bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.20.665802

Multilayered molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying intestinal epithelial regeneration

Abstract

Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) are replenished by intestinal stem cells (ISCs) residing in the intestinal crypts and isthmus. Under homeostatic conditions, Lgr5+ crypt base columnar cells (CBCs) are considered the primary ISCs1,2. The supply of IECs, however, remains continuous even in the absence of Lgr5+ CBCs3, implying the existence of alternative ISC populations. Over the past decade, two contrasting models have emerged to explain the identities of these compensatory cells. The distinct cell population model proposes that slow-cycling, quiescent cells near the +4 position, act as reserve stem cells (rISCs)3-10. The cellular plasticity model suggests a broad spectrum of IECs can dedifferentiate into intermediate fetal-like states, thereby acquiring stemness11,12. It is unclear which of these models is correct because the signaling mechanisms governing crypt regenerative responses remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that Hedgehog (Hh) signaling orchestrates intestinal regeneration following Lgr5+ CBC loss by uniquely driving the emergence of de novo Lgr5+ CBCs from non-Lgr5+ CBCs clones. This regenerative mechanism is fundamentally distinct from both classical self-renewal of existing Lgr5+ CBCs and fetal-like dedifferentiation in intestinal villi. By accelerating the cell cycle and driving clonal competition among stem cell pools, Hh signaling leaves rare dormant stem cells in the crypt and isthmus regions. These rare cells act as damage-resistant "seeds" that can promote damage recovery, thereby conferring damage resistance on the tissue as a whole. Collectively, our findings identify novel molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying ISC regeneration and suggest potential therapeutic strategies for various intestinal epithelial diseases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Seo, D. W., Kim, S., Jeong, H., Cho, M. H., Lee, J.-S., Choi, S.-H., Kim, D.-H., Choi, J., Jeong, Y. T.. 2025-07-21. Multilayered molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying intestinal epithelial regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.20.665802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Functional characterization of Rho GTPase activating proteins SYDE1 and SYDE2

The human genome encodes more than 60 proteins containing Rho GTPase activating protein (RhoGAP) domains, many of which remain understudied with respect to their target specificity and biological roles. SYDE1 and SYDE2 are two such orphan RhoGAPs, for which there are few studies characterizing their biochemical and cellular functions and conflicting reports identifying their cognate GTPases. We previously identified SYDE1 and SYDE2 in a screen for substrates of the c-Jun N-terminal kinases. Here, we show that SYDE1 and SYDE2 are preferentially phosphorylated by JNK1 relative to other mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) at sites proximal to a kinase docking region. Purified SYDE1 and SYDE2 are shown to have significant catalytic GAP activity toward RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42. However, neither up- nor down-regulation of SYDE1/2 expression leads to detectable changes in bulk GTP loading of any of these GTPases. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that SYDE1 and SYDE2, in a partially GAP-dependent manner, increase cell spreading and number of focal adhesions, and promote more directionally persistent migration in HEK293 cells. Together, these findings establish SYDE1 and SYDE2 as robust JNK substrates with catalytic activity toward a set of Rho GTPases and reveal basic functions of SYDE1 and SYDE2 in regulating cell morphology, adhesion, and migration.

cell biology↗

The filopodial scaffold polyphosphate dictates cell adhesion-versus-invasion decisions

Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is an ancient polymer conserved across all life, serving cell type and location specific functions in every major compartment. Yet its role at the plasma membrane, where it accumulates to peak levels in many primary cells, is largely unknown. Here we identify polyP as a stabilizing component of filopodia, actin based membrane protrusions that govern cell adhesion, contact inhibition, and chemotaxis. Elevating cellular polyP increases filopodial stability and enhances cell adhesion, whereas reducing polyP accelerates filopodial disassembly and promotes cell migration. Mechanistically, we find that polyP acts as a structural filopodial scaffold, recruiting and organizing IRSp53, a membrane curvature inducing protein. We show that metastatic fibroblasts and breast cancer organoids carry markedly reduced and intracellularly reorganized polyP levels relative to their non transformed counterparts. Restoring endogenous polyP via lipid nanoparticle delivery suppresses their invasive phenotypes and reverses prometastatic gene expression signatures, implicating polyP as a primordial tumor suppressor.

cell biology↗

Mitochondrial transfer mediates metabolic communication between beta cells and islet macrophages

Pancreatic islet macrophages support islet homeostasis and adapt their metabolic program in response to environmental cues, including beta cell released factors. Intercellular mitochondrial transfer is a biological process that modulates cellular responses. To test whether beta cells, which are strongly secretory, transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages, we generated mice with beta cell-specific expression of mitochondrial GFP (PhAMfloxIns1Cre). We demonstrate that beta cells transfer mitochondria to islet macrophages in vivo and in vitro. Diabetogenic stressors did not alter the frequency of mitochondrial transfer and macrophages containing beta cell-derived GFP exhibit increased protein synthesis rates. RNA-seq identified upregulation of activity-regulated cytoskeleton associated protein (Arc) in macrophages receiving beta cell-derived mitochondria, while disruption of actin cytoskeleton dynamics prevented mitochondrial transfer. Together, these findings identify mitochondrial transfer as a previously unrecognized mechanism of beta cell-macrophage communication that may contribute to islet homeostasis and immune regulation.

cell biology↗