bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.07.10.663832

Multi-site phosphorylation of BCL2L13 in a TBK1- and AMPK-dependent manner reveals new modes of mitophagy regulation

Abstract

Mitophagy is a selective autophagic process that eliminates damaged mitochondria via lysosomal degradation, playing a crucial role in maintaining cellular metabolic balance. Mitophagy can occur through two pathways: ubiquitin-dependent and ubiquitin-independent. Recently, we and others have shown that, upon mitochondrial stress, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) contributes to Parkin-mediated, ubiquitin-dependent mitophagy. The ubiquitin-independent pathway involves multiple outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) "mitophagy receptors" that contain LC3-interacting region (LIR) motifs, including BNIP3, NIX/ BNIP3L, FUNDC1, and BCL2L13. LIR motifs bind Atg8/LC3 family proteins, facilitating the recruitment of the autophagosome membrane to target damaged mitochondria for degradation. The kinase Unc-51 Like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1) phosphorylates the serine preceding the LIR motif in BNIP3, NIX, and FUNDC1, enhancing their binding to LC3 and promoting mitophagy. However, while BCL2L13 has been identified as a ULK1 binding partner, its regulation by phosphorylation remains unclear. We utilized mass spectrometry (MS) to map phosphorylation sites in BCL2L13 following mitochondrial stress and developed phospho-specific antibodies against two sites, Ser261 and Ser275, which were induced after exposure to the mitochondrial uncoupler, CCCP. Endogenous BCL2L13 Ser261 and Ser275 were both phosphorylated in an AMPK-dependent manner in cells and tissues. As neither site matches the established AMPK substrate consensus motif, we sought to identify which kinases directly mediate their phosphorylation downstream of AMPK. Surprisingly, genetic studies revealed that ULK1 is not regulating either site, but instead, TBK1 is controlling Ser275. This work reveals that BCL2L13 is unique amongst mitophagy receptors in being activated by mitochondrial stress and innate immune stimuli in an AMPK- and TBK1-dependent manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ahmed, H., Reynolds, M. B., Kasof, G., Shadel, G. S., Shaw, R. J.. 2025-07-11. Multi-site phosphorylation of BCL2L13 in a TBK1- and AMPK-dependent manner reveals new modes of mitophagy regulation. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.10.663832

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Differential requirement for the Ire1 luminal domain in Candida albicans drug susceptibility and pathogenicity

The opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans depends on the unfolded protein response (UPR) for cell wall integrity, antifungal tolerance, filamentous growth, and virulence. The UPR is driven by the conserved transmembrane sensor Ire1, which is activated either by misfolded proteins through its luminal domain or by lipid bilayer stress (LBS) through its transmembrane domain. In budding yeast, these two activation modes deploy divergent transcriptional programs. Whether the requirement for these two input domains is separable in C. albicans, where the cell membrane and cell wall are themselves the targets of major antifungal drug classes, remains unknown. Here, we engineered a C. albicans strain expressing Ire1 lacking an intact luminal domain (ire1{Delta}LD), which no longer detects proteotoxic stress. The ire1{Delta}LD strain grew in the presence of the azole antifungals fluconazole and miconazole but was highly sensitive to heat shock, cell wall stress, and the echinocandin caspofungin. It was also unable to sustain filamentous growth and showed reduced virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model. RNA sequencing revealed only modest changes to the steady-state transcriptome of ire1{Delta}LD cells. Together, these findings define a differential requirement for the input domains of C. albicans Ire1, uncoupling growth under azole-induced membrane stress from the cell wall, thermal, and virulence-associated outputs that depend on proteotoxic sensing, a distinction that could inform antifungal strategies targeting the UPR.

cell biology↗

Nucleosome Core Allostery Governs Chromatin Recognition and Cell Fate

Nucleosomes regulate chromatin folding, accessibility, and factor recruitment. Current models primarily attribute these functions to histone tail modifications, while the core is largely viewed as a structural scaffold. Yet subtle changes within the nucleosome core can produce profound functional consequences, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. Here, we describe nucleosome core allostery as a fundamental principle of chromatin regulation that amplifies the impact of minimal nucleosome variations. Leveraging natural differences between H2A.Z variants, we show that the nucleosome core encodes distinct conformational dynamics that propagate allosterically, thereby controlling nucleosome accessibility and recognition by chromatin factors. As a result, a single buried amino acid substitution alone is sufficient to reprogram nucleosome dynamics and bias cell identity. Our findings establish the nucleosome core as an allosteric regulatory module and provide a generalizable framework for how subtle variation within nucleosomes is amplified into diverse biological outcomes in development and disease.

cell biology↗

YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics coordinate progenitor expansion and differentiation commitment

Progenitor cells must proliferate to expand the cell population, yet terminal differentiation requires this proliferative state to end. How signaling controls the duration of this proliferative window remains poorly understood. Using adipogenesis and live single-cell imaging of differentiation, cell-cycle, and ERK-activity reporters, we show that YAP and TAZ coordinate progenitor expansion with differentiation commitment by regulating ERK dynamics. YAP/TAZ maintain cells in a fluctuating high-ERK state that promotes proliferation while actively keeping the differentiation driver PPARG below the threshold for irreversible commitment. Crucially, this differentiation block is not explained by proliferation alone: inhibiting CDK4/6 or AKT suppressed proliferation without restoring differentiation, whereas MEK-ERK inhibition restored differentiation even when YAP/TAZ activity remained high. As YAP/TAZ activity decreases, dampened ERK fluctuations trigger PPARG activation. These findings support a self-limiting model in which YAP/TAZ-driven progenitor expansion progressively increases cell density and contact-dependent Hippo signaling, reducing YAP/TAZ activity and terminating the proliferative phase. Consequently, transient YAP/TAZ activation expands the progenitor pool while preserving subsequent differentiation, whereas sustained activation suppresses commitment. Together, these findings identify YAP/TAZ-controlled ERK dynamics as the nexus coordinating progenitor expansion with terminal differentiation and suggest that slower density-dependent Hippo feedback may set the duration of this proliferative window to regulate differentiated cell-number output.

cell biology↗