bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.09.30.679615

Effects of chemical modulators on enzyme specificity

Abstract

Chemical inhibitors bind to enzymes, thereby inhibiting their catalytic activity. While many enzymes catalyze reactions with a single substrate, others, like DNA polymerase, can act on multiple related substrates. Substrate-selective inhibitors (SSIs) target these multi-substrate enzymes to modulate their specificity. Although SSIs hold promise as therapeutics, our theoretical understanding of how different inhibitors influence enzyme specificity remains limited. In this study, we examine enzyme selectivity within kinetic networks corresponding to known inhibition mechanisms. We demonstrate that competitive and uncompetitive inhibitors do not affect substrate specificity, regardless of rate constants. In contrast, noncompetitive and mixed inhibition can alter specificity and can lead to non-monotonic responses to the inhibitor. We show that mixed and non-competitive inhibitors achieve substrate-selective inhibition by altering the effective free-energy barriers of product formation pathways that are enabled by the inhibitors presence. We then apply this framework to the Sirtuin-family deacylase SIRT2, showing that the suicide inhibitor thiomyristoyl lysine (TM) cannot influence substrate specificity unless there is a direct substrate exchange reaction or biochemical constraints are relaxed. These findings provide insights into engineering systems where cofactor binding modulates metabolic flux ratios.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hecht, A. D., Igoshin, O. A.. 2025-10-02. Effects of chemical modulators on enzyme specificity. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.30.679615

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Design of colipids with controlled lateral distance of head group moieties for targeting strategies in the field of lipid-based nanoparticles

Lipid nanoparticles and liposomes are nanoparticle drug formulations which are firmly established in clinics. In order to expand their application and improve efficacy, surface modifications can be a key strategy, especially for cell specific targeting. Targeting can be achieved by integrating ligand functionalized lipids or lipidoids on the nanoparticle surface. In this case, not solely the targeting ligand itself, but also the structure of the whole targeting lipid/lipidoid can affect the interaction of the targeting ligand with the binding motive on cells. Especially, distal spacer structures between lipid anchor and ligand unit, often composed of polyethylene glycol chains, provide a certain distance of the ligand from the nanoparticle surface. A concept which is currently neglected is the control of the lateral distance between ligand structures on the nanoparticle. Herein we investigated the possibility to design lipidoids with a lateral spacer composed of polyethylene glycol units. We synthesized and characterized different lipidoids which provide a primary amine in the head group for possible ligand coupling. In our model lipidoids the head groups were functionalized with a paramagnetic probe to apply electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) methods for the characterization of the lipidoid interaction with model nanoparticles, in our case liposomes. Continuous wave EPR was used to study the efficiency of the novel lipidoids to integrate into lipid bilayers of model liposomes, which was shown to depend on lipidoid structure and liposome composition. Furthermore, using double electron-electron resonance (DEER), we observed lipidoid conformational changes occurring upon integration into liposomes.

biophysics↗

Beyond Sequence and Structure: Pretraining PLMs on Continuous Biophysical Fields

We introduce the Biophysical Transformer, a protein language model that adds continuous biophysical fields as a third pretraining signal beside sequence and structure. A Poisson-Boltzmann solver computes the electrostatic potential around each three-residue token, and the model learns to predict it from sequence alone. A rotationally invariant spherical-harmonic descriptor serves as the loss target, eliminating the need for frame alignment during training and for coordinates at inference. Against a matched, one-flag control on the FLIP Meltome thermostability benchmark, the field objective raises Spearman correlation on every trained head of both human splits.The gain on human survives residualizing dipeptide composition under two architecturally different readouts and survives removing the test proteins that overlap the pretraining corpus. No effect survives on the organism-mixed split. At 1.1M parameters, both the Biophysical Transformer and its sequence-only control exceed FLIP's one-hot CNN and untrained-ESM baselines on every split. All results rest on a single pretraining run per arm,and the current design does not separate field content from generic regularization.

biophysics↗

An auditable harness for biomolecular dynamics simulations by AI agents

AI agents now generate biological hypotheses faster than they can be tested. Hypotheses stated at the atomic level can be examined with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. For new questions without a reference, trust in an agent-run simulation rests on a tool-written process record, not the agent's account. Existing MD agents leave this record to the language model. Here we present MDClaw, a harness whose validating tools and directed acyclic graph (DAG) check stages before execution and record every simulation stage. On MDDataBench, which grades outputs against deposited simulations, four open-weight models with MDClaw passed all three runs on 81-100% of 31 test systems. The DAG complements this outcome check. An ablation without the DAG revealed 11 successful runs that had skipped minimization or equilibration, or simulated a different structure. MDClaw carried questions from human and AI scientists through simulation to trajectories traceable to their inputs and settings.

biophysics↗