bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.29.666780

Transcriptomic profiling and machine learning uncover gene signatures of psoriasis endotypes and disease severity

Abstract

BackgroundDespite increased understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis, molecular classification of clinical phenotypes and disease severity is poorly defined. Knowledge gaps include whether molecular endotypes of psoriasis underlie distinct clinical phenotypes and the positive and negative molecular regulators of disease severity across tissue compartments. MethodsWe performed comprehensive RNA-sequencing of skin and blood (n=718) from prospectively-recruited, deeply-phenotyped discovery and replication cohorts of 146 subjects with moderate-to-severe psoriasis initiating TNF-inhibitor (adalimumab) or IL-12/23-inhibitor (ustekinumab) therapy. ResultsUsing two complementary methods for dimensionality reduction, we defined distinct but interconnected co-expression modules and factors within skin and blood that were significantly associated with disease phenotypes and disease severity, as measured by Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). We identified a 14-gene signature negatively associated with BMI in nonlesional skin and disease severity in lesional skin, respectively. Genotype integration revealed that HLA-DQA1*01 and HLA-DRB1*15 genotypes were positively associated with baseline disease severity. Using Gaussian process regression followed by SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), we defined two core drug independent and disease severity-associated gene modules in lesional skin - one positive, one negative - and a lesional 9-gene signature predictive of disease severity. Disease severity signatures in blood were only seen following adalimumab exposure, suggesting greater systemic impact of adalimumab compared to ustekinumab, in line with its side effect profile. In contrast, a gene signature in blood linked to HLA-C*06:02 status was independent of disease severity or drug. ConclusionsThese findings delineate gene-environmental and genetic effects on the psoriasis transcriptome linked to disease severity. Plain Language SummaryPsoriasis is a common and debilitating skin disease, linked to multiple other inflammatory conditions. A lot is known about the mechanism of psoriasis and its inherited and external influences. Despite this, doctors cannot yet offer personalised treatments as it has been difficult to discover whether biological pathways are associated with disease severity, response to treatment or a persons likelihood of having other linked diseases. To help address this, we collected skin and blood samples and the personal characteristics of a group of people with severe psoriasis across the United Kingdom. Using computer-based methods, we discovered common biological processes underlying different psoriasis types, including genes that connect psoriasis severity with obesity, and another set of genes that help predict disease severity.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rider, A. C., Grantham, H. J., Smith, G. R., Watson, D. S., Casement, J., Cockell, S. J., Gisby, J., Foulkes, A. C., Henkin, R., Iqbal, W. A., Ewen, T., Amarnath, S., Ng, S., Zuliani, P., Dand, N., Stocken, D., Traini, C., Thomas, E., Kalyana-Sundaram, S., Rajpal, D. K., Smith, K. M., Barker, J. N., Griffiths, C. E., Di Meglio, P., Smith, C. H., Warren, R. B., Barnes, M. R., Reynolds, N. J., PSORT consortium,. 2025-08-01. Transcriptomic profiling and machine learning uncover gene signatures of psoriasis endotypes and disease severity. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.29.666780

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Parsimonious Creatures: Building Gene Regulatory Networks Robust to Somatic Evolution

For early multicellular life to have formed and maintained cellular organization, preventing loss of controlled cell replication due to somatic evolution was of critical importance, and remains important to this day for control of cancer. We study how gene regulatory networks (GRNs) can be designed to slow the divergence of somatic clonal lineages in the context of early multicellular life. We model the mutation of GRNs within simplified 12-celled organisms we term "parsimonious creatures", who must replicate from a single cell to 12 cells and then prevent replication past 12 cells to maximize fitness. We found two minimal motifs can achieve these goals, but both are prone to breakdown through somatic evolution: The feedforward motif, which is loosely regulating but relatively robust, and the simple step motif, which uses strong interactions and feedback to form memoryless ultrasensitivity, but is fragile. These simple motifs may be duplicated to form redundant networks via one of two structures: averaging redundancy, which averages multiple sources of information, and min redundancy, which adopts the most conservative source. Averaging redundancy uniformly slows somatic evolution, while min redundancy stalls somatic evolution until neutral mutations accumulate. Either may be superior dependent on life history. However, averaging redundancy slowly increases fitness as the network becomes larger, but large min redundancy networks eventually become "paralyzed", increasing the probability of senescence and reducing fitness. These GRN designs are idealized, yet provide imperfect solutions with fundamental tradeoffs, offering insight as to why somatic evolution remains an incompletely solved problem for multicellular life.

systems biology↗

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗