholars who a) matriculated in and b) completed PhD or MD/PhD programs. A major goal of NIGMS-supported PREPs was the retention of these scientists in the biomedical research workforce. We report here the extent that CasePREP met program goals as well as the economic and scientific impact NIGMS-supported PREP has had for a variety of stakeholders. Data from 18 CasePREP cohorts included self-reported (surveys, interviews, questionnaires) and public data (websites, PubMed, NIH Reporter). Descriptive statistics and large language models were used to describe the major outcomes related to program goals and a new resilience course as well as Scholar productivity and contribution to science. Between 2007 and 2025, CasePREP was awarded $5.6 million USD and trained 108 Scholars. Most (89%) Scholars resided outside of Ohio prior to the start of CasePREP, with 38.89% from Puerto Rico. Almost all (98%) Scholars completed the one-year program in Cleveland, Ohio, and of those, 83% entered a PhD or MD/PhD program. As of September 2025, 46 Scholars have completed a PhD program, two Scholars have completed an MD/PhD program, and 27 are still in training. The attrition rate for CasePREP Scholars in graduate school is currently 14.77%, much lower than the attrition rates of national PhD programs. Most CasePREP Scholars (69.44%) are co-authors on one or more published manuscripts, and these 406 published works have garnered 14,261 total citations, with an average 35.04 citations per publication. Termination of PREP represents a five-year loss of [~]$2.7 million USD to CasePREP, a budget that would have trained an additional 30 Scholars. CasePREP was a great success as measured by its major outcomes. CasePREP Scholars have persisted in science and have made substantial contributions to the scientific workforce and enterprise. PREPs in general provided a crucial bridge for research talents who had little prior research opportunities to realize their potential and career goals. NIGMS termination of PREP support has negative economic consequences and endangers an important pathway to a career in science for Americans who would not otherwise have similar opportunities.

scientific communication and education↗
bioRxiv2025

The currency of research access: How undergraduates leverage social capital to gain research experience

BackgroundScience students who engage in undergraduate research experiences (UREs) benefit in numerous ways, including persisting in science at a higher rate compared to students who do not participate in UREs. However, UREs are a limited commodity and competition for access to these opportunities necessitates further investigation into why certain students succeed in accessing UREs, while others do not. Social capital, or the resources that students extract from their relationships with others, may play a key role in determining who engages in UREs. To begin to address this knowledge gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with students who had recently started UREs (n=21). Informed by Lins conceptual definition of social capital, we qualitatively analyzed these interviews to characterize the social capital that science undergraduates found useful for accessing research. ResultsStudents described leveraging ten unique forms of social capital when accessing UREs that aligned with Lins conceptualization. Specifically, students described utilizing social capital to garner information about available UREs and how to best navigate the path to accessing them, to reinforce their confidence in pursuing UREs, to influence the views of opportunity holders, and to serve as social credentials lending credibility to their aptitude for research. Although students detailed how faculty served as sources of all of these forms of capital, they also described advisors, employers, peers, and family as influential sources. Furthermore, their institutions served as a source of capital, and students themselves engaged in a variety of proactive behaviors to access UREs. ConclusionsHere we describe the forms and sources of social capital that science undergraduates use to access research, which can be used as an operational definition of the construct. Such a definition is necessary for future research aimed at measuring social capital for undergraduate research and identifying its antecedents, correlates, and consequences. We also describe how institutions can serve as sources of capital, and how students proactive behaviors play a role in their pursuit of UREs. This work provides an important starting point for determining the influence of social capital in accessing UREs and further broadening access to research in the sciences.

scientific communication and education↗