bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.08.01.667982

The impact of climate change on transmission season length: West Nile virus as a case study

Abstract

BackgroundClimate change is accelerating the spread of temperature-sensitive vector-borne diseases such as West Nile virus (WNV), the most widespread mosquito-borne disease in the United States, with 2,400 reported cases in 2024. In New York State (NYS), where WNV first emerged in the U.S., mean temperatures have increased by 1.4{degrees}C since the early 1900s. Although temperature is a well-established driver of WNV transmission, its effect on transmission season length remains poorly quantified. This study examines whether WNV transmission seasons have lengthened in NYS and whether these changes are associated with increased disease risk, shifts in seasonal timing, and anthropogenic climate change. MethodsWe integrated daily county-level observational data from 1999-2024, including temperature, mosquito surveillance, and human case data, with climate model simulations spanning 1850-2024 to assess trends in transmission season length. FindingsBased on observed temperature suitability, the WNV transmission season in NYS has lengthened by an average of 20 days over the past 25 years, beginning 3.8 days earlier and ending 16.3 days later. Longer transmission seasons are positively associated with higher WNV prevalence in both mosquito vectors and humans. While such changes could occur in the absence of global warming, climate model analyses indicate that the observed increase in season length is 6.4 times more likely under historical climate forcing since 1900 than under pre-industrial conditions. InterpretationThese findings demonstrate that climate change is reshaping the phenology and burden of WNV transmission. FundingSupported by NIH, NSF, Stanford University, and the Fogarty International Center. Research in ContextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched Google Scholar for publications from 1999 to 2024 using the term "West Nile virus and season length," yielding 18,200 results. Previous studies focused on how climatic factors affect transmission and its seasonality in the United States, but none assessed how climate change influences transmission season duration. We analyzed over two decades of data to link extended WNV transmission seasons with increased vector and human prevalence. Additionally, we evaluated the causal role of climate warming using simulated climate data and counterfactual analyses. Added value of this studyUsing daily temperature and WNV case data from 1999- 2024, we found that the WNV transmission season in NYS has lengthened by an average of 20 days. The season now begins 3.8 days earlier and ends 16.3 days later. Longer seasons were associated with higher prevalence in mosquitoes and humans. Climate model simulations indicate that human-driven greenhouse gas emissions have significantly extended the WNV season, making observed trends in season length, onset, and conclusion 6, 2, and 16 times more likely, with implications for mosquito infection and human disease risk. Implications of all available evidenceOur findings suggest that climate change is lengthening WNV transmission seasons, a phenomenon likely relevant to other temperature-sensitive vector-borne diseases. As warming continues, extended transmission seasons may amplify risks for WNV and other vector-borne diseases, underscoring the need for climate-adaptive public health surveillance and intervention strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fay, R. L., Glidden, C. K., Ciota, A., Mordecai, E. A.. 2025-08-02. The impact of climate change on transmission season length: West Nile virus as a case study. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.01.667982

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

PlanktonLake-CEREEP- A Freshwater Plankton Image Dataset with Semi-Automated Label Cleaning

Plankton plays a fundamental role in aquatic ecosystems, influencing biogeochemical cycles and serving as a key food source for many organisms. Recent high-throughput imaging technologies enable the rapid acquisition of large volumes of microscopic images, creating new opportunities for monitoring planktonic ecosystems. However, the manual processing and annotation of the vast amounts of data generated by these devices remain time-consuming tasks. In this context, machine learning-based classification models offer a promising solution. In this data paper, we introduce a new labeled freshwater plankton dataset comprising approximately 88,000 images distributed across 43 taxa. We also present the labeling assistance method we used to facilitate dataset annotation. Finally, we present a baseline based on a convolutional neural network (CNN), which achieves a classification accuracy of 93% on our dataset.

ecology↗

A training protocol for human classification of Asian elephant images from trail cameras

Trail cameras have become ubiquitous tools for ecological data collection over recent decades. Despite progress in the development of automated algorithms and artificial intelligence for image classification, our ability to process large volumes of data remain limited by the need for trained human observers to make refined judgements. We provide guidance on placement of trail cameras for observing Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) and outline a protocol for training and testing naive human observers in performing image classifications (age/sex class and group composition) that cannot yet be automated. This process can be used to develop a high-throughput workflow capable of extracting useful data from large volumes of images. Our training material consisted of 14,007 images collected from 6 trail cameras around Udawalawe National Park in Sri Lanka from 2017-2019. In the first stage, expert observers (n=3) trained a group of inexperienced participants (n=4), who engaged in an iterative process to develop a protocol document. The document was then tested on a second set of subjects (n=6) each of whom classified 350 test images in four separate sequential batches using quantitative measures of precision and accuracy. The test set was sampled from 54,435 images from an additional 25 cameras. When compared to expert observers, they achieved a fair level of precision (Fleiss' kappa = 0.247) and 82.6% accuracy. Our approach can usefully be extended to other species and contexts.

ecology↗

Forest belowground productivity and carbon allocation predominantly driven by soil properties rather than climate

Forests are threatened by a multitude of stressors, including anthropogenic disturbances and climate change. Assessing how forests will respond to these stressors requires a comprehensive understanding of net primary productivity (Npp), environmental constraints on growth, and adaptive capacity. A parameter of significant uncertainty is belowground Npp (bNpp), which can account for up to 80% of total Npp but is poorly estimated and rarely measured directly. We used a cross-biome dataset of direct, field-based measurements of aboveground and belowground primary productivity and 21 climatic and soil variables to identify potential constraints on bNpp and belowground carbon allocation in boreal and cold temperate forests. Soil variables, rather than climate variables, were the main drivers of bNpp and belowground allocation across biomes. The importance of soil variables suggests that soil nutrient dynamics, especially soil nutrient pool and flux variables, must be explicitly modeled to more accurately predict feedbacks between climate, productivity, and within-tree carbon allocation. Within biomes, environmental drivers of belowground allocation varied between low versus high allocation forests, indicating that environmental drivers are site-specific and the development of within-biome, site-scale classifications for forest ecosystems could be useful. Changes in soil variables, such as increasing soil nitrogen pools, caused abrupt and large decreases in bNpp for boreal, but not cold temperate forests. Threshold-like shifts indicate that boreal forests might have lower adaptive capacity and higher sensitivity to disturbances than cold temperate forests. With 70% of boreal forests characterized by low bNpp, disturbances such as anthropogenic nitrogen deposition could cause large-scale decreases in bNpp that could push these forests beyond their adaptive capacity.

ecology↗