bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.09.15.676228

Coinfection with malaria alters the dynamics and fitness of an intestinal nematode

Abstract

Infections with soil transmitted helminths (STHs) are highly prevalent in humans living in the intertropical region. While, in most cases, STHs can establish chronic infections, the dynamics of the infection can be altered when other parasites exploit the same host. These changes can have consequences in terms of the health of the host, the epidemiology of the disease (e.g., the duration of the infection and the inter-host transmission success) and the fitness of the parasite. Here, we investigated if the coinfection with Plasmodium yoelii alters the dynamics and the fitness of the murine nematode Heligmosomoides polygyrus. We found that, compared to single infected mice, coinfection produced an increase in the number of excreted eggs, while the biomass of adult worms in the intestine did not differ between single infected and coinfected mice. Moreover, the increase in egg excretion was also observed when Plasmodium infected hosts that had been harboring the nematode during the past four weeks (i.e., when the population size of adult worms can only decrease due to mortality). Therefore, the enhanced shedding of eggs reflects a plastic adjustment of worm fecundity to the environment provided by a coinfected host. This plastic response was modulated by the host Th2 immunity, as coinfection inhibited IL-4 and IL-13 gene expression, plasma levels of IL-5 and IL-13, and the expansion of GATA-3+ CD4+ T cells in the spleen. In agreement with this, experimentally inhibiting IL-13 with neutralizing antibodies reproduced the results observed in coinfected mice (an increase in egg excretion), while the administration of recombinant IL-13 reduced egg shedding. Interestingly, coinfection had a net positive effect on parasite fitness as shown by a longer persistence within the host and higher cumulative number of eggs excreted up to 99 days post-infection. Although the gene expression of Th2 cytokines was lower at day 99 p.i., coinfected mice still had a downregulated expression compared to single infected hosts. These results show that coinfection with Plasmodium has the potential to affect the epidemiology of STHs by increasing the number of eggs excreted over the whole infectious period and maintaining a larger environmental reservoir of transmissible stages. Author SummaryCoinfection between soil-transmitted helminths and malaria is common in several countries of the intertropical region, especially among the most vulnerable populations. Coinfection has the potential to worsen the symptoms caused by malaria, therefore it is important to understand what are the epidemiological and ecological factors that promote the occurrence of coinfection. Transmission of soil-transmitted helminths usually requires human contact with transmissible stages (parasitic eggs or larvae) in the environment; therefore, high egg excretion in the feces of infected people is a key factor contributing to maintain a reservoir of infective stages from which humans can get infected. In this study, we experimentally investigated whether coinfection with malaria alters the dynamics (egg excretion, infection persistence) of a murine intestinal nematode. We found that hosts infected with malaria and subsequently infected with the nematode, excreted more nematode eggs for a longer period, compared to single infected hosts. These changes were mediated by an impaired Th2 immune response in coinfected hosts. These results suggest that malaria coinfection produces positive feedback on key epidemiological traits of the nematode that can further enhance the risk of malaria/helminths cooccurrence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bourbon, L., Dusuel, A., Groetz, E., Rialland, M., Roche, B., Faivre, B., Sorci, G.. 2025-09-17. Coinfection with malaria alters the dynamics and fitness of an intestinal nematode. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.15.676228

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Isoform inflation and annotation heterogeneity can confound Kunitz-repertoire comparisons in blood-feeding animals: a gene-level reappraisal

Hematophagy has arisen independently many times across Metazoa, and recurrent anticoagulant protein families in blood-feeders are often read as convergent recruitment - the Kunitz/BPTI domain a paradigm case, with the leech an oft-cited low-Kunitz exception. We re-examine this at the gene level and ask whether a confirmatory cross-phylum test of this blood-feeding/anticoagulant association is feasible with public genomes. Applying an auditable gene-level protocol (one longest-isoform representative per gene; conservation-checked protein to gene mapping) to eight metazoan lineages, we find no consistent, universal elevation of whole-genome gene-level Kunitz-repertoire size in these blood-feeders (blood-feeder median 18 genes vs non-blood-feeder median 39; a descriptive comparison of non-independent taxa, not a formal test). Protein-entry counts inflate gene-level Kunitz counts by up to ~4.6x (mosquito 23 to 5), and neither this inflation nor proteome-wide isoform density (1.0-2.7x) tracks diet, so protein-entry comparisons are an unreliable basis for repertoire claims. Separately, deterministic bookkeeping under a fixed topology and a no-reversal rule counts 12 independent blood-feeding origins (11 if the ancestral lamprey is treated as parasitic with two losses); a non-exhaustive screen of annotated public genomes yielded only one candidate blood/non-blood pair (bedbug), and, under the pre-registered simulation scenario, only a cross-origin heterogeneity endpoint is attainable within a realistic origin ceiling, and only under strong heterogeneity (among-origin SD >= 3-4). An exploratory, feasibility-grade secretome-composition estimate did not meet the pre-registered criterion. We offer a gene-level, annotation-aware re-analysis, a caution about isoform/annotation bias in cross-phylum comparisons, and an account of what current data can and cannot support.

evolutionary biology↗

Denisovan introgression left differential selection regimes in Humans and Neanderthals on the SLC30A9 gene

Signals of positive selection around the SLC30A9 gene have been reported in human populations outside Africa. Selection likely acted on a highly differentiated single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs1047626, leading to a non-synonymous substitution in the encoded zinc transporter. Because of the striking similarity between the putatively selected SLC30A9 haplotype observed in several current human populations and the Denisovan individual, previous work has proposed adaptive introgression. Yet alternative explanations, including ancient human variation, and the precise archaic source -Neanderthal or Denisovan- remained unresolved. Considering the potentially complex evolution of SLC30A9, we applied Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) algorithms coupled to machine learning to investigate the most plausible evolutionary origin of this substitution. After modelling different evolutionary scenarios with forward-in-time simulations, our results highlight that the most probable scenario is a Denisovan origin of the rs1047626 polymorphism. However, the allele likely introgressed into Neanderthals first and was then passed into non-African modern humans. Moreover, the derived allele frequency for rs1047626 across several African populations is consistent with back-to-Africa migrations. Finally, our ABC analyses indicate strong positive selection in East Asian populations and other out-of-Africa populations, whereas in Neanderthal populations, the selection coefficient was probably neutral or slightly deleterious.

evolutionary biology↗

Distinct associative learning abilities for colour and odour in the flower-feeding Drosophila elegans and the fruit-feeding Drosophila melanogaster

Animal behaviour is both innately constrained and shaped by learning. This mosaic organization has evolved in response to species-specific ecological demands and may differ between sensory modalities. Flower-visiting animals are a particularly useful system for investigating the relationship between sensory ecology and learning because they rely on multiple floral cues, particularly odour and colour, to locate food sources. However, it remains largely unexplored whether specialization on floral resources entails divergence in learning abilities across sensory modalities. Drosophila elegans is a flower-feeding species that depends heavily on floral resources throughout its life; adults spend much of their time on flowers and larvae develop on fallen flower leaves. Here, we compared odour-reward and colour-reward associative learning between the flower-feeding D. elegans and the fruit-feeding D. melanogaster. We found that, under conditions of equilibrated motivation, odour- and colour-preference, and using the same sugar reward, D. elegans exhibited poorer odour-reward learning performance but better colour-reward learning performance than D. melanogaster. These results suggest that the modality-specific eligibility of sensory information to enter into associations, known as the 'Garcia-effect' in experimental psychology, can evolve oppositely between species. This highlights the relationship between ecological specialization and mnemonic processing, and shows that biological 'intelligence' is not general.

evolutionary biology↗