bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.06.27.661689

Dispersal behavior rather than dispersal morphology creates social polymorphism in Formica ants

Abstract

O_LIDispersal evolution and social evolution are interlinked. Dispersal is necessary for avoiding kin competition and inbreeding, but limited dispersal also allows beneficial social interactions with kin. In ants, a correlation between poor dispersal and complex societies, where a big proportion of queens are philopatric, is well documented, but the underlying causal mechanisms are not clear. C_LIO_LIIn this study we investigate the dispersal ability of six Formica species that vary in their colony queen number and nest founding mode, from three different subgenera. Investigating resource allocation in the bodies of young queens and males allows us to analyze the evolutionary causalities between dispersal ability and social organization. We measured the body ratios including wing-muscle ratio; glycogen, triglyceride and protein resources with colorimetric assays; and microscopic wing muscle structures with transmission electron microscopy, with an overall sample size of 1515 individual males and queens. C_LIO_LIOur results suggest that the physical condition of individuals does not strongly correlate with the dispersal patterns of the species, contrary to assumptions based on earlier studies in both ants and other insects. There was still a minor effect of social organization on male wing-muscle ratio, which is an interesting case of sexual coevolution of dispersal traits: it is likely that the queen philopatric behavior is reflected in male behavior and consequently in male morphology - even when our overall results support the hypothesis that ant dispersal is male biased regardless of social organization. Further, our intraspecific analyses in two of the six species reveal different patterns in their flight abilities in connection to their social organization, further pointing towards a mismatch between dispersal behavior and ability. C_LIO_LIIn Formica queens, philopatry seems to be a behavioral trait of the individuals rather than a consequence of colony-level resource allocation into dispersal ability, pointing towards a "behavior first" evolutionary route. The queens may selfishly choose not to disperse even when their society provides them with the resources for it. This raises new questions about conflicts over dispersal in these highly social systems. C_LI

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hakala, S. M., Belevich, I., Jokitalo, E., Seppa, P., Helantera, H.. 2025-07-01. Dispersal behavior rather than dispersal morphology creates social polymorphism in Formica ants. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.27.661689

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Ocean current models predict spatial structure for coastal biodiversity

Genomic diversity provides the raw material through which all evolutionary processes occur. Accurately describing how environmental features affect patterns of diversity shows promise in predicting the resilience of populations and entire communities to dynamic environments and novel stressors. Identifying the contribution of purely neutral responses to environmental effects can be difficult, especially across large spatial ranges with many covarying environmental features. Using an individual-based model of larvae carried by ocean currents, we predict patterns of neutral genomic diversity in a passively dispersed coastal species, suggesting large geographic regions of relative homogeneity with ancestry determined by the nearest "upstream" population with limited larval input. The genomic identity that dominates each region sharply transitions at the next such interruption, generating hierarchical structure and violating assumptions of isolation-by-distance. We call these upstream populations "lineage source regions" (LSRs), and we find strong concordance between LSR model predictions and an empirical population genomic survey of a keystone salt marsh mussel (Geukensia demissa). We quantitatively validate model performance and goodness-of-fit, updating baseline predictions of genomic diversity patterns from the classic isolation-by-distance model to this LSR framework. This spatially explicit coastal ancestry model has potential for generalization across passive dispersing species.

evolutionary biology↗

TaxaAudit: A statistical model of consensus in phylogenetics identifies non-monophyletic taxa

Interpreting variation in genes and traits across species requires understanding their evolutionary relationships. Taxonomic hierarchies provide a practical approximation of the tree of life, with the NCBI taxonomy linking this framework directly to public sequence data. Some named groups, however, are not evolutionary clades, and recognizing these exceptions requires knowledge scattered across the phylogenetics literature. Here we introduce TaxaAudit, a statistical model that identifies taxonomic groups whose monophyly is repeatedly contradicted by published phylogenies. The model accounts for background taxonomic conflict and the ability of each study's species sampling to expose non-monophyly. Applied to 5,865 molecular phylogenies from TimeTree, TaxaAudit flagged 516 NCBI taxa at family rank and below for significant recurrent contradiction of monophyly. Excluding these taxa's monophyly requirements improved the taxonomy's agreement with independent phylogenomic reference trees and phylogenies withheld from discovery. Flagged taxa were also 3.61 times as likely as matched controls to have their monophyly challenged in publications outside the discovery set. In tree-inference experiments, excluding these monophyly constraints improved agreement with reference phylogenies relative to enforcing the unmodified taxonomy. By identifying groups whose monophyly should not be assumed, TaxaAudit lets researchers draw on published phylogenetic knowledge without reviewing the specialist literature for every taxon. This supports broader use of the NCBI taxonomy as an evolutionary framework for biological comparisons.

evolutionary biology↗

Shared landscape, divergent genomes: Comparative population genomics of co-occurring flora in an isolated Australian mountain range

Understanding how landscape heterogeneity shapes genomic variation is key to conserving biodiversity and evolutionary potential. Yet conservation genomics is typically conducted at the single species level, limiting our ability to identify shared genomic patterns or understand how co-occurring taxa differ in their response to common environmental gradients. We assessed spatial patterns of genomic variation and their associations with geographic and environmental features among populations of nine co-existing plant species with contrasting life-histories and ecological traits across Gariwerd, a threatened biodiversity hotspot in south-eastern Australia. All species exhibited weak overall genetic structure, although the magnitude and spatial distribution of differentiation varied among species. Despite this variation, broadly consistent spatial trends were apparent, with higher genomic divergence largely concentrated in central zones and higher genomic diversity localised in southern regions of the landscape. Significant associations between genetic differentiation and geographic distance were observed in three species, while another species showed associations with environmental distance. These findings demonstrate that coexisting species can show overlapping spatial patterns in genomic variation while differing markedly in their associations with geographic and environmental variation across the same landscape. This comparative approach provides a basis for spatial prioritisation and conservation planning, while highlighting the complex eco-evolutionary processes operating across heterogeneous landscapes.

evolutionary biology↗