Long-Read Sequencing of the MUC1 VNTR: Genomic Variation, Mutational Landscape, and Its Impact on ADTKD Diagnosis and Progression

Abstract

BackgroundADTKD-MUC1 is caused by frameshift mutations in MUC1 gene that produce a frameshifted protein (MUC1fs) toxic to kidney cells. The genes variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), with high GC content, makes it largely inaccessible to standard sequencing. As a result, both the reference sequence and natural variation in this region remain poorly defined, complicating mutation detection and data interpretation. Standard methods also fail to pinpoint the exact VNTR unit affected, limiting insight into mutation mechanisms and genotype-phenotype correlations. MethodsWe employed Single Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing and characterized the genomic sequence of MUC1 in 300 individuals including 279 individuals from 143 families suspected of having ADTKD-MUC1. We compared these results to those obtained using the CLIA-approved mass spectrometry-based probe extension (PE) assay, which specifically detect the most prevalent 59dupC mutation. We correlated the structural features of the MUC1 VNTR with the rate of kidney function decline in affected individuals. ResultsWe identified MUC1 consensus sequences for 205 unique VNTR alleles, with 9 distinct types of frameshift mutations present on 52 distinct mutated VNTR alleles. MUC1 frameshift mutations were identified in 71 of 143 families (50%) with suspected ADTKD, comprising 135 genetically affected individuals (48%). The SMRT assay exhibited complete concordance and revealed that the PE assay is capable of detecting frameshift mutations in approximately 85% of affected families. The constellation of VNTR structures supports a genotype-progression model, in which fast progressors exhibit a significantly lower number of repeat units on the wild-type allele and a higher number of repeats on the mutation-bearing allele, including an increased number of frameshifted repeat units. ConclusionsSMRT sequencing outperforms current diagnostic methods for ADTKD-MUC1 and reveals the prognostic value of VNTR structures. Although their contribution to disease progression is modest ([~]6% variance explained), it remains biologically and clinically meaningful. Key Points 3O_LISingle Molecule, Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing of MUC1 outperforms existing genetic and immunohistochemical methods for ADTKD-MUC1 diagnosis. C_LIO_LICLIA-approved mass spectrometry-based genotyping assay, complemented by SMRT sequencing, can detect nearly all ADTKD-MUC1 patients. C_LIO_LIDisease progression correlates with VNTR pattern: fast progressors have fewer WT repeats and more mutant/frameshifted repeats C_LI