bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.21.665826

Procrastination partly reflects an evolutionary byproduct of non-planning impulsivity

Abstract

Procrastination has immediately visible repercussions on health and survival resilience, yet shows stably heritable and remains increasingly pervasive across human societies. Despite a paradox, this behavior is theoretically explained to represent a byproduct of evolutionary advantages underlying impulsivity, yet not deciphered well by scientific evidences. After adjusting psychometric endogeneity, we demonstrate the unique predictive roles of non-planning impulsivity (NPI) during late adolescence and early adulthood uniquely predicts procrastination in later adulthood in a twin cohort (N = 154). This association was further replicated in two independent cohorts (N = 327, N = 1,543). Using AE models, in conjunction of single-paper meta-analytic synthesis (N = 3,656 twin pairs), we observed significant shared genetic contributions underlying this NPI-procrastination association (rg = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.18 - 0.84). Beyond to the phenotypic heritability, employing a Genome-Wide-Association Study (GWAS), six NPI-procrastination overlapping SNPs are identified, functionally accounting for neural dysregulation. Thus, leveraging neurodevelopmental normative modelling (N = 37,407), online meta-analytic estimations (k = 198, loci = 5,855) and seed-based d mapping estimates (N = 893), cortical deviations in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) - the brain region showing highest probabilistic overlap mapping NPI to procrastination, partly explains their shared genetic variants, but are substantially independent in genetic contribution. Mendelian Randomization analysis finally indicates causal roles of NPI and procrastination both, to DLPFC deviations. Our findings empirically clarified this theory that procrastination partly derives from NPI as an evolutionary byproduct indeed, but is still unique in neurogenetic entities. Brief summaryProcrastination is a puzzling human behavior that compromises survival-relevant outcomes yet remains both widespread and heritable. Although theorized as a byproduct of impulsivitys evolutionary advantages, empirical support for this account has been limited. Here, we provide converging evidence across psychometric, genetic, and neuroimaging modalities to show that non-planning impulsivity during late adolescence and early adulthood uniquely predicts later procrastination, and that the two traits share significant genetic overlap. We further identify specific genetic variants and morphological deviations in the DLPFC that link, but also partially dissociate, their biological pathways. These findings clarify the evolutionary and neurogenetic architecture of procrastination and underscore its partial derivation from impulsivity alongside distinct developmental origins.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hu, Y., Xiang, J., Jin, Y., Fan, Q., Wang, C., Wu, Y., Zheng, D., Hu, B., Feng, T., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z.. 2025-07-22. Procrastination partly reflects an evolutionary byproduct of non-planning impulsivity. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.21.665826

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗