bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.29.667030

Optimal tuning not required: Birds communicate effectively with mismatched auditory filters.

Abstract

Birds have one of the most remarkable vocal capacities of vertebrates. Yet we know little about the relationship between their hearing and their vocal capacities at large phylogenetic scales, and whether these traits coevolve in a tight or loose fashion. Here we collected vocal and auditory data for 72 bird species from 15 different orders, and tested if hearing is finely tuned to the spectral composition of their vocalizations (i.e., the matched-filter hypothesis). We found bird audition not to be predictive of vocal frequency, and mismatches between hearing and vocalizations to be widespread. We show that the source of these mismatches is allometric: the auditory tuning and the spectral composition of vocalizations scale with body weight to different degrees. Despite the general frequency mismatches, bird hearing remains remarkably sensitive to the main spectral component of their vocalizations. Our results challenge the view that sensory systems must be finely tuned only to conspecific signals for communication to be effective. Our results suggest that selection for a broad auditory tuning has allowed birds to effectively communicate with conspecifics while at the same time permitting general environmental awareness using auditory cues. We argue that the relationship between hearing and vocalizations in birds is better described by the concept of diffuse coevolution, where organism evolve in relation to their broader ecological context instead than on a strictly dyadic fashion. Significance StatementAnimal communication theory often states that signalers and perceivers coevolve, yet the spread and nature of this relationship remains unclear. We tested whether the auditory tuning of birds is tightly matched to the frequency content of their vocalizations -an expected outcome of strong coevolution and the matched-filter hypothesis. We show that although birds hearing does not precisely align with their vocalizations, birds are still highly sensitive to the sounds they produce. This is due to the broad tuning of the avian auditory systems, which supports effective conspecific communication while also allowing the detection of other ecologically relevant sounds. Thus, birds exemplify diffuse rather than tightly coupled coevolution in communication systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Munoz, M. I., Halfwerk, W.. 2025-08-01. Optimal tuning not required: Birds communicate effectively with mismatched auditory filters.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.29.667030

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Geometry of antigenic evolution improves influenza vaccine selection

Anticipating antigenic evolution is essential for selecting effective seasonal influenza A/H3N2 vaccine strains. To this end, we integrated hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization titers spanning 2002 to 2025 into a unified Bayesian antigenic map. The map resolves twelve antigenic clusters advancing in discrete steps, with several clusters co-circulating in most seasons. In 15 of 21 seasons, the WHO-recommended vaccine belonged to an earlier cluster than the dominant circulating cluster. The direction of each vaccine update relative to recent viral drift predicted vaccine effectiveness one season ahead in out-of-sample forecasts. Antigenic distance, the conventional measure of vaccine-virus match, was weakly associated with effectiveness until update direction was accounted for. Retrospectively ranking candidate strains by predicted effectiveness would have selected a strain predicted to outperform the WHO recommendation in every season, raising mean predicted effectiveness by 10 percentage points.

evolutionary biology↗

Evolutionary replay of duplicate-gene retention across independent whole-genome duplications

Whole-genome duplications repeatedly expose ancestral gene lineages to the same broad evolutionary outcome-retention or loss of duplicated copies-but it remains unclear whether this history replays similarly across evolutionary scales. We placed duplicate retention in shared hierarchical orthologous-group coordinates and compared percentile ranks defined within each event-wide mapped universe. Three independent angiosperm whole-genome duplications showed reproducible replay (global rank effect T-replay = 0.210, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.172-0.248; permutation P = 1/100,001). A plant reference-panel score specified before target outcomes were examined predicted retention after the Apple/Pear duplication ({rho} = 0.169, n = 373). Deep transfer was heterogeneous: the teleost-genome-duplication estimate was positive but unresolved ({rho} = 0.107, n = 151, 95% confidence interval -0.050 to 0.260), whereas transfer to the ancient budding-yeast whole-genome duplication (yeast WGD) was supported ({rho} = 0.280, n = 186). Independently reconstructed animal outcomes also replayed between teleost and Stylommatophora duplications (r = 0.226, n = 146, P = 0.00326), although the effect remained below a prespecified strong-effect threshold. A strict plant-animal comparison was limited to 25 deeply one-to-one lineages and was unresolved (r = 0.033, 95% confidence interval -0.303 to 0.340). Thus, ancestral gene-lineage identity contributes reproducibly to duplicate retention after independent whole-genome duplications, but replay is structured by evolutionary lineage and modified by event-specific history rather than governed by one universal gene-fate ranking.

evolutionary biology↗

A Hymenoptera-restricted gene mediating ant castes co-opts deeply conserved machinery to control organ size

Lineage-specific genes are widespread and have been implicated as phenotypic innovation inducers, but how they acquire complex developmental functions remains poorly understood. Ant queens and workers develop dramatically different organ sizes from identical genomes under juvenile hormone (JH) control, yet the molecular effectors translating JH signalling into caste-specific organ growth remain unknown. Here we identify torch, a Hymenoptera-restricted gene, as the most consistently gyne-biased and JH-responsive gene across 68 ant species. Knockdown of torch in virgin queens of Monomorium pharaonis produces a worker-like, multi-organ growth-restricted phenotype. Mechanistically, torch harbours an E-box-like motif activated by the JH receptor Gce-Tai and acts as a GA-repeat-binding transcription factor that regulates Hippo signalling, the deeply conserved organ-size control pathway in animals. Expressing torch heterologously in mice and a growth-restricted Drosophila background shows that the gene retained its general growth-promoting activity across more than 700 million years of animal evolution in lineages that lack the gene, establishing that its function is mediated through conserved rather than ant-specific machinery. A lineage-specific gene can therefore acquire complex morphogenetic function by co-opting ancient organ-size circuitry, providing a general route by which novel genes can drive phenotypic innovation.

evolutionary biology↗