bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.23.666409

Spatial Dynamics in the Yeast Galactose Switch Revealed Through RDME-ODE Hybrid 4D Simulations

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells are spatially organized into functionally-distinct compartments. This three-dimensional(3D) organization generates intracellular heterogeneities that can modulate regulatory dynamics. Despite this knowledge of subcellular organization, most quantitative gene-regulation models still assume a well-mixed environment in which molecules can react regardless of their spatial positions. Here, we use the well-established galactose switch in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to develop spatially-resolved models that integrate experimentally-derived intracellular architectures, including chromosome organization, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and spatially distinct ribosome populations. We implement a hybrid stochastic-deterministic framework in which gene expression is modeled using a reaction-diffusion master equation that enforces locality (i.e., reactions occur only when molecules are in physical proximity), while metabolic and transport processes are captured by ordinary differential equations. Guided by electron microscopy and biochemical constraints, we quantify how accounting for intracellular spatial organization alters regulatory predictions in the galactose switch. We show that chromosome geometry has little effect on Gal2p output, whereas ER-associated translation reduces Gal2p delivery to the plasma membrane; the largest decrease of Gal2p abundance occurs when translation of GAL2 mRNA is restricted to a population of ribosomes physically bound to the ER. Together, these results demonstrate that more realistic 3D cellular architectures and local reaction rules can qualitatively change regulatory predictions, motivating integration of intracellular organization in future whole-cell models. Author SummaryEukaryotic cells are highly organized spaces with distinct subcellular compartments and heterogeneous distributions of molecules which influence how cells function. Yet, most computational models of gene regulation assume a spatially homogeneous intracellular environment. To quantify how intracellular architecture influences regulatory predictions, we developed spatially resolved models of the galactose switch in budding yeast, a well-characterized gene regulatory system controlling the response to extracellular galactose. We compared conventional well-stirred simulations with models that explicitly incorporate experimentally informed intracellular organization, including chromosome positioning, endoplasmic reticulum geometry, and functionally distinct ribosome populations. Incorporating these spatial features substantially altered the dynamics of predicted gene activity, protein production, and intracellular sugar levels. Our results demonstrate that the three-dimensional organization of eukaryotic cells can significantly change regulatory outcomes of computational models, underscoring the need for integrating realistic spatial architectures in future models of eukaryotic gene regulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wu, T., Spindler, M.-C., Earnest, E., Li, H., Thornburg, Z. R., Mahamid, J., Luthey-Shculten, Z.. 2025-07-28. Spatial Dynamics in the Yeast Galactose Switch Revealed Through RDME-ODE Hybrid 4D Simulations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.23.666409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Homogeneous network inference for subtype-stratified master regulator analysis in cancer

Master-regulator analysis of 34 TCGA tumour cohorts (cancer x molecular subtype; n between 27 and 562 tumours) requires one regulatory network per cohort. Mutual-information (MI) networks inferred with ARACNe3 are the usual choice, but they are not available for the smallest cohorts; filling the gap with correlation networks would mix two methods inside the very comparison between subtypes that the analysis is meant to make. We therefore infer every network with a single procedure, fixed-size Spearman regulons (FSR): rank correlation between regulator and target, a fixed effect-size threshold rho >= 0.2, the per-target data-processing-inequality (DPI) pruning implemented in corto, bootstrap support, and truncation to the 100 best-supported targets per regulator. We quantify what this choice concedes and what it provides, labelling each claim as a standard result, a heuristic, or an empirical result. Rank correlation is more powerful than the MI estimators we simulated for n < 200 but cannot see non-monotone dependence, which in a synthetic worst case costs at most about 0.05-0.10 of the master regulators recovered; the per-target DPI is a heuristic with a measurable disagreement rate with the MI-based one; and pairwise dependence is not direct interaction, for MI and correlation alike. Where both methods are feasible (n >= 95) they overlap in 0.7 of the top-20 regulators, the same as two filterings of the same ARACNe3 network, although the rank correlation of the full score vector shows a measurable method effect in the tail. Subsampling large real cohorts indicates that networks inferred from fewer than 60 tumours do not reliably reproduce their own cohort's master regulators, that 60-100 is a grey zone, and that a cancer-wide network does not rescue small subtypes. We present FSR as an adequate and uniform choice for multi-cohort analysis, not as a statistically superior one.

systems biology↗

Low-fidelity simulator selection for multi-fidelity inference of epithelial vertex models

Vertex models link cell division, neighbour exchange, and intercellular forces to epithelial tissue form through parameters such as junctional line tension and perimeter contractility. Bayesian inference of these parameters from data quantifies their uncertainty, but for stochastic models of proliferating tissues it requires many costly simulations. Multi-fidelity simulation-based inference reduces this cost by training on many runs of a cheaper, less accurate ('low-fidelity') simulator before refining with a few full ('high-fidelity') runs. Low-fidelity versions can be constructed in several ways, for example by stopping simulations early, coarsening the timestep, or averaging fewer replicates, but it is unclear which to choose before committing to costly training. To address this, we introduce PRISM (Paired Ranking Index for Simulator Matching), a screen that compares each candidate with the full simulator on paired runs, scoring agreement in cell-packing statistics against cost. For a vertex model of a proliferating tissue, PRISM flags stopping early as unreliable before training; once trained, this choice can produce confidently wrong parameter estimates. By contrast, a coarser timestep, within the range tested, is cheap and accurate; while fewer replicates are accurate but too costly. Using a screened low-fidelity simulator, multi-fidelity inference outperforms approximate Bayesian computation and neural-network inference trained on full simulations alone, at matched cost and with well-calibrated uncertainty. The same pattern recurs for a second vertex model fitted to published Drosophila pupal-wing imaging data, although there stopping halfway proves safe. Together, our findings suggest that which approximations are safe depends on the model, and that screening them before training makes multi-fidelity inference of tissue mechanics practical.

systems biology↗

Calibrating developmental dynamics from single-cell atlases: lineage paths outrun least-action routes

Single-cell atlases infer developmental dynamics from destructive snapshots, yet how far realized lineage paths depart from such inferred dynamics has never been measured with controls. We introduce LADD (Least-Action Developmental Dynamics), a measurement framework that learns a stochastic developmental vector field from time-series single-cell RNA-seq and computes minimum-action and minimum-time paths, together with a three-layer calibration protocol that separates genuine path deviation from the generic cost of centroid measurement, and we compare its forecasting component with optimal-transport and flow-matching methods. In the lineage-resolved Caenorhabditis elegans atlas, the raw action ratio of observed lineage-centroid trajectories to optimal paths is 3.79, yet forward-simulated ensembles of the learned model itself score 2.07, leaving a genuine excess of about two-fold. In zebrafish (Danio rerio), the observed ratio sits entirely at the model's floor. Three mechanisms that could explain the residual deviation (detours, flow-opposition, and fate-map complexity) are each excluded; what remains is speed, with lineages moving 30-43% faster along the learned flow. We report validity boundaries for temporal resolution, cross-species comparison, and energetic interpretation, delimiting where action-based trajectory comparisons are meaningful.

systems biology↗