bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.11.664306

When one race is not enough: a relay model explains multisensory response times

Abstract

Humans typically respond faster to multisensory signals than to their unisensory components, a phenomenon known as the redundant signal effect (RSE). One of the earliest and most influential accounts, the race model, attributes the RSE to statistical facilitation, which arises from parallel, independent processing across sensory modalities. While this model captures some key features of the RSE, it frequently underestimates the observed speed-up leading to violations of the race model inequality (RMI), a benchmark used to test the models validity. To reconcile this discrepancy, we introduce the relay model, a minimal extension of the race architecture that incorporates cross-modal initiation. In this model, responses result from two sequential race processes, allowing a signal in one modality to trigger the onset of perceptual decision processing in another. This structure retains statistical facilitation as a core principle while introducing a single free model parameter that divides unisensory processing into gating and decision stages. Through simulations and fits to foundational empirical datasets, we show that the relay model captures both the magnitude and distributional shape of the RSE, including RMI violations. It also accounts for changes in the RSE under asynchronous stimulus onsets, a critical test in multisensory integration research. By extending the classical race model with minimal added complexity, the relay model offers a mechanistically explicit and biologically plausible framework for explaining the dynamics of multisensory decision-making. Author SummaryHow does the brain combine information from different senses, like hearing and seeing? For decades, researchers have found that people respond faster when signals from multiple senses occur together than when signals come from a single sense alone. Two main ideas have been proposed to explain this effect: one suggests that the senses operate independently, racing to trigger a response, while the other suggests that they cooperate to enhance processing. In this study, we introduce a new model of multisensory decision-making, called the relay model, which combines elements of both competition and cooperation. We propose that the brain uses a two-stage process: first, the faster sense initiates a second decision process. Then, in that second stage, the faster signal triggers a behavioural response. This relay-like mechanism accelerates responses through competition, while still allowing both senses to cooperate. By capturing key findings from classic experiments, the model offers a new perspective on how the brain combines multisensory information to guide behaviour.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Roberts, K., Otto, T. U.. 2025-07-16. When one race is not enough: a relay model explains multisensory response times. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.11.664306

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Cell Types in Describing Neuronal Physiological Features

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures detailed gene expression profiles at scale, while patch-clamp recordings measure intrinsic neuronal electrophysiological properties. Modeling the relations between these two modalities remains a challenge. Here, we compare how well electrophysiological features can be predicted by traditional transcriptomic cell type classification, representations derived from a foundational model (scGPT) pretrained on large-scale scRNA-seq datasets, ion channel-coding genes, and highly variable genes. Using paired transcriptomic and electrophysiological patch-sequencing data from 495 human neurons from neurosurgical tissue, we find that cluster-level cell type representations consistently outperform highly variable gene selection, ion channel gene selection, and context-enriched scGPT embeddings. Notably, performance varies across model architectures and initializations, and the best results are obtained by combining the outputs of separate cell type and scGPT-based models. Together, these findings suggest that traditional discrete cellular classification is highly effective in predicting physiological features. For maximum performance it can be complemented by pretrained transformer models.

neuroscience↗

A nonlinear inhibition pathway underlying cortical responses to tuned holographic optogenetic perturbations

Optogenetics enables causal manipulation of cortical activity. Perturbation responses can be counterintuitive due to network interactions, making theory essential for predicting them. Existing approaches often rely on linear approximations, which fail for many biologically relevant perturbations. Here we develop a nonlinear theory of responses to holographic perturbations in cell-type-specific recurrent networks with structured connectivity. We fit a nonlinear model to mouse V1 data, which shows cotuned-ensemble suppression: perturbing spatially clustered neurons with similar preferred orientations yields markedly stronger short-range suppression than perturbing untuned ensembles. We show that cotuned-ensemble suppression arises from a feature-tuned, nonlinear inhibition pathway implicating somatostatin-positive (SST) interneurons. The theory predicts that cotuned ensembles suppress parvalbumin-positive (PV) neurons but facilitate SST neurons, and links the degree of cotuned-ensemble suppression or facilitation to the variance of the SST response. This framework identifies mechanisms by which nonlinear inhibition sculpts cortical dynamics and establishes a predictive basis for targeted optogenetic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 across human tissues and cell types in Alzheimers disease

The apolipoprotein E {varepsilon}4 (APOE {varepsilon}4) allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimers disease (AD). However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. This study included 1691 participants from the Religious Orders Study and Rush Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP), 1226 participants from the Accelerating Medicines Partnership - Alzheimers Disease (AMP-AD) Diverse Cohorts Study, and 735 participants from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). To characterise APOE {varepsilon}4 molecular effects, we analysed proteomic data from plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived astrocytes and neurons, as well as transcriptomic and proteomic data from multiple brain regions. The association of APOE {varepsilon}4 with AD neuropathology was also examined. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers shared a plasma proteomic signature enriched for immune processes, irrespective of AD diagnosis. A machine learning classifier trained on this signature discriminated APOE {varepsilon}4 carriers from non-carriers in an independent cohort using CSF proteomics. APOE {varepsilon}4 carriage was associated with higher Braak stages and Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD) score. However, only limited APOE {varepsilon}4-associated transcriptomic and proteomic changes were observed in bulk brain tissue, with poor cross-layer concordance. Proteomic analyses of iPSC-derived astrocytes and neurons further revealed cell-type-specific APOE {varepsilon}4-associated changes. APOE {varepsilon}4 is associated with a consistent proteomic signature across plasma and CSF. Its molecular effects in the brain differ across cell types, brain regions and molecular layers. These findings support the need for cell-type-resolved multi-omic studies to elucidate how APOE {varepsilon}4 confers AD risk.

neuroscience↗