bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.24.666612

Age and Sex Influence Diurnal Memory Oscillations, Circadian Rhythmicity, and Per1 Expression

Abstract

BackgroundThe circadian system influences many different biological processes across the lifespan, including memory performance and daily activity patterns. The biological process of aging causes decreased control of the circadian system that is accompanied by a decline in memory performance, suggesting that these two processes may be linked. Indeed, our previous work has shown that in male mice, the clock gene Per1 functions within the dorsal hippocampus to exert diurnal control over memory and repression of Per1 in the old hippocampus contributes to age-related impairments in spatial memory. Although it is clear that Per1 may be a key molecular link between memory and the circadian rhythm, next to nothing is known about how sex impacts this role in the young or old brain. Here, we are interested in understanding how the factors of sex and age impact memory performance, circadian activity patterns, sleep behavior, and hippocampal Per1 expression. MethodsWe used a combination of spatial memory (Object Location Memory (OLM)) and circadian activity monitoring to determine how male and female mice change across the lifespan. In addition, we used RT-qPCR to quantify the change in Per1 levels in response to learning in young and old, male and female mice. ResultsYoung female mice resist diurnal oscillations in memory, showing robust spatial memory across the diurnal cycle. In contrast, old female mice show an emergence of diurnal memory oscillations, with better memory during the day than at night (similar to what we observed previously in young male mice). In contrast, old male mice showed better memory performance during the night than the day, suggesting that their peak memory performance is drastically shifted compared to young males. We also measured activity patterns and sleep behavior across the diurnal cycle and found that sex was more of an influence than age in multiple analyses, but age did have an impact, with old male mice showing stronger circadian rhythm disruptions than any other cohort. Finally, we investigated whether the circadian clock gene Per1 plays a role in these sex- and age-dependent effects in diurnal memory performance. We found that, in general, learning- induced Per1 and memory performance peaked at similar times of day in each group, consistent with our hypothesis that Per1 exerts diurnal control over memory performance. ConclusionsThis work supports a role for Per1 in exerting diurnal control over memory and suggests that Per1 may be an appealing therapeutic target to improve memory and circadian dysfunction in old age. HighlightsO_LIDiurnal oscillations in spatial memory are sex- and age-dependent in mice C_LIO_LIPer1 learning-induced expression matches diurnal memory patterns C_LIO_LICircadian rhythm patterns are sex- and age-dependent in mice C_LIO_LIYoung females show good memory across the diurnal cycle C_LIO_LIDiurnal memory oscillations reemerge in old female mice C_LI Plain language summaryMemory is an integral part of everyday functioning, and one that is known to decline with aging. Our lab has previously shown that the clock gene Period1 (Per1) regulates spatial memory performance in young males, establishing a molecular link between circadian rhythms and memory. Young adult male mice show diurnal oscillations in memory consolidation, with the best memory occurring at midday, and the worst memory occurring at midnight. In the current study, we wanted to expand our work to young adult females, as well as an aged population of male and female mice. Using a simple spatial memory task, we measured diurnal changes in both memory performance and Per1 gene expression within the dorsal hippocampus (a brain region necessary for spatial memory). We found that old mice (both male and female) showed a correlation between high Per1 levels and better memory, as we have previously seen. Conversely, young female mice performed well on the memory task at every timepoint but didnt have a significant change in Per1, indicating that they may be using some different mechanism to modulate memory performance. Finally, we used infrared activity monitoring to investigate several circadian rhythm related measures in young and old, male and female mice. We found that sex influenced the circadian rhythm more than age, and the group with the largest circadian disruption was aged males. Overall, this research provides new information about how both sex and age impact diurnal oscillations in both memory and activity, fundamental knowledge that has been lacking in the field.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bellfy, L., Pifer, G. C., von Abo, M. J., Smies, C. W., Bernhardt, A. R., Perumal, A., Jackson, M. J., Kwapis, J. L.. 2025-07-31. Age and Sex Influence Diurnal Memory Oscillations, Circadian Rhythmicity, and Per1 Expression. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.24.666612

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Social costs of group life: Larger groups have less affiliative behavior and more social conflict

The costs and benefits of sociality depend in part upon the size of groups. Therefore, individual behavior should vary across groups of different sizes, reflecting group size-dependent costs and benefits. Here, we test this prediction using a long-term dataset on wild female baboons (Papio cynocephalus x P. anubis). We find that individuals who live in larger groups suffer social costs: compared to animals in smaller groups, they experience more agonistic interactions, fewer grooming interactions, and sparser social networks. These social costs arise, in part, from a pattern in which relationships within dyads become more agonistic as group size increases (i.e., a given dyad exhibits fewer grooming interactions relative to agonistic interactions when it is living in a larger group). While individuals in large groups generally maintain the same number of strong bonds as individuals in small groups, they tend to develop weak bonds with a greater number of social partners that results in, on average, weaker bonds overall. Our results demonstrate that, despite potential benefits to large groups in terms of predation risk and intergroup competition, the social lives of individuals in larger groups involve less affiliation and more conflict in this wild primate population.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗