bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.08.13.670232

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century

Abstract

Citizen science plays an increasingly important role in generating scientific knowledge and supporting environmental and social action. However, its potential to address complex global challenges remains underutilised. This study explores how to improve citizen science by involving the public in all stages of scientific research. Using participatory research methods, we conducted online surveys and group discussions with researchers, citizen scientists, and Indigenous people. Thematic coding was used to identify key challenges, opportunities, and best practices to enhance citizen science initiatives. Additionally, nine case studies were reported using the Standardised Data on Initiatives (STARDIT) reporting tool. The study identifies key strategies for enhancing participant engagement and retention in citizen science initiatives. Findings underscore the importance of inclusive, evidence-informed approaches such as targeted outreach, fair compensation, tailored support, and co-creation practices. Ensuring data quality and fostering trust require adherence to FAIR data principles, transparent validation and sharing processes, and the establishment of ethical research partnerships. Persistent challenges include short-term funding, which undermines long-term project sustainability, and the lack of centralized support for ethics and project management. Formal recognition of citizen scientists through co-authorship, standardized training, and professional development opportunities can further strengthen involvement and build capacity. Finally, emerging technologies--including AI and open data platforms--present opportunities to scale and improve efficiency, provided they are implemented with appropriate ethical safeguards and investment. Drawing together these insights, we provide 10 actionable recommendations for citizen science in the 21st century. These highlight the importance of embedding citizen science in national research infrastructure, education, and policy, alongside consistent evaluation and reporting, to improve its inclusivity, longevity, and impact. We conclude by arguing that as the world confronts climate change, public health crises, and biodiversity loss, broader public involvement in science is key for equitable, efficient and evidence-informed responses.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nunn, J. S., da Silva Hyldmo, H., McKnight, L., McCulloch, H., Lavers, J., Old, J., Smith, L., Grobler, N., Tan Kay Yin, C., Chan, W. Y., Raeburn, C., Simard, N. S. M., Kingsley Smith, A., Van Holsbeeck, S., Drinkwater, E., Prendergast, K., Burrows, E., Lawson, C. L.. 2025-08-17. 10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.13.670232

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

Leveraging a hybrid cross-disciplinary training model to accelerate global bioinformatics capacity

Disparities in formal bioinformatics training exacerbate the global skills gap, impeding the democratized application of advanced genomic technologies. To bridge this divide, we introduce a scalable, hybrid training framework designed to rapidly accelerate regional bioinformatics capacity. We exemplify this approach through the Eastern European Bioinformatics and Genomics (EEBG) workshop series -- a cross-disciplinary initiative that pairs international faculty with local institutions to deliver modular, hands-on curricula. Functioning as a structured knowledge-transfer pipeline, the series has catalyzed a sustainable educational ecosystem, evidenced by the establishment of multiple independent summer schools across the region. The assessment of the 2025 EEBG workshop in Krakow, Poland, validates the models viability; participant metrics confirm high efficacy in skill acquisition (mean satisfaction: 4.4/5.0) and community building. Crucially, the hybrid delivery mode dismantled geographic barriers, serving as a vital mechanism for maintaining scientific continuity for researchers facing displacement and crisis. Synthesizing these outcomes, we define the core features of a replicable blueprint for scientific readiness in resource-constrained environments. We conclude by presenting a strategic roadmap -- organized around infrastructure standardization, governance sustainability, and geographical expansion -- for adapting this regional proof-of-concept into a global export-ready model, offering a critical path toward ensuring universal access to genomic innovation.

scientific communication and education↗

Cloud-Connected Pluripotent Stem Cell Platform Enhances Scientific Identity in Underrepresented Students

Stem cell research offers unique opportunities for authentic scientific engagement, yet infrastructure requirements have confined participation to elite institutions, perpetuating workforce disparities. We developed an integrated framework combining engineered biology, cloud-connected microscopy, and validated psychometric assessment to make pluripotent stem cell (PSC) experimentation widely accessible. The framework comprises three components: a doxycycline-inducible NGN2 mouse embryonic stem cell line for rapid neuronal specification, low-cost cloud microscopy for remote observation, and the validated Stem Cell Research Identity Scale (SCRIS) for quantifying educational outcomes. Implementation across a Title I high school and urban community college demonstrated significant increases in scientific identity. Students using differentiating PSCs showed broader science identity development than those using neuroblastoma cells, particularly in competence, research readiness, and recognition. High school students showed enhanced research competence gains compared to community college students despite equivalent intervention duration. Demographic analyses revealed enhanced effectiveness for Hispanic and first-generation college students. This framework provides a scalable model for broadening participation in advanced biomedical research.

scientific communication and education↗